4569846498
Modelling and assembly of the full vehicle 335 6.4.4 Swing arm model This model is developed from the equivalent roll stiffness mass model by using revolute joints to allow the suspensions for all four wheels to ‘swing’ relative to the vehicle body rather than using the suspensions linked on an axle. The revolute joints are located at the instant centres of the actual suspension linkage assembly. These positions are found by modelling the suspensions separately as described in Chapter 4. The swing arm model has an advantage over the roll centre model in that it allows the wheels to change camber angle independently of each other and relative to the vehicle body. The swing arm model is shown schematically in Figure 6.9. Although in the sketch the swing arms are shown with an axis parallel to the vehicle axis this need not be so in general. Also, although in the sketch the swing arms are shown as a ‘plausible’ mechanical arrangement (i.e. not overlapping) this also need not be so; in general contact between elements is not modelled for vehicle dynamics studies and in general the instant centres are widely spaced and not necessarily within the physical confines of the vehicle body. The swing arm model has the advantage over the equivalent roll stiffness model in that the heave and pitch ride behaviour can be included. 6.4.5 Linkage model The model based on linkages as shown in Figure 6.10 is the model that most closely represents the actual vehicle. This sort of vehicle model is the Fig. 6.10 Linkage model ‘as is’ approach
336 Multibody Systems Approach to Vehicle Dynamics most common approach adopted by MSC.ADAMS users in the automotive industry often extending the model definition to include full non-linear bush characteristics. A simplification of a model based on linkages is to treat the joints as rigid and generate a kinematic representation of the suspension system. As described in Chapter 4 a double wishbone arrangement is typical of a suspension system that can be modelled in this way and used for handling simulations (Pilling, 1995). 6.4.6 The concept suspension approach In addition to the four suspension modelling approaches just described another form of suspension model simplification (Scapaticci and Minen, 1992) considers an approach where the model contains no elements representing a physical connection between the road wheel and the chassis. Instead the movement of the road wheel with respect to the chassis is described by a functional representation, which describes the wheel centre Start with desired vehicle characteristics Trailing arm Double wishbone McPherson strut Using a concept suspension system find desired suspension characteristics Run optimization in MSC.ADAMS Select suspension type Suspension with desired characteristics Fig. 6.11 Application of a Concept Suspension model (provided courtesy of MSC.Software)
- Page 308 and 309: Tyre characteristics and modelling
- Page 310 and 311: Tyre characteristics and modelling
- Page 312 and 313: Tyre characteristics and modelling
- Page 314 and 315: Tyre characteristics and modelling
- Page 316 and 317: Tyre characteristics and modelling
- Page 318 and 319: Tyre characteristics and modelling
- Page 320 and 321: Tyre characteristics and modelling
- Page 322 and 323: Tyre characteristics and modelling
- Page 324 and 325: Tyre characteristics and modelling
- Page 326 and 327: Tyre characteristics and modelling
- Page 328 and 329: Tyre characteristics and modelling
- Page 330 and 331: Tyre characteristics and modelling
- Page 332 and 333: Tyre characteristics and modelling
- Page 334 and 335: Tyre characteristics and modelling
- Page 336 and 337: Tyre characteristics and modelling
- Page 338 and 339: Tyre characteristics and modelling
- Page 340 and 341: Tyre characteristics and modelling
- Page 342 and 343: Tyre characteristics and modelling
- Page 344 and 345: Tyre characteristics and modelling
- Page 346 and 347: Tyre characteristics and modelling
- Page 348 and 349: Tyre characteristics and modelling
- Page 350 and 351: Modelling and assembly of the full
- Page 352 and 353: Modelling and assembly of the full
- Page 354 and 355: Modelling and assembly of the full
- Page 356 and 357: Modelling and assembly of the full
- Page 360 and 361: Modelling and assembly of the full
- Page 362 and 363: Modelling and assembly of the full
- Page 364 and 365: Modelling and assembly of the full
- Page 366 and 367: Modelling and assembly of the full
- Page 368 and 369: Modelling and assembly of the full
- Page 370 and 371: Modelling and assembly of the full
- Page 372 and 373: Modelling and assembly of the full
- Page 374 and 375: Modelling and assembly of the full
- Page 376 and 377: Modelling and assembly of the full
- Page 378 and 379: Modelling and assembly of the full
- Page 380 and 381: Modelling and assembly of the full
- Page 382 and 383: Modelling and assembly of the full
- Page 384 and 385: Modelling and assembly of the full
- Page 386 and 387: Modelling and assembly of the full
- Page 388 and 389: Modelling and assembly of the full
- Page 390 and 391: Modelling and assembly of the full
- Page 392 and 393: Modelling and assembly of the full
- Page 394 and 395: Modelling and assembly of the full
- Page 396 and 397: Modelling and assembly of the full
- Page 398 and 399: Modelling and assembly of the full
- Page 400 and 401: Modelling and assembly of the full
- Page 402 and 403: Modelling and assembly of the full
- Page 404 and 405: Modelling and assembly of the full
- Page 406 and 407: Modelling and assembly of the full
336 Multibody Systems Approach to Vehicle Dynamics<br />
most common approach adopted by MSC.ADAMS users in the automotive<br />
industry often extending the model definition to include full non-linear<br />
bush characteristics.<br />
A simplification of a model based on linkages is to treat the joints as rigid<br />
and generate a kinematic representation of the suspension system. As<br />
described in Chapter 4 a double wishbone arrangement is typical of a suspension<br />
system that can be modelled in this way and used for handling simulations<br />
(Pilling, 1995).<br />
6.4.6 The concept suspension approach<br />
In addition to the four suspension modelling approaches just described<br />
another form of suspension model simplification (Scapaticci and Minen,<br />
1992) considers an approach where the model contains no elements representing<br />
a physical connection between the road wheel and the chassis.<br />
Instead the movement of the road wheel with respect to the chassis is<br />
described by a functional representation, which describes the wheel centre<br />
Start with<br />
desired vehicle<br />
characteristics<br />
Trailing<br />
arm<br />
Double<br />
wishbone<br />
McPherson<br />
strut<br />
Using a concept<br />
suspension<br />
system find desired<br />
suspension<br />
characteristics<br />
Run optimization<br />
in MSC.ADAMS<br />
Select<br />
suspension type<br />
Suspension with<br />
desired<br />
characteristics<br />
Fig. 6.11 Application of a Concept Suspension model (provided courtesy of<br />
MSC.Software)