01.05.2017 Views

4569846498

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Simulation output and interpretation 431<br />

where d is the allowable range for the attribute d and d is the standard<br />

deviation of the attribute d as produced by the process. If C p is greater than<br />

unity, the process is ‘capable’ and if not, it isn’t. This notion is used to<br />

assess production methods for intended tolerances and to focus attention<br />

on the least capable processes where resources are limited. As previously<br />

noted, the capability for the vehicle dynamics measurement process is<br />

questionable at best – though analytical methods improve the capabability<br />

of the process at the risk of introducing systematic inaccuracies through<br />

modelling errors and the like.<br />

As part of a design process, the idea of a signal-to-noise ratio (SN ratio)<br />

becomes much more useful. If we imagine that same manufacturing process,<br />

SN ratio is the ability of the process to produce any desired value of d.<br />

Thus, for some form of CNC machine tool, some dimension d might be<br />

anywhere from 10 mm to 500 mm. A snapshot of the device’s ability to produce,<br />

say, 276 mm is less useful than an overall knowledge of the relationship<br />

between input (desired dimension) and output (dimension produced).<br />

There are three types of ‘lack of quality’ that concern us:<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

Linearity: the proportionality of output to input. For example, if on small<br />

dimensions the stiffness of the workpiece reduced, the machine might<br />

systematically make smaller things than required but as the dimension<br />

increases this effect might become less significant.<br />

Variability: the consistency of output to input. If the machine is insufficiently<br />

stiff then random vibrations induced by the cutting action might<br />

lead to random variations in the size of the workpiece.<br />

Sensitivity: the scale of output to input. If some calibration error were present<br />

between sensors and tool positioning shafts, it could be that so-called<br />

‘millimetres’ in one axis were different to ‘millimetres’ on another axis.<br />

A fourth effect is the ability of our measuring technique to discern the output<br />

to the required resolution. If we ask for a 0.1 mm change in size of the<br />

product but can only measure to the nearest millimetre, we are unable to<br />

discern whether or not we have been successful. This, however, is a matter<br />

of good experimental or analytical technique rather than something innate<br />

in the process itself and so it is laid aside as a difficulty for the moment.<br />

To capture all three types of ‘lack of quality’, a single measure is used – the<br />

SN ratio. This is simply defined as<br />

2<br />

⎛ ⎞<br />

SN 10 log 10 ⎜ 2 ⎟<br />

⎝ ⎠<br />

(7.37)<br />

where is the sensitivity of the process (i.e. the amount the output changes<br />

for a unit input change) and is the standard deviation of the results from<br />

the nominal.<br />

To successfully use the idea of SN ratio in vehicle dynamics design, a<br />

process is required that looks something like that shown in Figure 7.30.<br />

Notice the similarity between this and Figure 1.6 in Chapter 1. This type of<br />

process is variously and vaguely known as robust design, parameter design<br />

or the Taguchi method.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!