RAMIREZ_Appendix_Writ_Certiorari_2_6_2017
Case: 15-11914 Date (131 Filed: of 2011) 12/04/2015 Page: 8 of 13 it was taken on July 13, 2011. Further, the testimony contained in this excerpt is nothing more than a vague and conclusory statement that is insufficient for purposes of summary judgment. See Sun v. Girardot, 237 F. App'x 415, 417 (11th Cir. 2007) (this court has consistently held that conclusory allegations without specific supporting facts have no probative value, and are legally insufficient to defeat summary judgment) (citing Leigh v. Warner Bros., Inc., 212 F.3d 1210, 1217 (11th Cir.2000); Sammons v. Taylor, 967 F.2d 1533, 1544-45 & n. 5 (11th Cir.1992)). C. APPENDIX NOS. 14, 15, 16, P. 136-38 (P. 4), 70, P. 216 (P. 17), 73, P. 220 (P. 17), 85, P. 234-35 (P. 20) None of these documents are in the record. The first four documents are related to Ramirez’s FMLA leave and return to work. Appellant then references documents produced by Defendant in response to Plaintiff’s First Request for Production, (bates numbered DEF000459, DEF000643, DEF000681, DEF000174, DEF000660-661). The last of these pages appear to be notes of Pamerly Thomas. D. APPENDIX NO. 20, P. 145-46 (P.4), 24, P. 155-56 (P. 6), 59, P. 202-03 (P. 13), 65, P. 209 (P. 14) Appellant references several pages (50, 51, 24, 25, 38, 64, and 13) of Anita Mujagic’s deposition transcript (pages 145-46, 155-56, 202-03, and 209 of the Appendix) that are not contained in the record of the district court. Although excerpts of Mujagic’s deposition transcript are contained in the record below (Dkt. 88-6), these particular pages are not in the record. A. 581
Case: 15-11914 Date (132 Filed: of 2011) 12/04/2015 Page: 9 of 13 E. APPENDIX NO. 23, P. 150-57 (P. 5) Appellant references p. 22 (page 154 of the Appendix) of the transcript of Wendy Gould’s deposition. Although part of Wendy Gould’s deposition transcript is part of the record (Dkt. 37), page 22 is not in the record. F. APPENDIX NO. 25, P. 158-161 (P. 7) Appellant references p. 29 (page 161 of the Appendix) of the transcript of Jose Hernandez’s deposition. Although part of Hernandez’s deposition transcript is part of the record (Dkt. 124-1), page 29 is not in the record. G. APPENDIX NO. 34, P. 171 (P. 9) Appellant references “Def’s Sealed Exhibits [209] Document responsive to Plaintiff’s First Request #1.” DEF000209 is part of the Defendant’s Sealed Exhibits that were filed with the district court on 11/17/11, but in his initial brief, Appellant references DEF000219. However, he quotes part of SOP 80-007 (“Standard Operating Procedures”), which is nowhere in the Defendant’s sealed documents or anywhere else in the record. H. APPENDIX NOS. 43, P. 179-80 (P. 11), 63, P.207 (P. 14), 79, 80, 81, 82, PP. 228-31 (P. 19) Appellant references pages 13, 20, 25, 26, 27 (pages 179-80, 207, 228-31 of the Appendix) of the transcript of Valerie Gordon’s deposition. Although part of the Gordon deposition transcript is part of the record (Dkt. 88-5), those pages are not in the record. A. 682
- Page 31 and 32: § 956. Powers and duties of clerks
- Page 33 and 34: § 1254. Courts of appeals; certior
- Page 35 and 36: Case: 15-11914 Date (751 Filed: of
- Page 37 and 38: Case: 15-11914 Date (753 Filed: of
- Page 39 and 40: Case: 15-11914 Date (755 Filed: of
- Page 41 and 42: Case: 15-11914 Date (757 Filed: of
- Page 43 and 44: Case: 15-11914 Date (759 Filed: of
