Kosovo Human Development Report 2010 - UNDP Kosovo - United ...

Kosovo Human Development Report 2010 - UNDP Kosovo - United ... Kosovo Human Development Report 2010 - UNDP Kosovo - United ...

kosovo.undp.org
from kosovo.undp.org More from this publisher
12.12.2012 Views

Table 2.2 mestic Product (GDP) from 2000-2001. However, as the post-conflict boom subsided, growth in 2002–2005 significantly slowed down. A reduction in international financial support and the scaling-back of the United Nations (UN) presence hit GDP growth from construction and trade. Kosovo’s agriculture and industrial sectors – which had never fully recovered – were also affected. In 2005-2008, GDP once again accelerated, growing at an average annual rate of more than 4 percent, even reaching 5.4 percent in 2008. Growth was mainly driven by strong domestic demand (consumption and investment) fuelled by domestic credit growth, 33 a significant increase in public investment and sustained levels of worker remittances and donor activity. The privatization process also made its incremental contributions to investment and growth in recent years. Privatization accelerated in 2005 after a very slow start in 2004. This led to an increase in the overall level of investment (both domestic and foreign) and export growth, (see Table 2.2). Main Macroeconomic Indicators, 2003 – 2010 34 | KOSOVO HUMAN DEVELOPMENT REPORT 2010 The recent global economic downturn affected Kosovo through a decline in exports, foreign investment and remittances. Exports recorded a decrease by 18 percent (from 198.5 million EUR in 2008 to 162.6 million EUR to 2009). However, as exports of goods only account for about 5 percent of GDP, the impact has been small relative to the impact in neighbouring countries. According to preliminary data from CBK, in 2009 foreign direct investment (FDI) in Kosovo declined by 20.5 percent (from 366 million EUR in 2008 to 291 million EUR in 2009) since the global financial crisis negatively affected investors’ interest in major destinations for FDI including the energy sector. Remittances, the single largest inflow category in the balance of payments, have not yet witnessed the sharp decline that some had feared. However, Kosovo escaped the worst impact of the crisis, ironically, because of its limited integration into the global economy. GDP growth reverted to 4 percent in 2009. Public expenditure, particularly for capital investment, also increased over the period of 2008-2009. Kosovo Main Indicators/Years 2003-2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Growth rates 34 % GDP 3.0 3.9 5.0 5.4 3.8 4.3 GDP per capita 0.1 2.4 3.8 3.8 2.3 2.8 Consumer Price Index (CPI) -0.7 0.6 4.4 9.4 -2.2 1.4 % of GDP Revenues 20.2 22.3 25.9 25.3 29.5 25.4 Expenditures 22.2 19.9 18.9 25.3 31.3 29.7 Primary balance -2.0 2.4 7.0 0.0 -1.8 -4.3 Current account balance (after grants) -7.6 -4.4 -10.2 -16.3 -18.4 -17.3 Nominal GDP (in millions of EUR) 3,023 3,191 3,464 3,724 3,792 4,028 Nominal GDP per capita (in EUR) 1,480 1,520 1,629 1,726 1,731 1,812 Population (in thousands) 2,042 2,100 2,126 2,158 2,190 2,223 Source: Macroeconomic Department, MEF and IMF Aide-Memoire, September 2009

managed to increase its public expenditures by 20 percent or about 188 million EUR from 950.5 million EUR in 2008 to 1138.6 million EUR in 2009. Significant increases were recorded in all categories of public expenditure in 2009. Salaries and wages increased from 221.7 million EUR to 264.4 million EUR; goods and services from 157.9 to 216.7 million EUR; transfers and subsidies from 218.5 to 257 million EUR; and finally capital expenditures from 34 7.1 to 400 million EUR. It should be noted that the increase of public expenditure was not a result of sustainable increase in taxes or an increase in international aid. Rather it was due to utilization of surplus from the previous year and from a one-off non-tax revenue dividend payment from Post and Telecommunications of Kosovo (PTK), the publicly owned enterprise in amount of 200 million EUR (or 5% of GDP). The detrimental impact of Kosovo’s uneven growth and – more pertinently – its shaky foundation for growth can be clearly seen in the condition of its labour market. Private consumption fuelled by remittances and foreign aid is not a reliable platform for private sector development. In Kosovo the private sector remains largely informal, unregulated and increasingly struggles to deliver reliable, long-term and well-remunerated employment. Despite positive GDP and HDI values, Kosovo’s labour market remains stagnant and restricted. Based on the latest labour force survey, 35 about 48 percent of the labour force was estimated to be unemployed, 36 while 73 percent of youth was unemployed in 2008. Unemployment tends to be long-term, where nearly 82 percent of the unemployed are out of work for more than 12 months. According to some public opinion polls, unemployment is seen by Kosovans as the most important issue facing Kosovo. 37 The measures of Kosovo’s labour resource utilization such as labour force participation rate (percentage of working-age persons in an economy who are employed and are unemployed but looking for a job) and employment rate (percentage of adults working for pay, and thus in a position to earn income to take care of themselves and their families) are the lowest in the Western Balkan region (46 percent and 24 percent respectively) and far lower than average EU figures. The same measures for women are extremely low (respectively 26.1 percent and 10.5 percent). More than half of the working age population of Kosovo was unemployed in 2008 while 58 percent of women (15-64 years) were unemployed. 38 Table 2.3 Labour force participation rates Key labour market indicators, percentages (2004-2008) High unemployment rates lead to high, persistent and widespread income poverty rates. A 2007 World Bank Poverty Assessment Report based on 2005 and 2006 data found that about 45 percent of the population in Kosovo was poor 39 and unable to meet human needs while 18 percent was extremely poor 40 and unable even to meet basic survival needs. Another 18 percent of the population lived just above the poverty line. These poverty rates are very high compared to neighbouring countries. Moreover, they are not reducing over time. The Bank’s 2004 2006 2008 46.2 52.3 46.0 Employment rates 27.9 29.0 24.1 Unemployment rates 39.7 44.9 47.5 Source: SOK, Labour Force Surveys (2004- 2008) ECONOMIC AND LABOUR MARKET EXCLUSION | 35

