4569846498

01.05.2017 Views

Modelling and assembly of the full vehicle 339 6.5 Modelling of springs and dampers 6.5.1 Treatment in simple models The treatment of road springs and dampers in a vehicle where the suspensions have been modelled using linkages is generally straightforward. A road spring is often modelled as linear but the damper will usually require a non-linear representation as discussed in Chapter 3. It is also common for the bump travel limiter to be engaged early and to have both stiffness and damping elements to its behaviour; both those aspects may be modelled using the methods discussed here. The choice of whether to combine them with the road spring and damper forces is entirely one of modelling convenience; the authors generally find the ease of debugging and auditing the model is worth the carriage of two not strictly necessary additional force generating terms. For the simplified modelling approach used in the lumped mass and swing arm models the road springs cannot be directly installed in the vehicle model as with the linkage model. Consider the lumped mass model when compared with the linkage model as shown in Figure 6.13. Clearly there is a mechanical advantage effect in the linkage model that is not present in the lumped mass vehicle model. At a given roll angle for the lumped mass model the displacement and hence the force in the spring will be too large when compared with the corresponding situation in the linkage model. For the swing arm model the instant centre about which the suspension pivots is often on the other side of the vehicle. In this case the displacement in the spring is approximately the same as at the wheel and a similar problem occurs as with the lumped mass model. For all three simplified models this LINKAGE MODEL LUMPED MASS MODEL δ s (I s /I w )δ w δ s δ w δ s l s δ w δ s δ w l w Fig. 6.13 Road spring in linkage and lumped mass models

340 Multibody Systems Approach to Vehicle Dynamics Equivalent spring acting at the wheel centre k w l w F s k s F w δ s δ w l s Fig. 6.14 Equivalent spring acting at the wheel centre problem can be overcome as shown in Figure 6.14 by using an ‘equivalent’ spring which acts at the wheel centre. As an approximation, ignoring exact suspension geometry, the expression (6.2) can be used to represent the stiffness k w of the equivalent spring at the wheel: k F / ( l / l ) F/( l / l ) ( l / l ) 2 k w w w s w s w s s s w s (6.2) The presence of a square function in the ratio can be considered a combination of both the extra mechanical advantage in moving the definition of spring stiffness to the wheel centre and the extra spring deflection at the wheel centre. 6.5.2 Modelling leaf springs Although the modelling of leaf springs is now rare on passenger cars they are still fitted extensively on light trucks and goods vehicles where they offer the advantage of providing relatively constant rates of stiffness for large variations in load at the axle. The modelling of leaf springs has always been more of a challenge in an MBS environment when compared with the relative simplicity of modelling a coil spring. Several approaches may be adopted the most common of which are shown in Figure 6.15. Early attempts at modelling leaf springs utilized the simple approach based on equivalent springs to represent the vertical and longitudinal force– displacement characteristic of the leaf spring. On the actual vehicle the leaf springs also contribute to the lateral positioning of the axle, with possible additional support from a panhard rod. Although not shown in Figure 6.15 lateral springs could also be incorporated to represent this.

Modelling and assembly of the full vehicle 339<br />

6.5 Modelling of springs and dampers<br />

6.5.1 Treatment in simple models<br />

The treatment of road springs and dampers in a vehicle where the suspensions<br />

have been modelled using linkages is generally straightforward. A<br />

road spring is often modelled as linear but the damper will usually require<br />

a non-linear representation as discussed in Chapter 3. It is also common for<br />

the bump travel limiter to be engaged early and to have both stiffness and<br />

damping elements to its behaviour; both those aspects may be modelled<br />

using the methods discussed here. The choice of whether to combine them<br />

with the road spring and damper forces is entirely one of modelling convenience;<br />

the authors generally find the ease of debugging and auditing the<br />

model is worth the carriage of two not strictly necessary additional force<br />

generating terms.<br />

For the simplified modelling approach used in the lumped mass and swing<br />

arm models the road springs cannot be directly installed in the vehicle<br />

model as with the linkage model. Consider the lumped mass model when<br />

compared with the linkage model as shown in Figure 6.13.<br />

Clearly there is a mechanical advantage effect in the linkage model that is<br />

not present in the lumped mass vehicle model. At a given roll angle for the<br />

lumped mass model the displacement and hence the force in the spring will<br />

be too large when compared with the corresponding situation in the linkage<br />

model.<br />

For the swing arm model the instant centre about which the suspension pivots<br />

is often on the other side of the vehicle. In this case the displacement in the<br />

spring is approximately the same as at the wheel and a similar problem<br />

occurs as with the lumped mass model. For all three simplified models this<br />

LINKAGE MODEL<br />

LUMPED MASS MODEL<br />

δ s (I s /I w )δ w<br />

δ s<br />

δ w<br />

δ s<br />

l s<br />

δ w<br />

δ s δ w<br />

l w<br />

Fig. 6.13<br />

Road spring in linkage and lumped mass models

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!