01.05.2017 Views

3658925934

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Notes<br />

Introduction<br />

1 On Tarde’s life, see Gabriel Tarde, Introduction et pages choisies par ses fils, preface by Henri Bergson (Paris: Louis Michard,<br />

1909); Alfred Espinas, “Notice sur la vie et les œuvres de M. Gabriel de Tarde,” Séances et Travaux de l’Académie des Sciences<br />

Morales et Politiques 174 (1910), 309–422; Terry N. Clark, “Gabriel Tarde,” International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences<br />

(New York: Macmillan and Free Press, 1968).<br />

2 See the Bibliography at the end of the volume for Tarde’s publications.<br />

3 Introduction et pages choisies par ses fils.<br />

4 The character of some of these statistical activities is examined in Terry N. Clark, “Social Research and Its Institutionalization in<br />

France: A Case Study,” Indian Sociological Bulletin 4, no. 4 (July, 1967): 235–54.<br />

5 The teaching and research institutions, journals, and societies referred to here are discussed in more detail in Terry N. Clark,<br />

Institutionalization of Innovations in Higher Education: Social Research in France, 1850–1914, forthcoming.<br />

6 In contrast to a scientific modesty shown in his more serious works, this small œuvre de vulgarisation was unexcelled in its<br />

bombast. As a summary of lectures to a general public, it carries the indelible stamp of simplification and overstatement. That many<br />

writers commenting on Tarde, especially Americans, refer to him as immodest suggests that they have not gone far beyond this work—<br />

the first to be translated into English, and one too often cited by English-speaking writers as an outstanding summary of his entire<br />

contribution. No doubt Social Laws has greater unity than his longer studies and brings together ideas that are scattered throughout the<br />

longer works; but it is too often content with superficiality. The serious reader should avoid it for anything other than a brief introduction.<br />

7 A valuable collection of unpublished materials on Tarde, dealing with such matters as his nomination to the Collège de France and his<br />

relations with Bergson, is on file in the library of the Centre d’Etudes Sociologiques in Paris.<br />

8 The traditions of Cartesianism and Spontaneity are elaborated with greater detail and supporting documentation in Clark,<br />

Institutionalization of Innovations in Higher Education, chap. 1, “Culture, Social Structure, and Intellectual Currents in Nineteenth-<br />

Century France.”<br />

9 Albert Thibaudet, quoted in F. A. Hayek, The Counter-Revolution of Science (Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press, 1955), p. 113.<br />

10 M. Goyau, Comment juger la “sociologie” contemporaine (Marseilles: Editions Publioror, 1934), p. 184.<br />

11 (Paris: Mercure de France, 1911), pp. 98–100.<br />

12 See Clark, Institutionalization of Innovations, for discussion of these various clusters of researchers.<br />

13 Cf., inter alia, Tarde, “Sociology,” this volume; and Durkheim’s prefaces to the early volumes of the Année Sociologique, reprinted<br />

in translation in Emile Durkheim, 1858–1917, ed. Kurt H. Wolff (Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1960), pp. 341–353.<br />

14 Cf. Tarde, “Sociology,” this volume; Emile Durkheim, prefaces to the Année Sociologique and The Rules of Sociological<br />

Method (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1938). (First published in 1894.)<br />

15 Tarde, Social Laws (New York and London: Macmillan, 1899), pp. 30ff.<br />

16 Tarde, Preface to La logique sociale; Émile Durkheim, The Division of Labor in Society (New York: Macmillan, 1933). (First<br />

edition published in 1893.)<br />

17 These were articulated, among other places, in the four selections in Part I of the present volume; in Durkheim’s Rules of<br />

Sociological Method; and in the exchange on “Crime et santé sociale,” Revue Philosophique 39 (1895).<br />

18 As Parsons has suggested. See Talcott Parsons, The Structure of Social Action (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1937), still the best<br />

single secondary account of Durkheim.<br />

19 Especially in his Education and Sociology, The Moral Education, and The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. See also<br />

Harry Alpert, Émile Durkheim and His Sociology (New York: Columbia University Press, 1939) on this point.<br />

20 See section x, below.<br />

21 Tarde, “Two Elements of Sociology,” this volume; Durkheim, The Division of Labor in Society.<br />

22 Tarde, “Two Elements of Sociology.”<br />

23 Parsons, The Structure of Social Action.<br />

24 Ibid., chap. 2.<br />

25 J. W. Burrow, Education and Society, A Study in Victorian Social Theory (Cambridge: At the University Press, 1966)<br />

particularly stresses the utilitarian tradition in British social thought.<br />

26 See D. G. Charlton, Positivist Thought in France During the Second Empire, 1852–1870 (Oxford: Oxford University Press,<br />

1959).<br />

27 Part II, 5, below; and Gabriel Tarde, Social Laws (New York and London: Macmillan, 1899), pp. 30ff.<br />

28 Part IX, 17, below.<br />

29 Part III, 9, below.<br />

30 Part III, 10, below; Tarde, Social Laws, pp. 51ff.<br />

31 Part II, 5, below.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!