Table<br />

2.2<br />

mestic Product (GDP) from 2000-2001.<br />

However, as the post-conflict boom<br />

subsided, growth in 2002–2005 significantly<br />

slowed down. A reduction<br />

in international financial support and<br />

the scaling-back of the <strong>United</strong> Nations<br />

(UN) presence hit GDP growth from<br />

construction and trade. <strong>Kosovo</strong>’s agriculture<br />

and industrial sectors – which<br />

had never fully recovered – were also<br />

affected.<br />

In 2005-2008, GDP once again accelerated,<br />

growing at an average annual rate<br />

of more than 4 percent, even reaching<br />

5.4 percent in 2008. Growth was mainly<br />

driven by strong domestic demand<br />

(consumption and investment) fuelled<br />

by domestic credit growth, 33 a significant<br />

increase in public investment and<br />

sustained levels of worker remittances<br />

and donor activity. The privatization<br />

process also made its incremental contributions<br />

to investment and growth in<br />

recent years. Privatization accelerated<br />

in 2005 after a very slow start in 2004.<br />

This led to an increase in the overall<br />

level of investment (both domestic<br />

and foreign) and export growth, (see<br />

Table 2.2).<br />

Main Macroeconomic Indicators, 2003 – <strong>2010</strong><br />

34 | KOSOVO HUMAN DEVELOPMENT REPORT <strong>2010</strong><br />

The recent global economic downturn<br />

affected <strong>Kosovo</strong> through a decline<br />

in exports, foreign investment and remittances.<br />

Exports recorded a decrease<br />

by 18 percent (from 198.5 million EUR<br />

in 2008 to 162.6 million EUR to 2009).<br />

However, as exports of goods only account<br />

for about 5 percent of GDP, the<br />

impact has been small relative to the<br />

impact in neighbouring countries. According<br />

to preliminary data from CBK,<br />

in 2009 foreign direct investment (FDI)<br />

in <strong>Kosovo</strong> declined by 20.5 percent<br />

(from 366 million EUR in 2008 to 291<br />

million EUR in 2009) since the global<br />

financial crisis negatively affected investors’<br />

interest in major destinations<br />

for FDI including the energy sector.<br />

Remittances, the single largest inflow<br />

category in the balance of payments,<br />

have not yet witnessed the sharp decline<br />

that some had feared. However,<br />

<strong>Kosovo</strong> escaped the worst impact of<br />

the crisis, ironically, because of its limited<br />

integration into the global economy.<br />

GDP growth reverted to 4 percent<br />

in 2009.<br />

Public expenditure, particularly<br />

for capital investment, also increased<br />

over the period of 2008-2009. <strong>Kosovo</strong><br />

Main Indicators/Years 2003-2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 <strong>2010</strong><br />

Growth rates 34 %<br />

GDP 3.0 3.9 5.0 5.4 3.8 4.3<br />

GDP per capita 0.1 2.4 3.8 3.8 2.3 2.8<br />

Consumer Price Index (CPI) -0.7 0.6 4.4 9.4 -2.2 1.4<br />

% of GDP<br />

Revenues 20.2 22.3 25.9 25.3 29.5 25.4<br />

Expenditures 22.2 19.9 18.9 25.3 31.3 29.7<br />

Primary balance -2.0 2.4 7.0 0.0 -1.8 -4.3<br />

Current account balance (after grants) -7.6 -4.4 -10.2 -16.3 -18.4 -17.3<br />

Nominal GDP (in millions of EUR) 3,023 3,191 3,464 3,724 3,792 4,028<br />

Nominal GDP per capita (in EUR) 1,480 1,520 1,629 1,726 1,731 1,812<br />

Population (in thousands) 2,042 2,100 2,126 2,158 2,190 2,223<br />

Source: Macroeconomic Department, MEF and IMF Aide-Memoire, September 2009

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!