4569846498
Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bodies 71 2.13 Equations of motions If we consider the rigid body, Body 2, shown in Figure 2.36 we can formulate six equations of motion corresponding with the six degrees of freedom resulting from unconstrained motion. From our earlier consideration of linear momentum given in (2.161) we can write d d Σ{ F } { L } m { V G } dt d t 2 1 2 1 2 2 1 Expressing this in the familiar form of Newton’s second law we get (2.224) Σ{ F} m { A G } 2 1 2 2 1 (2.225) The vector equation given in (2.225) will thus yield the three equations associated with the translational motion of the body. It may be noted that for these equations the vectors in (2.225) may be conveniently referred to the fixed ground reference frame O 1 . In the same way that a resultant force acting on the body produces a change in linear momentum, a resultant moment will produce a change in angular momentum. If we consider the expression for angular momentum given in (2.178) we can obtain the equations of motion associated with rotational motion. For the rotational equations it is convenient to refer the vectors to the reference frame O 2 fixed in and rotating with Body 2: d d Σ{ M } { H } I dt d t [ ]{ } 2 G2 1/ 2 2 1/ 2 2 1/ 2 It can also be shown that d d { } d H2 { H2} { 2} { H2} t dt 11 / 12 / 12 / 12 / (2.226) (2.227) { M } / [ I2] / { 2} / { 2} / { H2} / G2 1 2 2 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 (2.228) Body 2 Z 2 {V G2 } 1 Z 1 X 2 O 2 G 2 Y 2 GRF {ω 2 } 1/2 X 1 O 1 Y 1 Fig. 2.36 Rigid body motion
72 Multibody Systems Approach to Vehicle Dynamics Expanding (2.228) gives ⎡M ⎢ ⎢ M ⎣⎢ M x y z ⎤ ⎡I I I ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢I I I ⎦⎥ ⎢ ⎣ I I I xx xy xz xy yy yz xz yz zz ⎤ ⎡ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎦ ⎣⎢ 2x 2y 2z ⎤ ⎡ 0 2z 2y ⎤ ⎡H ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎥ ⎢ ⎢ 2z 0 2x⎥ ⎢ H ⎦⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎣ 2y 2x 0 ⎦ ⎣⎢ H (2.229) Substituting in terms for H 2x , H 2y and H 2z now leads to the equations given in (2.230) to (2.231). For convenience we can drop the subscript for Body 2: M I I ( ) I ( ) x xx x xy y x z xz z x y 2 2 ( Izz Iyy ) yz Iyz( y z ) 2x 2y 2z ⎤ ⎥ ⎥ ⎦⎥ (2.230) M I ( ) I I ( ) y xy x y z yy y yz z x y 2 2 xx zz x z xz z x ( I I ) I ( ) (2.231) M I ( ) I ( ) z xz x y z yz y x z 2 2 zz z yy xx x y xy x y I ( I I ) I ( ) (2.232) In summary the rotational equations of motion for Body 2 may be written in vector form as Σ{ M (2.233) G2} 12 / [ I2] 22 / { 2} 12 / [ 2] 12 / [ I2] 22 / { 2} 12 / Hence we can see that in setting up the equations of motion for any rigid body the translational equations for all bodies in a system may conveniently be referred to a single fixed inertial frame O 1 . The rotational equations, however, are better referred to a body centred frame, in this case O 2 . A considerable simplification in these equations will result if frame O 2 is selected such that its axes are the principal axes of the body (I 1 I xx , I 2 I yy , I 3 I zz ) and the products of inertia are zero. The equations that result are known as Euler’s equations of motion: M x I 1 x (I 3 I 2 ) y z (2.234) M y I 2 y (I 1 I 3 ) x z (2.235) M z I 3 z (I 2 I 1 ) x y (2.236) The equations given in (2.234) to (2.236) become even simpler when the motion of a body is constrained so that rotation takes place in one plane only. If, for example, rotation about the x- and y-axes are prevented then equation (2.236) reduces to the more familiar form associated with twodimensional motion: M z I 3 z (2.237) The following example also demonstrates how gyroscopic effects associated with three-dimensional motion may be identified. If we consider the swing arm suspension system shown in Figure 2.37 we can take the suspension arm Body 2 to be constrained by a revolute joint to rotate with a constant angular velocity of 10 rad/s about the axis of the joint as shown. While this motion is in progress the road wheel, Body 3, is also rotating
- Page 44 and 45: Introduction 21 1.9 Benchmarking ex
- Page 46 and 47: 2 Kinematics and dynamics of rigid
- Page 48 and 49: Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bo
- Page 50 and 51: Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bo
- Page 52 and 53: Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bo
- Page 54 and 55: Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bo
- Page 56 and 57: Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bo
- Page 58 and 59: Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bo
- Page 60 and 61: Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bo
- Page 62 and 63: Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bo
- Page 64 and 65: Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bo
- Page 66 and 67: Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bo
- Page 68 and 69: Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bo
- Page 70 and 71: Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bo
- Page 72 and 73: Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bo
- Page 74 and 75: Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bo
