4569846498
Modelling and analysis of suspension systems 163 Using the instant axes method the left and right steer axes can be computed from the suspension’s compliance matrix. The process involves locking the spring to prevent wheel rise and applying an incremental steering torque or force. The resulting translation and rotation of the wheel carrier parts can then be used to compute the instant axis, and hence steer axis of rotation for each wheel carrier. Note that the formulations of suspension output that follow are for a quarter vehicle suspension model located on the right side of the vehicle using the general vehicle co-ordinate system in this text with the x-axis pointing to the rear, the y-axis to the side and the z-axis upwards. Needless to say users must ensure the formulations are consistent with the vehicle co-ordinate system and the side of the vehicle being considered to ensure the correct sign for the calculated outputs. For each of the suspension characteristics discussed a typical system variable calculation is provided. This will assist users of MBS programs who need to develop their own calculations without access to the automated outputs in a program such as ADAMS/Car. 4.5.3 Bump movement, wheel recession and half track change As stated earlier it can be the practice to impart vertical motion to a suspension system at either the wheel centre or wheel base. In the following example the displacements at the wheel centre are used to determine the suspension movement. The displacements at the wheel base would be corrected for camber, steer and castor angle changes and dependent on the suspension geometry. On the real vehicle the displacements of the tyre contact patch relative to the road wheel would also result due to the effects of tyre distortion. This is discussed later in Chapter 5. Bump movement (BM) is the independent variable and is taken as positive as the wheel moves upwards in the positive z direction relative to the vehicle body. Similarly wheel recession (WR) and half track change (HTC) are taken as positive as the wheel moves back and outwards in the positive x and y directions respectively. The displacements are obtained simply by comparing the movement of a marker at the wheel centre (WC) relative to an initially coincident fixed marker on the ground (FG). The displacements are shown in Figure 4.24 where the MSC.ADAMS system variable format is used to describe the outputs. 4.5.4 Camber and steer angle Camber angle, , is defined as the angle measured in the front elevation between the wheel plane and the vertical. Camber angle is measured in degrees and taken as positive if the top of the wheel leans outwards relative to the vehicle body as shown in Figure 4.25. The steer or toe angle, , is defined as the angle measured in the top elevation between the longitudinal axis of the vehicle and the line of intersection of the wheel plane and road surface. Steer angle is taken here as positive if the front of the wheel toes towards the vehicle. Both camber and steer angle can be calculated using two markers located on the wheel spindle axis. In this case a marker is used at the wheel centre
164 Multibody Systems Approach to Vehicle Dynamics Wheel centre marker (WC) BM HTC Fixed ground marker (FG) Y Z BM DZ(WC,FG) HTC DY(WC,FG) WR DX(WC,FG) WC FG Z WR X Fig. 4.24 Bump movement, wheel recession and half track change γ SA γ WC Z Y γ (180/π) ATAN(DZ(WC,SA)/DY(SA,WC)) X Y WC δ δ (180/π) ATAN(DX(WC,SA)/DY(SA,WC)) δ SA Fig. 4.25 Calculation of camber angle and steer angle
- Page 136 and 137: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 138 and 139: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 140 and 141: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 142 and 143: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 144 and 145: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 146 and 147: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 148 and 149: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 150 and 151: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 152 and 153: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 154 and 155: 4 Modelling and analysis of suspens
- Page 156 and 157: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 158 and 159: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 160 and 161: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 162 and 163: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 164 and 165: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 166 and 167: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 168 and 169: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 170 and 171: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 172 and 173: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 174 and 175: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 176 and 177: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 178 and 179: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 180 and 181: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 182 and 183: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 184 and 185: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 188 and 189: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 190 and 191: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 192 and 193: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 194 and 195: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 196 and 197: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 198 and 199: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 200 and 201: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 202 and 203: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 204 and 205: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 206 and 207: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 208 and 209: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 210 and 211: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 212 and 213: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 214 and 215: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 216 and 217: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 218 and 219: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 220 and 221: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 222 and 223: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 224 and 225: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 226 and 227: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 228 and 229: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 230 and 231: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 232 and 233: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 234 and 235: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
Modelling and analysis of suspension systems 163<br />
Using the instant axes method the left and right steer axes can be computed<br />
from the suspension’s compliance matrix. The process involves locking the<br />
spring to prevent wheel rise and applying an incremental steering torque or<br />
force. The resulting translation and rotation of the wheel carrier parts can<br />
then be used to compute the instant axis, and hence steer axis of rotation for<br />
each wheel carrier.<br />
Note that the formulations of suspension output that follow are for a quarter<br />
vehicle suspension model located on the right side of the vehicle using<br />
the general vehicle co-ordinate system in this text with the x-axis pointing<br />
to the rear, the y-axis to the side and the z-axis upwards. Needless to<br />
say users must ensure the formulations are consistent with the vehicle<br />
co-ordinate system and the side of the vehicle being considered to ensure the<br />
correct sign for the calculated outputs. For each of the suspension characteristics<br />
discussed a typical system variable calculation is provided. This will assist<br />
users of MBS programs who need to develop their own calculations without<br />
access to the automated outputs in a program such as ADAMS/Car.<br />
4.5.3 Bump movement, wheel recession and half track change<br />
As stated earlier it can be the practice to impart vertical motion to a suspension<br />
system at either the wheel centre or wheel base. In the following<br />
example the displacements at the wheel centre are used to determine the<br />
suspension movement. The displacements at the wheel base would be corrected<br />
for camber, steer and castor angle changes and dependent on the suspension<br />
geometry. On the real vehicle the displacements of the tyre contact<br />
patch relative to the road wheel would also result due to the effects of tyre<br />
distortion. This is discussed later in Chapter 5.<br />
Bump movement (BM) is the independent variable and is taken as positive<br />
as the wheel moves upwards in the positive z direction relative to the<br />
vehicle body. Similarly wheel recession (WR) and half track change (HTC)<br />
are taken as positive as the wheel moves back and outwards in the positive<br />
x and y directions respectively.<br />
The displacements are obtained simply by comparing the movement of a<br />
marker at the wheel centre (WC) relative to an initially coincident fixed marker<br />
on the ground (FG). The displacements are shown in Figure 4.24 where the<br />
MSC.ADAMS system variable format is used to describe the outputs.<br />
4.5.4 Camber and steer angle<br />
Camber angle, , is defined as the angle measured in the front elevation<br />
between the wheel plane and the vertical. Camber angle is measured in<br />
degrees and taken as positive if the top of the wheel leans outwards relative<br />
to the vehicle body as shown in Figure 4.25.<br />
The steer or toe angle, , is defined as the angle measured in the top elevation<br />
between the longitudinal axis of the vehicle and the line of intersection<br />
of the wheel plane and road surface. Steer angle is taken here as positive if<br />
the front of the wheel toes towards the vehicle.<br />
Both camber and steer angle can be calculated using two markers located<br />
on the wheel spindle axis. In this case a marker is used at the wheel centre