3658925934
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
V. Methodology, Methods, and Quantification<br />
If one strength of Tarde’s formulations with regard to personality lies in demonstrating its close<br />
interdependence with social structure and culture, a second is found in his astute remarks regarding<br />
quantification and measurement. Central to Tarde’s work on personality was the belief that thinking<br />
would best advance if more attention were devoted to quantification. The opening sentence of his<br />
“Belief and Desire” asserted a basic thesis of the article: “Among many continuous dimensions that<br />
the soul seems to present us with . . . it would be scientifically desirable to isolate one or two real<br />
quantities which, while everywhere mixed with the qualitative elements of sensations, would lend<br />
themselves in theory or in practice to measurement.” 64 As core materials of personality, and as the<br />
basic elements diffusing throughout societies via the process of imitation, belief and desire, Tarde<br />
held, were the fundamental elements for social scientists to measure.<br />
Reviewing alternative methodologies for this program, Tarde finds fault with the assumptions of<br />
Bentham’s “hedonistic calculus” as well as with approaches based on probability theory. They all<br />
err, says Tarde, for the same basic reason: not only do they assume a completely logical model of<br />
attitude formation, wherein all objective advantages and disadvantages of a given course of action are<br />
rationally calculated, but they also go so far as to claim that the net result of this rational calculus is<br />
equal to a person’s attitudes. A procedure derived from these assumptions can provide the<br />
“mathematical reasons for believing,” from which point one can compute the probability that an<br />
individual will hold a certain belief. But Tarde stressed that calculating these “credibilities” or<br />
“desirabilities” behind certain beliefs or desires is by no means an adequate substitute for directly<br />
measuring them.<br />
Tarde was fascinated by the suggestive methodology of the psychophysicians for computing a<br />
mathematical relationship between the size of an objective stimulus (analogous to the “credibility” of<br />
the logicians above), and the objective response to that stimulus. 65 He did not, however, think it<br />
possible to establish a constant relationship between objective probabilities and subjective attitudes<br />
in the same way that the Fechner and Weber laws expressed the relationship between the size of an<br />
objective stimulus and a subjective response—and in this matter his position was consistent with<br />
contemporary thought on attitude measurement. 66<br />
How, then, is one to measure attitudes? One solution is to adopt a behavoristic perspective and to<br />
observe—and count—the muscular movements and other observable behaviors manifested by a<br />
person. Tarde was plainly dissatisfied with the grossness of such a solution and lamented the absence<br />
of a more precise method for measuring internal attitudes. Still, it should be stressed that unlike many<br />
of his French, 67 and particularly his German, contemporaries, 68 Tarde saw as the primary obstacles to<br />
the development of such techniques a lack of general societal interest and a paucity of research; at no<br />
point did he question the validity of such efforts on epistemological grounds. And this holds not only<br />
for the difficulties in measuring individual attitudes but also for the legitimacy of aggregating them in<br />
order to derive a measure of general public opinion. 69<br />
The practical individual is too fascinated with action and concrete behavior to investigate<br />
systematically the degrees of certainty or conviction with which people carry out a particular activity.<br />
“A desire, like an opinion, can be used to manage public or private business, by vote or notarized act,<br />
only if it is considered absolute and not relative. The man of action appears to give himself<br />
completely to everything he undertakes and indeed believes he does so.” 70<br />
On the other hand, some writers, including such eminent philosophers and littérateurs as Cournot,<br />
Renan, and Sainte-Beuve, have continually stressed the importance of the distinction between