01.05.2017 Views

4569846498

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

338 Multibody Systems Approach to Vehicle Dynamics<br />

If we consider first the kinematic effects due to suspension geometry we<br />

can see that there are two variables that provide input to the model:<br />

z is the change in wheel centre vertical position (wheel travel)<br />

v is the change in steering wheel angle<br />

The magnitude of the wheel travel z will depend on the deformation of<br />

the surface, the load acting vertically through the tyre resulting from<br />

weight transfer during a simulated manoeuvre and a representation of the<br />

suspension stiffness and damping acting through the wheel centre. The<br />

magnitude of the change in steering wheel angle v will depend on either<br />

an open loop fixed time dependent rotational motion input or a closed loop<br />

torque input using a controller to feed back vehicle position variables so as<br />

to steer the vehicle to follow a predefined path. The modelling of steering<br />

inputs is discussed in more detail later in this chapter. The dependent variables<br />

that dictate the position and orientation of the road wheel are:<br />

x is the change in longitudinal position of the wheel<br />

y is the change in lateral position (half-track) of the wheel<br />

is the change in steer angle (toe in/out) of the wheel<br />

is the change in camber angle of the wheel<br />

The functional dependencies that dictate how the suspension moves with<br />

respect to the input variables can be obtained through experimental rig<br />

measurements, if the vehicle exists and is to be used as a basis for the<br />

model, or by performing simulation with suspension models as described<br />

in Chapter 4. For example, the dependence of camber angle on wheel<br />

travel can be derived from the curves plotted for Case study 1 in Chapter 4.<br />

The movement of the suspension due to elastic effects is dependent on the<br />

forces acting on the wheel. In their paper Scapaticci and Minen (1992)<br />

describe the relationship using the equation shown in (6.1) where the functional<br />

dependencies due to suspension compliance are defined using the<br />

matrix F E :<br />

⎡x⎤<br />

⎡<br />

⎢<br />

y<br />

⎥ ⎢<br />

⎢ ⎥ ⎢F<br />

⎢⎥<br />

⎢<br />

⎢ ⎥ ⎢<br />

⎣⎦<br />

⎣<br />

E<br />

⎤ ⎡ Fxt ⎤<br />

⎥ ⎢<br />

Fxb<br />

⎥<br />

⎥ ⎢ ⎥<br />

⎥ ⎢ Fy ⎥<br />

⎥ ⎢ ⎥<br />

⎦ ⎣ Mz ⎦<br />

(6.1)<br />

and the inputs are the forces acting on the tyre:<br />

Fxt is the longitudinal tractive force<br />

Fxb is the longitudinal braking force<br />

Fy is the lateral force<br />

Mz is the self-aligning moment<br />

Note that the dimensions of the matrix F E are such that cross-coupling<br />

terms, such as toe change under braking force, can exist. The availability of<br />

such data early in the design phase can be difficult but the adoption of such<br />

a generalized form allows the user to speculate on such values and thus use<br />

the model to set targets for acceptable behaviour.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!