01.05.2017 Views

563489578934

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

548<br />

Performance of Communication Systems Corrupted by Noise Chap. 7<br />

7–9 COMPARISON OF ANALOG SIGNALING SYSTEMS<br />

Table 7–2 compares the analog systems that were analyzed in the previous sections. It is seen<br />

that the nonlinear modulation systems provide significant improvement in the noise performance,<br />

provided that the input signal is above the threshold. Of course, the improvement in<br />

the noise performance is obtained at the expense of having to use a wider transmission bandwidth.<br />

If the input SNR is very low, the linear systems outperform the nonlinear systems.<br />

SSB is best in terms of small bandwidth, and it has one of the best noise characteristics at<br />

low input SNR.<br />

The selection of a particular system depends on the transmission bandwidth that is<br />

allowed and the available receiver input SNR. A comparison of the noise performance of<br />

these systems is given in Fig. 7–27, with V p = 1 and For the nonlinear systems a<br />

bandwidth spreading ratio of B T /B = 12 is chosen for system comparisons. This corresponds<br />

to a b f = 5 for the FM systems cited in the figure and corresponds to commercial<br />

FM broadcasting.<br />

Note that, except for the “wasted” carrier power in AM, all of the linear modulation<br />

methods have the same SNR performance as that for the baseband system. (SSB has the same<br />

performance as DSB, because the coherence of the two sidebands in DSB compensates for the<br />

half noise power in SSB due to bandwidth reduction.) These comparisons are made on the<br />

basis of signals with equal average powers. If comparisons are made on equal peak powers<br />

(i.e., equal peak values for the signals), then SSB has a (S/N) out that is 3 dB better than DSB<br />

and 9 dB better than AM with 100% modulation (as demonstrated by Prob. 7–34). Of course,<br />

when operating above the threshold, all of the nonlinear modulation systems have better SNR<br />

performance than linear modulation systems, because the nonlinear systems have larger transmission<br />

bandwidths.<br />

Ideal System Performance<br />

What is the best noise performance that is theoretically possible? How can wide transmission<br />

bandwidth be used to gain improved noise performance? The answer is given by Shannon’s<br />

channel capacity theorem. The ideal system is defined as one that does not lose channel<br />

capacity in the detection process. Thus,<br />

C in = C out<br />

m 2 = 1 2<br />

(7–142)<br />

where C in is the bandpass channel capacity and C out is the channel capacity after detection.<br />

Using Eq. (1–10) in Eq. (7–142), we have<br />

B T log 2 [1 + (S>N) in ] = B log 2 [1 + (S>N) out ]<br />

(7–143)<br />

where B T is the transmission bandwidth of the bandpass signal at the receiver input and B is<br />

the bandwidth of the baseband signal at the receiver output. Solving for (S/N) out , we get<br />

a S N b out<br />

= c1 + a S B T >B<br />

N b d - 1<br />

in<br />

(7–144)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!