563489578934
Sec. 7–3 Coherent Detection of Bandpass Binary Signals 505 r(t)=s(t)+n(t) Receiver s r(t)= +n(t) ( 1 (t) or s 2 (t) Low-pass filter r 0 (t) Sample r 0 (t 0 ) or and N where p 0 n (f)= matched filter hold 2 H(f) ( 2 cos ( c t+¨c) (coherent reference) Baseband analog output Threshold device ~ m m ~ 0 V T r 0 Digital output (a) Receiver s(t) t r(t) t (b) OOK Signaling s(t) t r(t) t (c) BPSK Signaling Figure 7–7 Coherent detection of OOK or BPSK signals. where the PSD of n(t) is n (f ) = N 0 /2 and u n is a uniformly distributed random variable that is independent of u c . The receiving filter H(f ) of Fig. 7–7 may be some convenient LPF, or it may be a matched filter. Of course, the receiver would be optimized (for the lowest P e ) if a matched filter were used. First, evaluate the performance of a receiver that uses an LPF where the filter has a DC gain of unity. Assume that the equivalent bandwidth of the filter is B Ú 2/T, so that the
- Page 1006: ` Sec. 6-11 Study-Aid Examples 479
- Page 1010: Problems 481 SA6-4 PSD for a Bandpa
- Page 1014: Problems 483 The power of n 1 (t) i
- Page 1018: Problems 485 1 2 x (f) = e N 0, ƒ
- Page 1022: Problems 487 6-42 A bandpass WSS ra
- Page 1026: Problems 489 6-54 A narrowband-sign
- Page 1030: Problems 491 6-60 Let be a wideband
- Page 1034: Sec. 7-1 Error Probabilities for Bi
- Page 1038: Sec. 7-1 Error Probabilities for Bi
- Page 1042: Sec. 7-1 Error Probabilities for Bi
- Page 1046: Sec. 7-2 Performance of Baseband Bi
- Page 1050: Sec. 7-2 Performance of Baseband Bi
- Page 1054: Sec. 7-2 Performance of Baseband Bi
- Page 1060: 506 Performance of Communication Sy
- Page 1064: 508 Upper channel Receiver r(t)=s(t
- Page 1068: 510 Performance of Communication Sy
- Page 1072: 512 Performance of Communication Sy
- Page 1076: 514 Performance of Communication Sy
- Page 1080: 516 Performance of Communication Sy
- Page 1084: 518 DPSK signal plus noise in Bandp
- Page 1088: 520 QPSK signal plus noise (data ra
- Page 1092: TABLE 7-1 COMPARISON OF DIGITALSIGN
- Page 1096: 524 Performance of Communication Sy
- Page 1100: 526 Performance of Communication Sy
- Page 1104: 528 Performance of Communication Sy
Sec. 7–3 Coherent Detection of Bandpass Binary Signals 505<br />
r(t)=s(t)+n(t)<br />
Receiver<br />
s<br />
r(t)= +n(t)<br />
(<br />
1 (t)<br />
or<br />
s 2 (t)<br />
Low-pass filter r 0 (t) Sample r 0 (t 0 )<br />
or<br />
and<br />
N<br />
where p 0<br />
n (f)=<br />
matched filter<br />
hold<br />
2 H(f)<br />
(<br />
2 cos ( c t+¨c)<br />
(coherent reference)<br />
Baseband<br />
analog output<br />
Threshold<br />
device<br />
~ m m ~<br />
0<br />
V T<br />
r 0<br />
Digital<br />
output<br />
(a) Receiver<br />
s(t)<br />
t<br />
r(t)<br />
t<br />
(b) OOK Signaling<br />
s(t)<br />
t<br />
r(t)<br />
t<br />
(c) BPSK Signaling<br />
Figure 7–7<br />
Coherent detection of OOK or BPSK signals.<br />
where the PSD of n(t) is n (f ) = N 0 /2 and u n is a uniformly distributed random variable that<br />
is independent of u c .<br />
The receiving filter H(f ) of Fig. 7–7 may be some convenient LPF, or it may be a<br />
matched filter. Of course, the receiver would be optimized (for the lowest P e ) if a matched<br />
filter were used.<br />
First, evaluate the performance of a receiver that uses an LPF where the filter has a<br />
DC gain of unity. Assume that the equivalent bandwidth of the filter is B Ú 2/T, so that the