4569846498
Modelling and analysis of suspension systems 145 Fig. 4.10 The combination of anti-roll geometry to give a single ‘roll centre’ between left and right wheels is clearly nonsensical when the loading is strongly asymmetric – even when the asymmetry is less extreme than the racing Ford Falcon shown here. vehicle and mitigates sudden, aggressive steer inputs. Vehicles that do not have this type of geometry, notably those with trailing arm rear suspensions, are unable to benefit from these effects. For both longitudinal and lateral load transfers there is no conceptual reason why either the anti-pitch angle or anti-roll angle may not be negative. Motorcycles, for example, have a negative anti-pitch angle equal to the steer axis rake when they are fitted with conventional telescopic forks. This has the disadvantage of requiring extra performance from the suspension springs since they must carry more than the straightforward load transfer one might instinctively expect. Some practitioners attempt to calculate combined measures for both suspensions on the same axle or indeed all the suspensions on the vehicle. For beam axles there is some logic in combining the characteristics since the wheels are physically joined but for independent suspensions, calculating some combined metric is of questionable value. For example, attempting to combine anti-roll angles across one axle in a purely geometric manner, when their relative importance is determined by wheel loading, is clearly nonsensical, as shown in Figure 4.10. Multibody systems analysis allows both an understanding of the load transfers in a rig-based environment, such as may be measured on the MIRA Kinematics & Compliance rig (Whitehead, 1995) and also during real driving manoeuvres. In both situations, the ability of an MBS model to retrieve forces in each suspension member in convenient frames of reference while working with quarter, half or full vehicle models is a powerful tool to unscramble some of these less-than-intuitive effects with vehicle designs.
146 Multibody Systems Approach to Vehicle Dynamics 4.1.4 Compliant wheel plane control Hand-in-glove with an understanding of the load transmission paths and time delays associated with the activity manoeuvring the vehicle in the ground plane comes an understanding of the resulting motion of the wheel plane with respect to the ground. From the treatment of tyres that follows in Chapter 5, and as described briefly in the introductory chapter, it is clear that the angles at which the tyres are presented to the road are of crucial importance in modifying the forces generated by the tyres and hence the resulting motion of the vehicle. There are some subtle and intricate effects present in real vehicle systems that defy simplistic comprehension and evaluation. For example, the deformation of anti-roll bars reorients the links with which they are connected to the moving suspension members and may introduce forces that ‘steer’ the wheel plane with respect to the vehicle. This may not have been considered at the time the suspension was schemed conceptually but yet may modify the behaviour of the vehicle in practice. Multibody systems analysis allows the reconstruction of rig-based measurements for such wheel plane compliant behaviour before prototype vehicles exist. It also allows a systematic and well-controlled comparison of behaviour with different levels of compliance in order to establish the influences of the different aspects of wheel plane compliance on vehicle behaviour. Typically such studies carry across several revisions of a model within a market segment and are thus of some strategic benefit. 4.1.5 Kinematic wheel plane control Suspension arrangements typically consist of some connection of linkages to a device for holding the bearings in which the wheel actually turns. The interaction of those individual elements comprising the linkage means that the wheel plane typically undergoes some sort of translation and rotation as the suspension articulates. This motion of the wheel plane is traditionally defined with respect to the vehicle body, although for a moving vehicle it is the angles and velocities with respect to the road that are of import. However, using the vehicle body gives a convenient frame of reference and so the following descriptions will do so: (i) Toe change (steer) with suspension articulation gives a lateral force and yaw moment by directly adding to or subtracting from the tyre slip angle and is readily understood. Some care is needed when discussing this characteristic since there are a number of possibilities for definition; steer may be defined as a right-hand positive rotation about the vehicle vertical axis or it may be defined as a handed rotation, different on left and right sides of the vehicle (‘toe-out’) or even as a term relating the behaviour to the yaw moment it induces on the vehicle (‘roll understeer’). (ii) Camber change acts to mitigate the angle with which the tyre is presented to the road due to the roll of the body with respect to road surface. For typical passenger vehicles, the vehicles roll ‘out’ of turns, with the inside edge of the vehicle platform being further away from the road than
- Page 118 and 119: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 120 and 121: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 122 and 123: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 124 and 125: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 126 and 127: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 128 and 129: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 130 and 131: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 132 and 133: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 134 and 135: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 136 and 137: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 138 and 139: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 140 and 141: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 142 and 143: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 144 and 145: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 146 and 147: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 148 and 149: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 150 and 151: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 152 and 153: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 154 and 155: 4 Modelling and analysis of suspens
