01.05.2017 Views

4569846498

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

404 Multibody Systems Approach to Vehicle Dynamics<br />

Steer angle (degrees)<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

10<br />

20<br />

30<br />

40<br />

50<br />

RH wheel<br />

LH wheel<br />

Ackermann right<br />

Ackermann left<br />

50 40 30 20 10 0 10 20 30 40 50<br />

Average steer angle ve right (degrees)<br />

100<br />

% Ackermann<br />

80<br />

RH wheel<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

20<br />

50 40 30 20 10 0 10 20 30 40 50<br />

Mean steer angle ve right (degrees)<br />

Fig. 7.7<br />

Steering geometry in comparison with Ackermann/Jeantaud geometry<br />

the significance is sometimes overstated. Considering Figure 7.5, a turn at<br />

50 mph (22 ms 1 ) road speed at 0.4g lateral acceleration may be calculated<br />

as producing a yaw rate of 10.2 degrees/second. For a 2.7 m wheelbase<br />

vehicle, this requires a mean steer angle of 1.26 degrees. The radius of turn is<br />

123 m and so the Jeantaud modification gives 1.25018 degrees on the inner<br />

wheel and 1.26552 degrees on the outer wheel – an included angle of 0.015<br />

degrees. For a typical cornering stiffness of 1500 N/degree, this gives<br />

a lateral force variation of 23 N between 0% Ackermann and 100%<br />

Ackermann. The lateral forces to achieve 0.4g at 50 mph are over 5900 N<br />

for a typical 1500 kg vehicle, so the Ackermann effect amounts for lateral<br />

forces of some 0.4% of the total – a small modifier on the vehicle as a whole.<br />

The level of Ackermann effect does come into play at parking speeds, however.<br />

Typically, there is some inclination of the vehicle’s steering axis when<br />

viewed from the front and side of the vehicle. These inclinations are known<br />

as castor and steer axis inclination (SAI), or kingpin inclination (KPI)<br />

respectively and are shown in Figure 7.8. Together with the offsets at<br />

ground level between the geometric centre of the wheel, these inclinations<br />

have the effect of moving the inboard wheel down and the outboard wheel<br />

up. Figure 7.9 shows the inboard wheel being moved down as it goes onto<br />

back lock. Given the constraint of the ground, this has the effect of imposing<br />

a roll moment on the vehicle that is reacted by the front and rear suspensions<br />

in series (Figure 7.10). The loading of the vehicle wheels becomes<br />

asymmetric.<br />

This asymmetry is of the order of 10 N in a typical family saloon and is of<br />

little consequence. However, in a more stiffly sprung vehicle if the steering

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!