*updatemag
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Issue #1<br />
Who let my fish loose?<br />
“Call Now”<br />
In the recent years, this notion of<br />
“life” has become more and more<br />
prominent. The whole philosophy<br />
and theory of discourse in the last<br />
century was about life, not about<br />
thinking like it was before, its quite<br />
a change, and I will be talking<br />
about this change. Why Philosophy<br />
for so long, from Plato up to the<br />
end of 19th century had actually<br />
thinking, logos and reason, for<br />
its main topic, and then suddenly<br />
the theme changed to life as the<br />
main notion. We are always speaking<br />
about reality TV, and all these<br />
things, we speak about life and<br />
we speak about the possibility of<br />
changing lives and exchanging<br />
lives, about imitating life. And all<br />
of this has presuppositions and I<br />
will try to discuss them.<br />
In our time, we are attacked<br />
form all sides by different calls<br />
to change our life. To change our<br />
body, by diet and fitness, to change<br />
our mental abilities by education<br />
and meditation. You know,<br />
now I’m living in New York, as it<br />
was already said, and I always get<br />
accustomed to a certain way that<br />
American TV presents this call. You<br />
know, when you see an advertisement<br />
for new medicine, new practise<br />
or new fitness program, at the<br />
end they always say, with a very<br />
insistent voice<br />
“Call Now!”<br />
“Please call now!”<br />
“Do not wait!”<br />
“Call now!”<br />
"Change your life! Now!"<br />
The society that is only based on<br />
differences is no longer a society, it is a<br />
market economy.<br />
This is what I want to talk about.<br />
What does this feeling of urgency<br />
mean? That we cannot delay it,<br />
that we have to do it now, we have<br />
to respond now. Every such a call<br />
proposes a sort of model that is a<br />
call to imitate socially recognised<br />
beauties, etc. And every such call<br />
for change is a call for imitation and<br />
a call to become somebody that<br />
somebody else already is. But is it<br />
possible to become another person,<br />
to follow a model to radically<br />
change our own identity to imitate<br />
another identity and if it is possible<br />
to follow this, should we follow this,<br />
so is our desire of imitation really<br />
good?<br />
First off, I would suggest that the<br />
desire to become similar to the<br />
others - the “mimetic” desire that<br />
is so criticised by many authors is<br />
actually in a certain way a positive<br />
desire. It is a desire to be social, to<br />
produce sociality. We tend to think<br />
about our society as a society of<br />
differences. We tend to think about<br />
our society as the society of differences.<br />
We have different culture<br />
identity, different professions,<br />
skills, sexual orientations etc. However,<br />
a society that is only defined<br />
by differences seizes to be a society<br />
the space of difference is not a<br />
society but an economy, and specifically<br />
market economy - that means<br />
economy of exchange. Difference<br />
13