17.05.2017 Views

*updatemag

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Issue #1<br />

Who let my fish loose?<br />

“Call Now”<br />

In the recent years, this notion of<br />

“life” has become more and more<br />

prominent. The whole philosophy<br />

and theory of discourse in the last<br />

century was about life, not about<br />

thinking like it was before, its quite<br />

a change, and I will be talking<br />

about this change. Why Philosophy<br />

for so long, from Plato up to the<br />

end of 19th century had actually<br />

thinking, logos and reason, for<br />

its main topic, and then suddenly<br />

the theme changed to life as the<br />

main notion. We are always speaking<br />

about reality TV, and all these<br />

things, we speak about life and<br />

we speak about the possibility of<br />

changing lives and exchanging<br />

lives, about imitating life. And all<br />

of this has presuppositions and I<br />

will try to discuss them.<br />

In our time, we are attacked<br />

form all sides by different calls<br />

to change our life. To change our<br />

body, by diet and fitness, to change<br />

our mental abilities by education<br />

and meditation. You know,<br />

now I’m living in New York, as it<br />

was already said, and I always get<br />

accustomed to a certain way that<br />

American TV presents this call. You<br />

know, when you see an advertisement<br />

for new medicine, new practise<br />

or new fitness program, at the<br />

end they always say, with a very<br />

insistent voice<br />

“Call Now!”<br />

“Please call now!”<br />

“Do not wait!”<br />

“Call now!”<br />

"Change your life! Now!"<br />

The society that is only based on<br />

differences is no longer a society, it is a<br />

market economy.<br />

This is what I want to talk about.<br />

What does this feeling of urgency<br />

mean? That we cannot delay it,<br />

that we have to do it now, we have<br />

to respond now. Every such a call<br />

proposes a sort of model that is a<br />

call to imitate socially recognised<br />

beauties, etc. And every such call<br />

for change is a call for imitation and<br />

a call to become somebody that<br />

somebody else already is. But is it<br />

possible to become another person,<br />

to follow a model to radically<br />

change our own identity to imitate<br />

another identity and if it is possible<br />

to follow this, should we follow this,<br />

so is our desire of imitation really<br />

good?<br />

First off, I would suggest that the<br />

desire to become similar to the<br />

others - the “mimetic” desire that<br />

is so criticised by many authors is<br />

actually in a certain way a positive<br />

desire. It is a desire to be social, to<br />

produce sociality. We tend to think<br />

about our society as a society of<br />

differences. We tend to think about<br />

our society as the society of differences.<br />

We have different culture<br />

identity, different professions,<br />

skills, sexual orientations etc. However,<br />

a society that is only defined<br />

by differences seizes to be a society<br />

the space of difference is not a<br />

society but an economy, and specifically<br />

market economy - that means<br />

economy of exchange. Difference<br />

13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!