Kosovo Human Development Report 2010 - UNDP Kosovo - United ...
Kosovo Human Development Report 2010 - UNDP Kosovo - United ... Kosovo Human Development Report 2010 - UNDP Kosovo - United ...
1. Where is Kosovo headed? After decades of political and social turbulence, Kosovo has recently experienced some decisive and formative changes. The “Constitution of Kosovo”, which envisages a significant role for the European Union in Kosovo, entered into force on 15 June 2008. In the past three years Kosovo has been recognized by 70 countries, joined the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank and is aspiring to become a full member of the European Union (EU). With such high ambitions, the trajectory of change across Kosovo’s governance structures and macro-economy has necessarily been extremely steep. Of Kosovo’s neighbours taking a similar path, none are burdened with quite such a heavy legacy of political discrimination and neglect. Most, if not all, are much further ahead. They remain an incentive to encourage Kosovo’s ongoing efforts, but also serve as a reminder of just how far there is to go. Kosovo’s significant international presence has also reconfigured itself to support the EU accession process – both financially and with a high volume of mentoring and technical assistance. Since 2000, the international community has probably invested more nonmilitary resources per capita in Kosovo Introduction than in any other post-conflict arena. The EU, Kosovo’s largest donor, has announced its intention to devote more funds to Kosovo per capita than to any other place in the world over the next three years. 1 Already the EU alone has provided nearly one billion EUR to Kosovo between 2000 and 2006 2 through the CARDS programme (Community Assistance for Reconstruction, Development and Stabilization) and a further 426 million EUR under the Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance (IPA) from 2007. 3 Other development partners, including the US Government and UN agencies, funds and programmes, have provided even more with a view to remodeling Kosovo’s entire political and economic structures to align with European standards. The sheer weight of change required has created a human development conundrum. In striving for an ideal future of prosperity and stability, Kosovo risks stalling its internal human development process. The EU accession process is extremely complex, requiring a vast remodeling of legislative frameworks, compliance with a very high standard of governance and regional cooperation to maintain a fundamental philosophical cohesion across the European family. This process has brought both benefits and pressures for Kosovo’s governance structures, which have been passed on INTRODUCTION | 17
- Page 1: The views expressed in this report
- Page 4 and 5: VI specific difficulties that group
- Page 7 and 8: Abbreviations ALMP Active Labour Ma
- Page 9 and 10: The UN’s Human Development Report
- Page 11 and 12: agents without any true sense of ow
- Page 13: Contents Foreword .................
- Page 17 and 18: lenges. In particular, conditions f
- Page 19 and 20: an inclusive process. Home care ser
- Page 21 and 22: 1.1 Social inclusion/ exclusion: ev
- Page 23 and 24: of exclusion. Discriminatory polici
- Page 25 and 26: socially excluded groups cannot nec
- Page 27 and 28: ganizations and laws - and vital bu
- Page 29: mechanism for mitigating poverty in
- Page 32 and 33: Table 2.2 mestic Product (GDP) from
- Page 34 and 35: FIGURe 2.1 Households report also i
- Page 36 and 37: The overlap between those excluded
- Page 38 and 39: have been compounded by the ongoing
- Page 40 and 41: FIGURe 0% 2.4 2% 4% Village The inc
- Page 42 and 43: Entrepreneurs in Kosovo’ report l
- Page 44 and 45: FIGURe 0% 2.12 and realize opportun
- Page 46 and 47: a supportive investment climate, th
- Page 48 and 49: dium sized enterprises (SMEs): a go
- Page 50 and 51: as identify lessons learned. The le
- Page 52 and 53: Kosovo today - they may be correct.
- Page 54 and 55: strate a wide range of learning nee
- Page 56 and 57: 13.7 to one in elementary education
- Page 58 and 59: RAE students constituted a mere 1.4
- Page 60 and 61: Table 3.1 tional outcomes of inhabi
- Page 62 and 63: • Equip teachers with inclusionse
1. Where is <strong>Kosovo</strong> headed?<br />
After decades of political and social<br />
turbulence, <strong>Kosovo</strong> has recently experienced<br />
some decisive and formative<br />
changes. The “Constitution of <strong>Kosovo</strong>”,<br />
which envisages a significant role for<br />
the European Union in <strong>Kosovo</strong>, entered<br />
into force on 15 June 2008. In<br />
the past three years <strong>Kosovo</strong> has been<br />
recognized by 70 countries, joined the<br />
International Monetary Fund (IMF) and<br />
the World Bank and is aspiring to become<br />
a full member of the European<br />
Union (EU).<br />
With such high ambitions, the trajectory<br />
of change across <strong>Kosovo</strong>’s governance<br />
structures and macro-economy<br />
has necessarily been extremely steep.<br />
Of <strong>Kosovo</strong>’s neighbours taking a similar<br />
path, none are burdened with quite<br />
such a heavy legacy of political discrimination<br />
and neglect. Most, if not<br />
all, are much further ahead. They remain<br />
an incentive to encourage <strong>Kosovo</strong>’s<br />
ongoing efforts, but also serve as<br />
a reminder of just how far there is to<br />
go.<br />
<strong>Kosovo</strong>’s significant international presence<br />
has also reconfigured itself to support<br />
the EU accession process – both<br />
financially and with a high volume of<br />
mentoring and technical assistance.<br />
Since 2000, the international community<br />
has probably invested more nonmilitary<br />
resources per capita in <strong>Kosovo</strong><br />
Introduction<br />
than in any other post-conflict arena.<br />
The EU, <strong>Kosovo</strong>’s largest donor, has announced<br />
its intention to devote more<br />
funds to <strong>Kosovo</strong> per capita than to<br />
any other place in the world over the<br />
next three years. 1 Already the EU alone<br />
has provided nearly one billion EUR<br />
to <strong>Kosovo</strong> between 2000 and 2006 2<br />
through the CARDS programme (Community<br />
Assistance for Reconstruction,<br />
<strong>Development</strong> and Stabilization) and a<br />
further 426 million EUR under the Instrument<br />
for Pre-Accession Assistance<br />
(IPA) from 2007. 3 Other development<br />
partners, including the US Government<br />
and UN agencies, funds and programmes,<br />
have provided even more<br />
with a view to remodeling <strong>Kosovo</strong>’s<br />
entire political and economic structures<br />
to align with European standards.<br />
The sheer weight of change required<br />
has created a human development<br />
conundrum. In striving for an<br />
ideal future of prosperity and stability,<br />
<strong>Kosovo</strong> risks stalling its internal human<br />
development process. The EU accession<br />
process is extremely complex,<br />
requiring a vast remodeling of legislative<br />
frameworks, compliance with<br />
a very high standard of governance<br />
and regional cooperation to maintain<br />
a fundamental philosophical cohesion<br />
across the European family. This<br />
process has brought both benefits<br />
and pressures for <strong>Kosovo</strong>’s governance<br />
structures, which have been passed on<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
| 17