- Page 45 and 46: Case: 15-11914 Date (788 Filed: of
- Page 47 and 48: Case: 15-11914 Date (790 Filed: of
- Page 49 and 50: Selected docket entries for case 15
- Page 51 and 52: 11/18/2015 ORDER: Appellee’s moti
- Page 53 and 54: 04/20/2016 DIS−2CIV Notice to Cou
- Page 55 and 56: Case 8:10-cv-02003-MSS-TGW Document
- Page 57 and 58: Case: 8:10-cv-2003 As of: 09/03/201
- Page 59 and 60: Case: 8:10-cv-2003 As of: 09/03/201
- Page 61 and 62: Case: 8:10-cv-2003 As of: 09/03/201
- Page 63 and 64: Case: 8:10-cv-2003 As of: 09/03/201
- Page 65 and 66: Case: 8:10-cv-2003 As of: 09/03/201
- Page 67 and 68: Case: 8:10-cv-2003 As of: 09/03/201
- Page 69 and 70: Case: 8:10-cv-2003 As of: 09/03/201
- Page 71 and 72: Case: 15-11914 Date (78 Filed: of 2
- Page 73 and 74: Case: 15-11914 Date (80 Filed: of 2
- Page 75 and 76: Case: 15-11914 Date (124 Filed: of
- Page 77 and 78: Case: 15-11914 Date (126 Filed: of
- Page 79 and 80: Case: 15-11914 Date (128 Filed: of
- Page 81: Case: 15-11914 Date (130 Filed: of
- Page 85 and 86: Case: 15-11914 Date (134 Filed: of
- Page 87 and 88: Case: 15-11914 Date (136 Filed: of
- Page 89 and 90: Case: 15-11914 Date (762 Filed: of
- Page 91 and 92: Case: 15-11914 Date (764 Filed: of
- Page 93 and 94: Case: 15-11914 Date (766 Filed: of
- Page 95 and 96: Case: 15-11914 Date (768 Filed: of
- Page 97 and 98: Case: 15-11914 Date (770 Filed: of
- Page 99 and 100: Case: 15-11914 Date (772 Filed: of
- Page 101 and 102: Case: 15-11914 Date (774 Filed: of
- Page 103 and 104: Case: 15-11914 Date (776 Filed: of
- Page 105 and 106: Case: 15-11914 Date (778 Filed: of
- Page 107 and 108: Case: 15-11914 Date (780 Filed: of
- Page 109 and 110: Case: 15-11914 Date (782 Filed: of
- Page 111 and 112: Case: 15-11914 Date (784 Filed: of
- Page 113 and 114: A. 112 Case: 15-11914 Date (786 Fil
Case: 15-11914 Date (132 Filed: of 2011) 12/04/2015 Page: 9 of 13<br />
E. APPENDIX NO. 23, P. 150-57 (P. 5)<br />
Appellant references p. 22 (page 154 of the <strong>Appendix</strong>) of the transcript of<br />
Wendy Gould’s deposition. Although part of Wendy Gould’s deposition transcript<br />
is part of the record (Dkt. 37), page 22 is not in the record.<br />
F. APPENDIX NO. 25, P. 158-161 (P. 7)<br />
Appellant references p. 29 (page 161 of the <strong>Appendix</strong>) of the transcript of<br />
Jose Hernandez’s deposition. Although part of Hernandez’s deposition transcript is<br />
part of the record (Dkt. 124-1), page 29 is not in the record.<br />
G. APPENDIX NO. 34, P. 171 (P. 9)<br />
Appellant references “Def’s Sealed Exhibits [209] Document responsive to<br />
Plaintiff’s First Request #1.”<br />
DEF000209 is part of the Defendant’s Sealed<br />
Exhibits that were filed with the district court on 11/17/11, but in his initial brief,<br />
Appellant references DEF000219. However, he quotes part of SOP 80-007<br />
(“Standard Operating Procedures”), which is nowhere in the Defendant’s sealed<br />
documents or anywhere else in the record.<br />
H. APPENDIX NOS. 43, P. 179-80 (P. 11), 63, P.207 (P. 14), 79, 80,<br />
81, 82, PP. 228-31 (P. 19)<br />
Appellant references pages 13, 20, 25, 26, 27 (pages 179-80, 207, 228-31 of<br />
the <strong>Appendix</strong>) of the transcript of Valerie Gordon’s deposition. Although part of<br />
the Gordon deposition transcript is part of the record (Dkt. 88-5), those pages are<br />
not in the record.<br />
A. 682
Change language