4569846498

01.05.2017 Views

Tyre characteristics and modelling 317 Applied force equal to required wheel load 04 02 REV REV 03 MOTION input controls the camber angle γ of the wheel CYL MOTION input controls the slip angle α of the wheel TRANS 05 MOTION input controls the forward velocity of the wheel Tyre model forces Road surface Fig. 5.70 MSC.ADAMS model of a flat bed tyre test machine. (This material has been reproduced from the Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, K1 Vol. 214 ‘The modelling and simulation of vehicle handling. Part 3: tyre modelling’, M.V. Blundell, page 17, by permission of the Council of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers) Table 5.4 Degree-of-freedom balance equation for the tyre rig model Model component DOF Number Total DOF Parts 6 4 24 Revolutes 5 2 10 Translational 5 1 5 Cylindrical 4 1 4 Motions 1 3 3 DOF 2 The joint controlling camber angle can be located at the tyre contact patch rather than at the wheel centre. This will avoid introducing lateral velocity and hence slip angle for the change in camber angle during a dynamic simulation. The model of the tyre test machine has 2 rigid body degrees of freedom as demonstrated by the calculation of the degree of freedom balance in Table 5.4. One degree of freedom is associated with the spin motion of the tyre, which is dependent on the longitudinal forces generated and the slip ratio. The other degree of freedom is the height of the wheel centre above the road, which is controlled by the applied force representing the wheel load. The tyre test rig model has been used to read the tyre model data files used in a study (Blundell, 2000a) to plot tyre force and moment graphs. The graphics of the tyre rig model are shown in Figure 5.71.

318 Multibody Systems Approach to Vehicle Dynamics Fig. 5.71 Computer graphics for the tyre rig model 5.8 Examples of tyre model data The results obtained from a series of tyre tests (Blundell, 2000a) have been used to set up the data needed for the various modelling approaches described here. In summary the following procedure was followed: (i) For the Interpolation method the measured numerical values were reformatted directly into the SPLINE statements within an MSC.ADAMS data file as shown in Table 5.5. For each spline shown in Table 5.5 the X values correspond to either the slip or camber angle and are measured in degrees. The first value in each Y array corresponds to the vertical load measured in kg. The following values in the Y arrays are the measured lateral forces (N) or the aligning moments (Nm) which correspond with the matching slip or camber angles in the X arrays. All the required conversions to the vehicle model units are carried out in the FORTRAN subroutine for the Interpolation tyre model listed in Appendix B. (ii) The coefficients for the ‘Magic Formula’ model were provided by Dunlop Tyres using in-house software to fit the values. The ‘Magic Formula’ tyre model (version 3) parameters are shown in Table 5.9. It should be noted that the parameters due to camber effects were not available from this set of tests. (iii) The parameters for the Fiala model were obtained by simple measurements from the plots produced during tyre testing. The Fiala model requires a single value of cornering stiffness to be defined although in reality cornering stiffness varies with tyre load. For the purposes of comparing the tyre models the parameters for the Fiala tyre model shown in Table 5.6 have been derived from the test data at the average of the front and rear wheel loads of the vehicle considered in this study. Fiala parameters obtained at front and rear wheel loads are given in Tables 5.7 and 5.8. Using the data for each of these models the tyre rig model described in the previous section was run for vertical loads of 200, 400, 600 and 800 kg. In each case the slip angle was varied between plus and minus 10 degrees.

Tyre characteristics and modelling 317<br />

Applied force equal to<br />

required wheel load<br />

04<br />

02<br />

REV<br />

REV<br />

03<br />

MOTION input controls<br />

the camber angle γ of<br />

the wheel<br />

CYL<br />

MOTION input controls the<br />

slip angle α of the wheel<br />

TRANS<br />

05<br />

MOTION input controls<br />

the forward velocity of<br />

the wheel<br />

Tyre model<br />

forces<br />

Road surface<br />

Fig. 5.70 MSC.ADAMS model of a flat bed tyre test machine. (This material has<br />

been reproduced from the Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers,<br />

K1 Vol. 214 ‘The modelling and simulation of vehicle handling. Part 3: tyre<br />

modelling’, M.V. Blundell, page 17, by permission of the Council of the Institution<br />

of Mechanical Engineers)<br />

Table 5.4<br />

Degree-of-freedom balance equation for the tyre rig model<br />

Model component DOF Number Total DOF<br />

Parts 6 4 24<br />

Revolutes 5 2 10<br />

Translational 5 1 5<br />

Cylindrical 4 1 4<br />

Motions 1 3 3<br />

DOF 2<br />

The joint controlling camber angle can be located at the tyre contact patch<br />

rather than at the wheel centre. This will avoid introducing lateral velocity and<br />

hence slip angle for the change in camber angle during a dynamic simulation.<br />

The model of the tyre test machine has 2 rigid body degrees of freedom as<br />

demonstrated by the calculation of the degree of freedom balance in Table 5.4.<br />

One degree of freedom is associated with the spin motion of the tyre, which<br />

is dependent on the longitudinal forces generated and the slip ratio. The<br />

other degree of freedom is the height of the wheel centre above the road,<br />

which is controlled by the applied force representing the wheel load.<br />

The tyre test rig model has been used to read the tyre model data files used<br />

in a study (Blundell, 2000a) to plot tyre force and moment graphs. The<br />

graphics of the tyre rig model are shown in Figure 5.71.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!