4569846498
Modelling and analysis of suspension systems 179 2.0 1.0 Steer angle (deg) 0.0 1.0 2.0 Rigid joints Linear bushes __ __ __ __ Non-linear bushes Test data 3.0 80.0 40.0 0.0 40.0 100.0 60.0 20.0 20.0 Bump movement (mm) 60.0 80.0 120.0 100.0 Fig. 4.40 Front suspension – steer angle with bump movement 260.0 Roll centre height (mm) 240.0 220.0 200.0 180.0 160.0 Rigid joints Linear bushes Non-linear bushes 140.0 120.0 80.0 40.0 0.0 40.0 100.0 60.0 20.0 20.0 Bump movement (mm) 60.0 80.0 120.0 100.0 Fig. 4.41 Front suspension – roll centre height with bump movement. (This material has been reproduced from the Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, K2 Vol. 213 ‘The modelling and simulation of vehicle handling. Part 2: vehicle modelling’, M.V. Blundell, page 125, by permission of the Council of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers) Considering the merits of each modelling approach it appears from the curves plotted that for the range of vertical movement expected of a handling model there is little difference between models using rigid joints, linear bushes or non-linear bushes. The use of the non-linear model will significantly increase the effort required to model the vehicle. This is evident from Table 4.4 which compares the data inputs required to model the connection of the front suspension lower arm to the vehicle body.
180 Multibody Systems Approach to Vehicle Dynamics 30.0 20.0 Track change (mm) 10.0 0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 Rigid joints Linear bushes Non-linear bushes 40.0 80.0 40.0 0.0 40.0 100.0 60.0 20.0 20.0 Bump movement (mm) 60.0 80.0 120.0 100.0 Fig. 4.42 Front suspension – half track change with bump movement 7000.0 6000.0 Vertical force (N) 5000.0 4000.0 3000.0 2000.0 1000.0 Rigid joints Linear bushes Non-linear bushes Test data Fig. 4.43 0.0 50.0 30.0 10.0 10.0 30.0 60.0 40.0 20.0 0.0 20.0 Bump movement (mm) 40.0 Front suspension – vertical force with bump movement 50.0 60.0 4.8 Durability studies (component loading) 4.8.1 Overview Multibody systems programs can often be used to determine the loads acting on suspension components and the body pickup points as inputs to finite element models of the components or vehicle structure. These simulations are aimed to match the series of tests that a vehicle manufacturer would perform on the proving ground to test the durability of the vehicle and chassis components. Different manufacturers will implement their own
- Page 152 and 153: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 154 and 155: 4 Modelling and analysis of suspens
- Page 156 and 157: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 158 and 159: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 160 and 161: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 162 and 163: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 164 and 165: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 166 and 167: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 168 and 169: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 170 and 171: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 172 and 173: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 174 and 175: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 176 and 177: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 178 and 179: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 180 and 181: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 182 and 183: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 184 and 185: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 186 and 187: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 188 and 189: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 190 and 191: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 192 and 193: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 194 and 195: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 196 and 197: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 198 and 199: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 200 and 201: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 204 and 205: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 206 and 207: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 208 and 209: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 210 and 211: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 212 and 213: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 214 and 215: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 216 and 217: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 218 and 219: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 220 and 221: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 222 and 223: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 224 and 225: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 226 and 227: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 228 and 229: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 230 and 231: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 232 and 233: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 234 and 235: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 236 and 237: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 238 and 239: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 240 and 241: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 242 and 243: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 244 and 245: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 246 and 247: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 248 and 249: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 250 and 251: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
180 Multibody Systems Approach to Vehicle Dynamics<br />
30.0<br />
20.0<br />
Track change (mm)<br />
10.0<br />
0.0<br />
10.0<br />
20.0<br />
30.0<br />
Rigid joints<br />
Linear bushes<br />
Non-linear bushes<br />
40.0<br />
80.0 40.0 0.0 40.0<br />
100.0 60.0 20.0 20.0<br />
Bump movement (mm)<br />
60.0<br />
80.0<br />
120.0<br />
100.0<br />
Fig. 4.42<br />
Front suspension – half track change with bump movement<br />
7000.0<br />
6000.0<br />
Vertical force (N)<br />
5000.0<br />
4000.0<br />
3000.0<br />
2000.0<br />
1000.0<br />
Rigid joints<br />
Linear bushes<br />
Non-linear bushes<br />
Test data<br />
Fig. 4.43<br />
0.0<br />
50.0 30.0 10.0 10.0 30.0<br />
60.0 40.0 20.0 0.0 20.0<br />
Bump movement (mm)<br />
40.0<br />
Front suspension – vertical force with bump movement<br />
50.0<br />
60.0<br />
4.8 Durability studies (component loading)<br />
4.8.1 Overview<br />
Multibody systems programs can often be used to determine the loads acting<br />
on suspension components and the body pickup points as inputs to<br />
finite element models of the components or vehicle structure. These simulations<br />
are aimed to match the series of tests that a vehicle manufacturer<br />
would perform on the proving ground to test the durability of the vehicle<br />
and chassis components. Different manufacturers will implement their own