4569846498
Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bodies 51 2.6 Static force and moment definition Before progressing to the development of the equations of motion associated with large displacement rigid body dynamic motion it is necessary to examine the use of vectors for static analysis in multibody systems. In this case we define static analysis as the study of forces acting on a body or series of bodies where motion takes place in the absence of acceleration. That is a system that is either at rest or moving in a straight line with constant velocity. In order to demonstrate the use of vectors for representation of forces consider the following example, shown in Figure 2.22, which involves a tripod structure comprising three links with ball or spherical joints at each end. Before attempting any analysis to determine the distribution of forces it is necessary to prepare a free-body diagram and label the bodies and forces in an appropriate manner as shown in Figure 2.23. The notation used here to describe the forces depends on whether the force is an applied external force (action-only force) or an internal force resulting from the interconnection of bodies (action–reaction force). In this example we have an applied force at point A. In order to fully define a force we must be able to specify the point of application, the line of sight and the sense of the force. In this case we can use the notation {F A } 1 to define the force where the subscript A defines the point of application and the components of the vector F Ax , F Ay and F Az would define both the line of sight and the sense of the force. Where the force is the result of an interaction we can use, for example, the following {F A52 } 1 which specifies that the force is acting at A on Body 5 due to its interaction with Body 2. Note that for this example we are assuming that A is a point that could be, for example, taken to be at the centre of a bush or spherical joint. It should also be noted that in assigning identification numbers to the bodies we are taking Body 1 to be a fixed and unmoving body that may also be referred to as a ground body. In this example the ground body is not in one place as such but can be considered to be located at the positions B, C and D where fixed anchorages are provided. A Z 1 Y O1 1 B X 1 D {F A } 1 C Fig. 2.22 Tripod structure
52 Multibody Systems Approach to Vehicle Dynamics Body 5 A {F A } 1 {F A52 } 1 {F A54 } 1 {F A25 } 1 {F A53 } 1 {F A45 } 1 A {F A35 } 1 A Body 2 A Body 3 Body 4 B D {F D41 } 1 {F B21 } 1 {F D14 } 1 C {F B12 } 1 {F C31 } 1 B D Body 1 {F C13 } 1 C Body 1 Fig. 2.23 Body 1 Free-body diagram of tripod structure For the action–reaction forces shown here Newton’s third law would apply so that for the interaction of Body 5 and Body 2 we can say that {F A52 } 1 and {F A25 } 1 are equal and opposite or {F A52 } 1 {F A25 } 1 (2.135) In this example we are looking at linkages that are pin-jointed, or have spherical joints at each end. An example of a similar linkage would be a tie rod in a suspension system. As both ends of the linkage are pin-jointed the force by definition must act along the linkage. In this case we could use this information to reduce the number of unknowns by using a scale factor as shown in equations (2.136) to (2.138): {F A25 } 1 f 2 {R AB } 1 (2.136) {F A35 } 1 f 3 {R AC } 1 (2.137) {F A45 } 1 f 4 {R AD } 1 (2.138) In this case the solution would be assisted as the three unknowns F A25x , F A25y and F A25z , associated with equation (2.136) for example, would be reduced to a single unknown f 2 . To maintain rigour the choice of position vector, for example {R AB } 1 rather than {R BA } 1 , has also been used so that comparing
- Page 24 and 25: 1 Introduction The most cost-effect
- Page 26 and 27: Introduction 3 subsequent ‘classi
- Page 28 and 29: Introduction 5 Fig. 1.4 Linearity:
- Page 30 and 31: Introduction 7 While apparently a s
- Page 32 and 33: Introduction 9 3. The body yaws (ro
- Page 34 and 35: Introduction 11 Aspiration Definiti
- Page 36 and 37: Introduction 13 Decomposition: Synt
- Page 38 and 39: Introduction 15 The best multibody
- Page 40 and 41: Introduction 17 shows good correlat
- Page 42 and 43: Introduction 19 generated in numeri
- Page 44 and 45: Introduction 21 1.9 Benchmarking ex
- Page 46 and 47: 2 Kinematics and dynamics of rigid
- Page 48 and 49: Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bo
- Page 50 and 51: Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bo
- Page 52 and 53: Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bo
- Page 54 and 55: Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bo
- Page 56 and 57: Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bo
- Page 58 and 59: Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bo
- Page 60 and 61: Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bo
- Page 62 and 63: Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bo
- Page 64 and 65: Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bo
- Page 66 and 67: Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bo
- Page 68 and 69: Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bo
- Page 70 and 71: Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bo
- Page 72 and 73: Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bo
- Page 76 and 77: Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bo
- Page 78 and 79: Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bo
- Page 80 and 81: Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bo
- Page 82 and 83: Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bo
- Page 84 and 85: Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bo
- Page 86 and 87: Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bo
- Page 88 and 89: Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bo
- Page 90 and 91: Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bo
- Page 92 and 93: Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bo
- Page 94 and 95: Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bo
- Page 96 and 97: Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bo
- Page 98 and 99: 3 Multibody systems simulation soft
- Page 100 and 101: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 102 and 103: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 104 and 105: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 106 and 107: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 108 and 109: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 110 and 111: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 112 and 113: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 114 and 115: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 116 and 117: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 118 and 119: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 120 and 121: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 122 and 123: Multibody systems simulation softwa
52 Multibody Systems Approach to Vehicle Dynamics<br />
Body 5<br />
A<br />
{F A } 1<br />
{F A52 } 1<br />
{F A54 } 1<br />
{F A25 } 1<br />
{F A53 } 1<br />
{F A45 } 1<br />
A<br />
{F A35 } 1<br />
A<br />
Body 2<br />
A<br />
Body 3<br />
Body 4<br />
B<br />
D {F D41 } 1<br />
{F B21 } 1<br />
{F D14 } 1<br />
C<br />
{F B12 } 1<br />
{F C31 } 1<br />
B<br />
D<br />
Body 1<br />
{F C13 } 1<br />
C<br />
Body 1<br />
Fig. 2.23<br />
Body 1<br />
Free-body diagram of tripod structure<br />
For the action–reaction forces shown here Newton’s third law would apply<br />
so that for the interaction of Body 5 and Body 2 we can say that {F A52 } 1 and<br />
{F A25 } 1 are equal and opposite or<br />
{F A52 } 1 {F A25 } 1 (2.135)<br />
In this example we are looking at linkages that are pin-jointed, or have spherical<br />
joints at each end. An example of a similar linkage would be a tie rod<br />
in a suspension system. As both ends of the linkage are pin-jointed the<br />
force by definition must act along the linkage. In this case we could use this<br />
information to reduce the number of unknowns by using a scale factor as<br />
shown in equations (2.136) to (2.138):<br />
{F A25 } 1 f 2 {R AB } 1 (2.136)<br />
{F A35 } 1 f 3 {R AC } 1 (2.137)<br />
{F A45 } 1 f 4 {R AD } 1 (2.138)<br />
In this case the solution would be assisted as the three unknowns F A25x , F A25y<br />
and F A25z , associated with equation (2.136) for example, would be reduced<br />
to a single unknown f 2 . To maintain rigour the choice of position vector, for<br />
example {R AB } 1 rather than {R BA } 1 , has also been used so that comparing