01.05.2017 Views

4569846498

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Tyre characteristics and modelling 301<br />

5.6.5 The ‘Magic Formula’ tyre model<br />

The tyre model which is now most well established and has generally<br />

gained favour is based on the work by Pacejka and as mentioned earlier is<br />

referred to as the ‘Magic Formula’. The ‘Magic Formula’ is not a predictive<br />

tyre model but is used to represent the tyre force and moment curves<br />

and is undergoing continual development. The early version (Bakker et al.,<br />

1986, 1989) is sometimes referred to as the ‘Monte Carlo version’ due to<br />

the conference location at which this model was presented in the 1989<br />

paper. The tyre models discussed here are based on the formulations<br />

described in Bakker et al. (1989) and a later version (Pacejka and Bakker,<br />

1993) referred to as version 3 of the ‘Magic Formula’. Other authors have<br />

developed systems based around the ‘Magic Formula’. The BNPS model<br />

(Schuring et al., 1993) is a particular version of the ‘Magic Formula’ that<br />

automates the development of the coefficients working from measured test<br />

data. The model name BNPS is in honour of Messrs Bakker, Nyborg and<br />

Pacejka who originated the ‘Magic Formula’ and the S indicates the particular<br />

implementation developed by Smithers Scientific Services Inc.<br />

In the original ‘Magic Formula’ paper Bakker et al. (1986) discuss the use<br />

of formulae to represent the force and moment curves using established<br />

techniques based on polynomials or a Fourier series. The main disadvantage<br />

with this approach is that the coefficients used have no engineering<br />

significance in terms of the tyre properties and as with interpolation<br />

methods the model would not lend itself to design activities. This is also<br />

reflected in Sitchen (1983) where the author describes a representation<br />

based on polynomials where the curves are divided into five regions but<br />

this still has the problem of using coefficients which do not typify the tyre<br />

force and moment characteristics.<br />

The general acceptance of the ‘Magic Formula’ is reinforced by the work<br />

carried out at Michelin and described in Bayle et al. (1993). In this paper<br />

the authors describe how the ‘Magic Formula’ has been tested at Michelin<br />

and ‘industrialized’ as a self-contained package for the pure lateral force<br />

model. The authors also considered modifications to the ‘Magic Formula’<br />

to deal with the complicated situation of combined slip.<br />

The ‘Magic Formula’ model is undergoing continual development, which<br />

is reflected in a further publication (Pacejka and Besselink, 1997) where<br />

the model is not restricted to small values of slip and the wheel may also run<br />

backwards. The authors also discuss a relatively simple model for longitudinal<br />

and lateral transient responses restricted to relatively low time and<br />

path frequencies. The tyre model in this paper also acquired a new name<br />

and is referred to as the ‘Delft Tyre 97’ version.<br />

The ‘Magic Formula’ has been developed using mathematical functions<br />

that relate:<br />

(i) The lateral force F y as a function of slip angle <br />

(ii) The aligning moment M z as a function of slip angle <br />

(iii) The longitudinal force F x as a function of longitudinal slip <br />

When these curves are obtained from steady state tyre testing and plotted<br />

the general shape of the curves is similar to that indicated in Figure 5.57.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!