4569846498
Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bodies 47 { A } d { } R R d t { } d 2 1 d t { 2 } { } PQ 1 1 PQ 1 PQ 1 Since it is known that d d { RPQ t } { VPQ } 1 1 (2.103) (2.104) d dt { } { } 2 1 2 1 (2.105) We can therefore write {A PQ } 1 { 2 } 1 {V PQ } 1 { 2 } 1 {R PQ } 1 (2.106) Since it is also known that {V PQ } 1 { 2 } 1 {R PQ } 1 (2.107) This leads to the expression {A PQ } 1 { 2 } 1 {{ 2 } 1 {R PQ } 1 } { 2 } 1 {R PQ } 1 (2.108) The acceleration vector {A PQ } 1 can be considered to have a centripetal component {APQ} p 1 and a transverse component {APQ} t 1 . This is illustrated in Figure 2.20 where one of the arms from a double wishbone suspension system is shown. In this case the centripetal component of acceleration is given by {APQ} p 1 { 2 } 1 {{ 2 } 1 {R PQ } 1 } (2.109) Note that as the suspension arm is constrained to rotate about the axis NQ, ignoring at this stage any possible deflection due to compliance in the suspension bushes, the vectors { 2 } 1 for the angular velocity of Body 2 and { 2 } 1 for the angular acceleration would act along the axis of rotation through NQ. The components of these vectors would adopt signs consistent with producing a positive rotation about this axis as shown in Figure 2.20. When setting up the equations to solve a velocity or acceleration analysis it may be desirable to reduce the number of unknowns based on the knowledge that a particular body is constrained to rotate about a known axis as Z 1 {A PQ } 1 O 1 X Y 1 1 p N {APQ } 1 Q {ω 2 } 1 {α 2 } 1 Body 2 t {A PQ } 1 {V PQ } 1 P Fig. 2.20 Centripetal and transverse components of acceleration vectors
48 Multibody Systems Approach to Vehicle Dynamics shown here. The velocity vector { 2 } 1 could, for example, be represented as follows: { 2 } 1 f 2 {R QN } 1 (2.110) In this case, since { 2 } 1 is parallel to the relative position vector {R QN } 1 a scale factor f 2 can be introduced. This would reduce the problem from the three unknown components, x 2, y 2 and z 2 of the vector { 2 } 1 to a single unknown f 2 . A similar approach could be used for an acceleration analysis with, for example, { 2 } 1 f 2 {R QN } 1 (2.111) It can also be seen from Figure 2.20 that the centripetal acceleration acts towards, and is perpendicular to the axis of rotation of the body. This relationship can be proved having found the centripetal acceleration by use of the dot product with {APQ} p 1 • {R QN } 1 0 (2.112) The transverse component of acceleration is given by {APQ} t 1 { 2 } 1 {R PQ } 1 (2.113) Note that the transverse component of acceleration is also perpendicular to, in this case, the vector {R PQ } 1 as defined by the dot product with {APQ} t 1 • {R PQ } 1 0 (2.114) Note that although the vector {A t PQ} 1 is shown to be acting in the same direction as the vector {V PQ } 1 in Figure 2.20, this may not necessarily be the case. A reversal of {A t PQ} 1 would correspond to a reversal of { 2 } 1 . This would indicate that point P is moving in a certain direction but in fact decelerating. The resultant acceleration vector {A PQ } 1 is found to give the expression shown in equation (2.115) using the triangle law to add the centripetal and transverse components as follows: {A PQ } 1 {APQ} p 1 {A t PQ} 1 (2.115) For the example shown here in Figure 2.20 the analysis may often focus on suspension movement only and assume the vehicle body to be fixed and not moving. This would mean that the velocity or acceleration at point Q, {A Q } 1 would be zero. Since we can say, based on the triangle law, that {A PQ } 1 {A P } 1 {A Q } 1 (2.116) it therefore follows in this case that since Q is fixed: {A P } 1 {A PQ } 1 (2.117) Note that the same principle could be used when solving the velocities for this problem and that we could write {V P } 1 {V PQ } 1 (2.118) Finally it should be noted for the particular example, shown here in Figure 2.20, that we could work from either point Q or point N when solving for the velocities or accelerations and obtain the same answers for the velocity or acceleration at point P. Combining the relative acceleration already obtained for points on a rigid body translating and rotating in space with sliding motion will introduce
- Page 20 and 21: Nomenclature xix O n Frame for part
- Page 22 and 23: Nomenclature xxi p Magnitude of re
- Page 24 and 25: 1 Introduction The most cost-effect
- Page 26 and 27: Introduction 3 subsequent ‘classi
- Page 28 and 29: Introduction 5 Fig. 1.4 Linearity:
- Page 30 and 31: Introduction 7 While apparently a s
- Page 32 and 33: Introduction 9 3. The body yaws (ro
- Page 34 and 35: Introduction 11 Aspiration Definiti
- Page 36 and 37: Introduction 13 Decomposition: Synt
