01.05.2017 Views

4569846498

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Modelling and assembly of the full vehicle 369<br />

Fig. 6.44 Pilot Induced Oscillation (PIO) – not exclusively an aeronautical<br />

phenomenon<br />

PIO is caused when the operator is unable to recognize the effects of small<br />

control inputs and therefore increases those inputs, before realizing they<br />

were excessive and reversing them through a similar process. It is analogous<br />

to the ‘excess proportional control gain oscillation’ discussed in classical<br />

control theory (Leva et al., 2002). For road vehicles, drivers most<br />

likely to induce PIO in steering tend to be inexperienced or anxious drivers<br />

travelling at a speed with which they are uncomfortable. This type of PIO<br />

is not to be confused with the typical experience of drivers of skidding<br />

vehicles when the initial skid is corrected but the vehicle subsequently<br />

‘fishtails’ or simply departs in the opposite direction – this is a ‘phasing at<br />

resonance’ control error. The driver fails to apply a ‘feed forward’ (open<br />

loop, knowledge-based) correction in advance of the vehicle’s response to<br />

compensate for the delay in vehicle response.<br />

PIO also occurs in tractive (i.e. throttle) control inputs and is the reason<br />

even experienced drivers are incapable of travelling at a constant speed on<br />

highways; perception of changes in following distance is universally poor.<br />

If too little attention is spent on the driving task or if insufficient following<br />

distance is left, these PIOs become successively amplified by following<br />

drivers until the speed variation results in a ‘shunt’ accident. Radar-based<br />

cruise control systems will alleviate this risk but are no substitute for attentive<br />

driving while anything less than the whole vehicle fleet is fitted with it.<br />

6.13.1 Steering controllers<br />

There are a variety of controller models suitable for modelling driver behaviour<br />

in existence. Some, such as ADAMS/Driver developed as part of the<br />

MSC.ADAMS modelling package, are very complete – others, such as the<br />

two-loop feedback control model used by the authors, are simpler. The analyst<br />

must consider the needs of the simulation (and the financial constraints<br />

of the company) and choose the most appropriate level of modelling to<br />

achieve the task at hand. Driver models in general fall into two categories:<br />

(1) Optimum control models. Optimum control models use some form<br />

of ‘penalty function’ – a measure used to assess the quality of control<br />

achieved. For example, for a vehicle steering model the appropriate variable<br />

might be lateral deviation from the intended path. Optimum control models<br />

use repeated simulations of the event and numerical optimization methods<br />

to ‘tune’ the parameters for a control system to minimize the value(s) of the<br />

penalty function(s) over the duration of the event of interest. For learned

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!