01.05.2017 Views

563489578934

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Sec. 4–17 Software Radios 297<br />

Zero-IF receivers have several advantages. They have no image response. The same<br />

zero-IF receiver hardware can be used in many different applications for manufacturing economy.<br />

Since DSP hardware is used, the effective RF bandpass characteristics and the detector<br />

characteristics are determined by DSP software. (See next section.) The software can<br />

be changed easily to match the desired application. The same zero-IF hardware can be used<br />

for receivers in different VHF and UHF bands by selecting the appropriate LO frequency<br />

(F LO = f c ) and tuning the front-end filter (usually a single-tuned circuit) to f c .<br />

The zero-IF receiver has the disadvantage of possibly leaking LO radiation out of the<br />

antenna input port due to feed-through from the mixer. Also, there will be a DC offset on the<br />

mixer output, if there is LO leakage into the antenna input since a sine wave (LO signal)<br />

multiplied by itself produces a DC term (plus an out-of-band second harmonic). The use of a<br />

high-quality balance mixer and LO shielding will minimize these problems. The receiver can<br />

also have a poor noise figure, since the front end usually is not a high-gain, low-noise stage.<br />

As in any receiver, the hardware has to be carefully designed so that there is sufficient<br />

dynamic range to prevent strong signals from overloading the receiver (producing spurious<br />

signals due to nonlinearities) and yet sufficient gain for detecting weak signals. In spite of<br />

these difficulties, the zero-IF receiver provides an economical, high-performance solution for<br />

many applications. A practical zero-IF receiver with excellent selectivity provided by DSP<br />

filtering is described in QST [Frohne, 1998].<br />

Interference<br />

A discussion of receivers would not be complete without considering some of the causes of<br />

interference. Often the owner of the receiver thinks that a certain signal, such as an amateur<br />

radio signal, is causing the difficulty. This may or may not be the case. The origin of the<br />

interference may be at any of three locations:<br />

• At the interfering signal source, a transmitter may generate out-of-band signal components<br />

(such as harmonics) that fall in the band of the desired signal.<br />

• At the receiver itself, the front end may overload or produce spurious responses. Frontend<br />

overload occurs when the RF or mixer stage of the receiver is driven into the<br />

nonlinear range by the interfering signal and the nonlinearity causes cross-modulation<br />

on the desired signal at the output of the receiver RF amplifier.<br />

• In the channel, a nonlinearity in the transmission medium may cause undesired signal<br />

components in the band of the desired signal.<br />

For more discussion of receiver design and examples of practical receiver circuits, the reader<br />

is referred to the ARRL Handbook [ARRL, 2010].<br />

4–17 SOFTWARE RADIOS<br />

Software radios use DSP hardware, microprocessors, specialized digital ICs, and software to<br />

produce modulated signals for transmission (see Table 4–1 and Fig. 4–28) and to demodulate<br />

signals at the receiver. Ultimately, the ideal software receiver would sample and digitize<br />

received signals at the antenna with analog-to-digital conversion (ADC) and process the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!