- Page 38 and 39: Introduction 15 The best multibody
- Page 40 and 41: Introduction 17 shows good correlat
- Page 42 and 43: Introduction 19 generated in numeri
- Page 44 and 45: Introduction 21 1.9 Benchmarking ex
- Page 46 and 47: 2 Kinematics and dynamics of rigid
- Page 48 and 49: Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bo
- Page 50 and 51: Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bo
- Page 52 and 53: Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bo
- Page 54 and 55: Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bo
- Page 56 and 57: Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bo
- Page 58 and 59: Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bo
- Page 60 and 61: Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bo
- Page 62 and 63: Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bo
- Page 64 and 65: Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bo
- Page 66 and 67: Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bo
- Page 68 and 69: Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bo
- Page 72 and 73: Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bo
- Page 74 and 75: Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bo
- Page 76 and 77: Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bo
- Page 78 and 79: Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bo
- Page 80 and 81: Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bo
- Page 82 and 83: Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bo
- Page 84 and 85: Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bo
- Page 86 and 87: Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bo
- Page 88 and 89: Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bo
- Page 90 and 91: Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bo
- Page 92 and 93: Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bo
- Page 94 and 95: Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bo
- Page 96 and 97: Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bo
- Page 98 and 99: 3 Multibody systems simulation soft
- Page 100 and 101: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 102 and 103: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 104 and 105: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 106 and 107: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 108 and 109: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 110 and 111: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 112 and 113: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 114 and 115: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 116 and 117: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 118 and 119: Multibody systems simulation softwa
Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bodies 47<br />
{ A }<br />
d<br />
{ } R<br />
R<br />
d t<br />
{ } d<br />
2 <br />
1 <br />
d t<br />
{ 2<br />
} { }<br />
PQ 1 1 PQ 1 PQ 1<br />
Since it is known that<br />
d<br />
d { RPQ<br />
t<br />
} { VPQ<br />
}<br />
1 1<br />
(2.103)<br />
(2.104)<br />
d<br />
dt { }<br />
{ }<br />
2 1 2 1<br />
(2.105)<br />
We can therefore write<br />
{A PQ } 1 { 2 } 1 {V PQ } 1 { 2 } 1 {R PQ } 1 (2.106)<br />
Since it is also known that<br />
{V PQ } 1 { 2 } 1 {R PQ } 1 (2.107)<br />
This leads to the expression<br />
{A PQ } 1 { 2 } 1 {{ 2 } 1 {R PQ } 1 } { 2 } 1 {R PQ } 1 (2.108)<br />
The acceleration vector {A PQ } 1 can be considered to have a centripetal<br />
component {APQ} p 1 and a transverse component {APQ} t 1 . This is illustrated<br />
in Figure 2.20 where one of the arms from a double wishbone suspension<br />
system is shown.<br />
In this case the centripetal component of acceleration is given by<br />
{APQ} p 1 { 2 } 1 {{ 2 } 1 {R PQ } 1 } (2.109)<br />
Note that as the suspension arm is constrained to rotate about the axis NQ,<br />
ignoring at this stage any possible deflection due to compliance in the suspension<br />
bushes, the vectors { 2 } 1 for the angular velocity of Body 2 and<br />
{ 2 } 1 for the angular acceleration would act along the axis of rotation through<br />
NQ. The components of these vectors would adopt signs consistent with<br />
producing a positive rotation about this axis as shown in Figure 2.20.<br />
When setting up the equations to solve a velocity or acceleration analysis it<br />
may be desirable to reduce the number of unknowns based on the knowledge<br />
that a particular body is constrained to rotate about a known axis as<br />
Z 1<br />
{A PQ } 1<br />
O 1<br />
X<br />
Y 1 1<br />
p N<br />
{APQ } 1<br />
Q<br />
{ω 2 } 1<br />
{α 2 } 1 Body 2<br />
t<br />
{A PQ } 1<br />
{V PQ } 1<br />
P<br />
Fig. 2.20<br />
Centripetal and transverse components of acceleration vectors