01.05.2017 Views

4569846498

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

202 Multibody Systems Approach to Vehicle Dynamics<br />

ride modes much above 2.5 Hz, even quite aggressively suspended ones.<br />

There is thus a ‘window’ in which we position the primary ride behaviour<br />

of our vehicles to make them compatible with the operators.<br />

For autonomous vehicles that never carry humans, these restrictions are<br />

relaxed and the suspension primary ride frequency can be chosen on the<br />

basis of some other functional aspect.<br />

4.10 Case study 5 – Suspension vector analysis<br />

comparison with MBS<br />

4.10.1 Problem definition<br />

The following study is intended to demonstrate the application of the vector<br />

theory outlined in Chapter 2 to a range of suspension analyses. Before<br />

the advent of computer programs to analyse the motion of suspension linkages<br />

vehicle designers resorted to graphical methods or simplified calculations<br />

often using two-dimensional representations to study the suspension<br />

in a fore–aft or transverse plane. These methods are still taught and<br />

included in many texts addressing vehicle dynamics. They can develop an<br />

understanding of suspension design, and the effect on total vehicle performance,<br />

that can be lost using the automated methods in modern computer<br />

aided analysis.<br />

The aim of this textbook is to bridge the gap between traditional vehicle<br />

dynamics theories and the multibody systems approach. The following calculations<br />

are typical of the processes carried out using MBS software.<br />

While the methods used here do not represent exactly the internal machinations<br />

of, for example, the MSC.ADAMS software they do give an indication<br />

of the computational process involved. The example chosen here is<br />

based on a typical double wishbone suspension system. The answers<br />

obtained are compared with those running an MSC.ADAMS model using<br />

the same data. The calculations will include a series of analyses including:<br />

● Geometry analysis<br />

● Velocity analysis<br />

● Acceleration analysis<br />

● Static force analysis<br />

● Dynamic force analysis<br />

The geometric data required to define this problem is defined in Figure<br />

4.67. Note that in this example the x-axis is orientated towards the front of<br />

the vehicle rather than pointing to the rear as used generally throughout this<br />

text. This is therefore the front left suspension system on the vehicle.<br />

4.10.2 Velocity analysis<br />

The starting point for this analysis is to establish a boundary condition, or<br />

road input, at the tyre contact patch P as the vehicle negotiates the road<br />

hump shown in Figure 4.68 with a forward speed of 15 m/s. The analysis is

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!