- Page 76 and 77: Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bo
- Page 78 and 79: Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bo
- Page 80 and 81: Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bo
- Page 82 and 83: Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bo
- Page 84 and 85: Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bo
- Page 86 and 87: Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bo
- Page 88 and 89: Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bo
- Page 90 and 91: Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bo
- Page 92 and 93: Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bo
- Page 96 and 97: Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bo
- Page 98 and 99: 3 Multibody systems simulation soft
- Page 100 and 101: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 102 and 103: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 104 and 105: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 106 and 107: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 108 and 109: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 110 and 111: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 112 and 113: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 114 and 115: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 116 and 117: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 118 and 119: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 120 and 121: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 122 and 123: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 124 and 125: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 126 and 127: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 128 and 129: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 130 and 131: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 132 and 133: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 134 and 135: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 136 and 137: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 138 and 139: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 140 and 141: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 142 and 143: Multibody systems simulation softwa
72 Multibody Systems Approach to Vehicle Dynamics<br />
Expanding (2.228) gives<br />
⎡M<br />
⎢<br />
⎢<br />
M<br />
⎣⎢<br />
M<br />
x<br />
y<br />
z<br />
⎤ ⎡I I I<br />
⎥ ⎢<br />
⎥<br />
⎢I I I<br />
⎦⎥<br />
⎢<br />
⎣<br />
I I I<br />
xx xy xz<br />
xy yy yz<br />
xz yz zz<br />
⎤ ⎡<br />
⎥ ⎢<br />
⎥ ⎢<br />
<br />
⎥<br />
⎦ ⎣⎢<br />
<br />
2x<br />
2y<br />
2z<br />
⎤ ⎡ 0 2z<br />
2y<br />
⎤ ⎡H<br />
⎥ ⎢<br />
⎥<br />
⎥<br />
⎢ <br />
⎢<br />
2z<br />
0 2x⎥<br />
⎢<br />
H<br />
⎦⎥<br />
⎢<br />
⎥<br />
⎣<br />
2y<br />
2x<br />
0<br />
⎦ ⎣⎢<br />
H<br />
(2.229)<br />
Substituting in terms for H 2x , H 2y and H 2z now leads to the equations given<br />
in (2.230) to (2.231). For convenience we can drop the subscript for Body 2:<br />
M I I ( ) I<br />
( )<br />
x xx x xy y x z xz z x y<br />
2 2<br />
(<br />
Izz Iyy ) yz Iyz( y z<br />
)<br />
2x<br />
2y<br />
2z<br />
⎤<br />
⎥<br />
⎥<br />
⎦⎥<br />
(2.230)<br />
M I ( ) I I<br />
( )<br />
y xy x y z yy y yz z x y<br />
2 2<br />
xx zz x z xz z x<br />
(<br />
I I ) I<br />
( )<br />
(2.231)<br />
M I ( ) I<br />
( )<br />
z xz x y z yz y x z<br />
2 2<br />
zz z yy xx x y xy x y<br />
I (<br />
I I ) I<br />
( )<br />
(2.232)<br />
In summary the rotational equations of motion for Body 2 may be written<br />
in vector form as<br />
Σ{ M (2.233)<br />
G2} 12 / [ I2] 22 / { 2} 12 / [ 2] 12 / [ I2] 22 / { 2}<br />
12 /<br />
Hence we can see that in setting up the equations of motion for any rigid<br />
body the translational equations for all bodies in a system may conveniently<br />
be referred to a single fixed inertial frame O 1 . The rotational equations,<br />
however, are better referred to a body centred frame, in this case O 2 .<br />
A considerable simplification in these equations will result if frame O 2 is<br />
selected such that its axes are the principal axes of the body (I 1 I xx ,<br />
I 2 I yy , I 3 I zz ) and the products of inertia are zero. The equations that<br />
result are known as Euler’s equations of motion:<br />
M x I 1 x (I 3 I 2 ) y z (2.234)<br />
M y I 2 y (I 1 I 3 ) x z (2.235)<br />
M z I 3 z (I 2 I 1 ) x y (2.236)<br />
The equations given in (2.234) to (2.236) become even simpler when the<br />
motion of a body is constrained so that rotation takes place in one plane<br />
only. If, for example, rotation about the x- and y-axes are prevented then<br />
equation (2.236) reduces to the more familiar form associated with twodimensional<br />
motion:<br />
M z I 3 z (2.237)<br />
The following example also demonstrates how gyroscopic effects associated<br />
with three-dimensional motion may be identified. If we consider the<br />
swing arm suspension system shown in Figure 2.37 we can take the suspension<br />
arm Body 2 to be constrained by a revolute joint to rotate with a<br />
constant angular velocity of 10 rad/s about the axis of the joint as shown.<br />
While this motion is in progress the road wheel, Body 3, is also rotating