- Page 156 and 157: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 158 and 159: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 160 and 161: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 162 and 163: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 164 and 165: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 166 and 167: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 170 and 171: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 172 and 173: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 174 and 175: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 176 and 177: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 178 and 179: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 180 and 181: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 182 and 183: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 184 and 185: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 186 and 187: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 188 and 189: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 190 and 191: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 192 and 193: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 194 and 195: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 196 and 197: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 198 and 199: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 200 and 201: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 202 and 203: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 204 and 205: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 206 and 207: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 208 and 209: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 210 and 211: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 212 and 213: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 214 and 215: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 216 and 217: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
146 Multibody Systems Approach to Vehicle Dynamics<br />
4.1.4 Compliant wheel plane control<br />
Hand-in-glove with an understanding of the load transmission paths and<br />
time delays associated with the activity manoeuvring the vehicle in the<br />
ground plane comes an understanding of the resulting motion of the wheel<br />
plane with respect to the ground. From the treatment of tyres that follows<br />
in Chapter 5, and as described briefly in the introductory chapter, it is clear<br />
that the angles at which the tyres are presented to the road are of crucial<br />
importance in modifying the forces generated by the tyres and hence the<br />
resulting motion of the vehicle.<br />
There are some subtle and intricate effects present in real vehicle systems<br />
that defy simplistic comprehension and evaluation. For example, the deformation<br />
of anti-roll bars reorients the links with which they are connected to<br />
the moving suspension members and may introduce forces that ‘steer’ the<br />
wheel plane with respect to the vehicle. This may not have been considered<br />
at the time the suspension was schemed conceptually but yet may modify<br />
the behaviour of the vehicle in practice.<br />
Multibody systems analysis allows the reconstruction of rig-based measurements<br />
for such wheel plane compliant behaviour before prototype<br />
vehicles exist. It also allows a systematic and well-controlled comparison<br />
of behaviour with different levels of compliance in order to establish the<br />
influences of the different aspects of wheel plane compliance on vehicle<br />
behaviour. Typically such studies carry across several revisions of a model<br />
within a market segment and are thus of some strategic benefit.<br />
4.1.5 Kinematic wheel plane control<br />
Suspension arrangements typically consist of some connection of linkages<br />
to a device for holding the bearings in which the wheel actually turns. The<br />
interaction of those individual elements comprising the linkage means that<br />
the wheel plane typically undergoes some sort of translation and rotation as<br />
the suspension articulates.<br />
This motion of the wheel plane is traditionally defined with respect to the<br />
vehicle body, although for a moving vehicle it is the angles and velocities<br />
with respect to the road that are of import. However, using the vehicle body<br />
gives a convenient frame of reference and so the following descriptions<br />
will do so:<br />
(i) Toe change (steer) with suspension articulation gives a lateral force and<br />
yaw moment by directly adding to or subtracting from the tyre slip angle<br />
and is readily understood. Some care is needed when discussing this characteristic<br />
since there are a number of possibilities for definition; steer may<br />
be defined as a right-hand positive rotation about the vehicle vertical axis<br />
or it may be defined as a handed rotation, different on left and right sides of<br />
the vehicle (‘toe-out’) or even as a term relating the behaviour to the yaw<br />
moment it induces on the vehicle (‘roll understeer’).<br />
(ii) Camber change acts to mitigate the angle with which the tyre is presented<br />
to the road due to the roll of the body with respect to road surface.<br />
For typical passenger vehicles, the vehicles roll ‘out’ of turns, with the<br />
inside edge of the vehicle platform being further away from the road than