01.05.2017 Views

3658925934

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Introduction<br />

Gabriel tarde ranks as one of the three most outstanding sociologists of nineteenth-century France,<br />

but, especially in recent years, he has been read less closely than either Auguste Comte or Emile<br />

Durkheim. Too often dismissed as a debator of Durkheim who lost, or the dated antecedent of Le Bon,<br />

Tarde has been stigmatized as an inchoate and imprecise philosophical or literary writer. Such<br />

misconceptions, magnified many times by distorted secondary accounts, have flourished. Remarkably<br />

few are those who have sufficiently penetrated Tarde’s work to find more than support for their<br />

preconceived notions. This volume has been prepared to facilitate a more careful examination of<br />

Tarde.<br />

Tarde contains much of value for the present-day social scientist. The famous debate with<br />

Durkheim did not in fact terminate with a clear victory for either side; each man contributed to a more<br />

sophisticated picture of the relationships between the individual and society, and in the debate one<br />

finds many issues clarified which later writers have seldom considered in such detail. Awareness of<br />

the problems raised in the debate—and the solutions of Tarde and Durkheim—heightens one’s<br />

sensitivity to basic issues of the nature and scope of sociology, problems that plague sociologists<br />

even today.<br />

One finds too, in Tarde, the elaboration of a general conceptual framework that serves to integrate<br />

middle-level theory and emipirical analysis. But the integration provided by this framework is not<br />

simply one of dry categorization: abstract formulations are skillfully combined to generate middlelevel<br />

propositions which, in turn, generally either are tested or the necessary evidence is indicated<br />

which would serve to confirm or reject them. One can observe, in Tarde’s hands, how such a general<br />

framework—one which incorporates innovation, conflict, and change as central elements—can serve<br />

as a powerful beam to bring into focus and illuminate selected empirical problems.<br />

The propositions concerning imitation and diffusion, which derive largely from this framework, are<br />

among the most stimulating of Tarde’s ideas for contemporary research. Criminologists, too, find<br />

some some of their guiding concepts in Tarde’s writings on deviance and social control. Tarde also<br />

scrutinized collective behavior, mass communication, and public opinion, not as isolated phenomena<br />

but as elements to be explained within the context of broader societal patterns. But unlike subsequent<br />

mass society theorists, Tarde integrated his discussion of macro-societal changes with those on the<br />

small group level. In this way, for example, he arrived at a two-step model of communication flow. In<br />

following Tarde through these and other problems, we can observe a versatile mind, always seeking,<br />

often reaching, the ideals that he set for the creative thinker. Finally, in presenting his thoughts Tarde<br />

offers a model of literary exposition that more contemporary writers would do well at least to<br />

consider if not to imitate.<br />

I. Life<br />

Jean-Gabriel Tarde was born in the small town of Sarlat, about one hundred miles east of Bordeaux,<br />

in 1843. 1 His father’s family was practically as old as the town, and, since the eleventh century,<br />

Tardes, or de Tardes, had served as local officials of one sort or another. (The aristocratic particle,<br />

dropped by the family in 1789 but restored in 1885, was never used by Tarde in his writings.) These<br />

traditions intrigued Tarde, and he wrote several short volumes on the family and the town, as well as<br />

editing and republishing the papers of outstanding family members. 2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!