01.05.2017 Views

4569846498

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Modelling and assembly of the full vehicle 355<br />

10000<br />

3000<br />

Axle load (N)<br />

8000<br />

6000<br />

4000<br />

2000<br />

Front axle load<br />

Rear axle load<br />

0<br />

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1<br />

Ideal rear axle brake force (N)<br />

Ideal<br />

2000<br />

Typical<br />

1000<br />

0<br />

0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000<br />

Deceleration (g)<br />

Front axle brake force (N)<br />

Fig. 6.30<br />

Force distribution for ideal and typical braking events<br />

the vehicle, such as drive or transmission clutches. Typical values of the<br />

convection constant hAc are around 150 W K 1 for a front disc brake installation,<br />

around 80 W K 1 for a rear brake installation and as low as 20 W K 1<br />

for a rear drum brake.<br />

A further key factor in modelling brake performance is the distribution of<br />

brake torques around the vehicle. While decelerating, the vertical loads on<br />

the axles change as described in section 4.8.1 due to the fact that the mass<br />

centre of the vehicle is above the ground.<br />

It may be presumed that for ideal braking, the longitudinal forces should be<br />

distributed according to the vertical forces. Using the above expressions,<br />

the graphs in Figure 6.30 can be calculated for vertical axle load versus<br />

deceleration. Knowing the total force necessary to decelerate the vehicle it<br />

is possible to calculate the horizontal forces for ‘ideal’ (i.e. matched to vertical<br />

load distribution) deceleration. Plotting rear force against front force<br />

leads to the characteristic curve shown in Figure 6.30. However, in general<br />

it is not possible to arrange for such a distribution of force and so the typical<br />

installed force distribution is something like that shown by the dashed<br />

line in the figure. Note that the ideal distribution of braking force varies<br />

with loading condition and so many vehicles have a brake force distribution<br />

that varies with vehicle loading condition. For more detailed information<br />

on brake system performance and design, Limpert (1999) gives<br />

a detailed breakdown of performance characteristics and behaviour, all<br />

of which may be incorporated within a multibody system model of the<br />

vehicle using an approach similar to that shown in Table 6.1 if desired.<br />

Described in some detail in Limpert’s work is the function of a vehicle<br />

ABS system. The key ingredient of such a system is the ability to control<br />

brake pressure in one of three modes, often described as ‘hold, dump<br />

and pump’. Hold is fairly self-explanatory, the wheel cylinder pressure is<br />

maintained regardless of further demanded increases in pressure from the<br />

driver’s pedal. ‘Dump’ is a controlled reduction in pressure, usually<br />

at a predetermined rate and ‘pump’ is a controlled increase in pressure,<br />

again usually at a predetermined rate.<br />

The main variable is the brake pressure p. In the work by Ozdalyan (1998) a<br />

slip control model was initially developed as a precursor to the implementation<br />

of an ABS model. This is illustrated in Figure 6.31 where it can be seen<br />

that on initial application of the brakes the brake force rises approximately

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!