01.05.2017 Views

4569846498

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

198 Multibody Systems Approach to Vehicle Dynamics<br />

case 4<br />

25.0<br />

20.0<br />

15.0<br />

10.0<br />

Body position<br />

5.0<br />

0.0<br />

Wheel position<br />

5.0<br />

10.0<br />

15.0<br />

20.0<br />

25.0<br />

0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0<br />

Analysis Last_Run<br />

Time (s)<br />

Length (mm) Length (mm)<br />

1.0<br />

0.1<br />

9.5 Hz damped wheel hop<br />

0.94 Hz damped primary ride<br />

0.01<br />

0.0<br />

Fig. 4.62<br />

10.0 20.0 30.0<br />

Frequency (Hz)<br />

Quarter vehicle body vertical acceleration time history<br />

40.0 50.0<br />

that the signal repeats itself after the end of the observation buffer is clearly<br />

in error; therefore the magnitude results of this exercise should not be used<br />

further.<br />

From Figure 4.62 it can be seen that the damped natural frequency of the<br />

body occurs at around 0.94 Hz and that the natural frequency of the<br />

unsprung mass is about 9.5 Hz. Comparing these values with the previous<br />

values, it can be seen they are systematically low. This is to be expected<br />

since the addition of a damping ratio reduces the damped natural<br />

frequency d when compared with the undamped natural frequency n :<br />

<br />

d n<br />

1 <br />

(4.87)<br />

The greatest reduction in frequency comes with the heavily damped wheel<br />

hop mode. Observing the change between undamped and damped frequency<br />

allows an estimate of the damping ratio to be made. For the two<br />

modes the damping ratios can be estimated as 0.07 and 0.48 for primary<br />

ride and wheel hop, respectively. The damping of the primary ride is low.<br />

However, if the exercise were to be repeated at different amplitudes of excitation,<br />

the level of damping in the primary ride is certain to vary since the<br />

damper characteristics are highly non-linear. For this reason, the timedomain<br />

method and subsequent processing are the preferred methods for<br />

evaluating ride behaviour once simplified undamped positioning calculations<br />

have been carried out.<br />

The next question has to be ‘how does one choose where to position primary<br />

ride behaviour?’ In order to answer this, some knowledge of typical<br />

road surfaces is required. Road surfaces are, to a first approximation, a<br />

random process passing under the car. They can be described by the<br />

expression<br />

V R 1<br />

K( 2<br />

)<br />

u( )<br />

<br />

R<br />

<br />

2<br />

(4.88)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!