4569846498
Multibody systems simulation software 111 example, building a sensor into the model to stop the simulation should this be about to occur allowing the analyst to investigate the problem further. The various elastic bushes or mounts used throughout a suspension system to isolate vibration may be represented initially by six linear uncoupled equations based on stiffness and damping. As with a joint a bush connects two parts using an I marker on one body and a J marker on another body. These markers are normally taken to be coincident when setting up the model but it will be seen from the formulation presented here that any initial offset, either translational or rotational, would result in an initial preforce or torque in the bush. This would be in addition to any initial value for these that the user may care to define. The general form of the equation for the forces and torques generated in the bush is given in (3.47): {F ij } j [k]{d ij } j [c]{v ij } j {f ij } j (3.47) where {F ij } j is a column matrix containing the components of the force and torque acting on the I marker from the J marker [k] is a square stiffness matrix where all off diagonal terms are zero {d ij } j is a column matrix containing the components of the displacement and rotation of the I marker relative to the J marker [c] is a square damping matrix where all off diagonal terms are zero {v ij } j is a column matrix of time derivatives of the terms in the {d ij } matrix {f ij } j is a column matrix containing the components of the preforce and pretorque applied to the I marker Expanding equation (3.47) leads to the following set of uncoupled equations presented in matrix form as ⎡Fx ⎤ ⎡kx 0 0 0 0 0 ⎤ ⎡dx ⎤ ⎡cx 0 0 0 0 0 ⎤ ⎡ vx ⎤ ⎢ F ⎥ ⎢ y 0 ky 0 0 0 0 ⎥ ⎢ d ⎥ ⎢ ⎢ ⎥ y 0 c ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ y 0 0 0 0 v ⎥ ⎢ y ⎥ ⎢Fz ⎥ ⎢ 0 0 kz 0 0 0 ⎥ ⎢dz ⎥ ⎢ 0 0 cz 0 0 0 ⎥ ⎢ vz ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ Tx ⎥ ⎢ 0 0 0 ktx 0 0 ⎥ ⎢ rx ⎥ ⎢ 0 0 0 ctx 0 0 ⎥ ⎢ x ⎥ ⎢T ⎥ ⎢ y 0 0 0 0 k ⎥ ty 0 ⎢ r ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ y 0 0 0 0 c ⎥ ty 0 y ⎣⎢ Tz ⎦⎥ ⎣⎢ 0 0 0 0 0 ktz ⎦⎥ ⎢⎣ rz ⎦⎥ ⎣⎢ 0 0 0 0 0 ctz ⎦⎥ ⎣⎢ z ⎦⎥ ⎡ fx ⎤ ⎢ f ⎥ ⎢ y ⎥ ⎢ fz ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ tx ⎥ ⎢t ⎥ y ⎣⎢ tz ⎦⎥ (3.48) It should be noted that all the terms in (3.47) and (3.48) are referenced to the J marker reference frame and that the equilibriating force and torque acting on the J marker is determined from {F ji } j {F ij } j (3.49) {T ji } j {T ij } j {d ij } j {F ij } j (3.50) The shape and construction of the bush will dictate the manner in which the I marker and J marker are set up and orientated. This is illustrated in Figure 3.34 where it can be seen that for the cylindrical bush where there are no voids the radial stiffness is constant circumferentially. For this bush it is only necessary to ensure the z-axes of the I and J markers are aligned with
112 Mutibody Systems Approach to Vehicle Dynamics Bush without voids X XP Bush with voids Y ZP Y ZP Fig. 3.34 Orientation of bush axis system the axis of the bush. For the bush with voids the radial stiffness will require definition in both the x and y directions as shown. An example of the command used to define a massless bush with linear stiffness and damping properties is: BUSH/03,I0203,J0503, ,K7825,7825,944,KT2.5E6,2.5E6,944 ,C35,35,480,CT61E3,61E3,40 It is also possible to extend the definition of bushes from linear to non-linear. Examples of this will be given in the next chapter. The most advanced examples of the modelling of force elements extend to the incorporation of finite element type representations of beams and flexible bodies into the multibody systems model. In modelling a vehicle the most likely use of a beam type element is going to be in modelling the roll bars or possibly if considered relevant an appropriate suspension member such as a tie rod. The beam element in MSC.ADAMS requires the definition of an I marker on one body and a J marker on another body to represent the ends of the beam with length L as shown in Figure 3.35. The beam element transmits forces and moments between the two markers, has a constant cross-section and obeys Timoshenko beam theory. The beam centroidal axis is defined by the x-axis of the J marker and when the beam is in an undeflected state, the I marker lies on the x-axis of the J marker and has the same orientation. The forces and moments shown in Figure 3.35 are: Axial forces F Ix and F Jx Shear forces F Iy , F Iz , F Jy and F Jz Twisting moments M Ix and M Jx Bending moments M Iy , M Iz , M Iy and M Jz
- Page 84 and 85: Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bo
- Page 86 and 87: Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bo
- Page 88 and 89: Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bo
- Page 90 and 91: Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bo
- Page 92 and 93: Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bo
- Page 94 and 95: Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bo
- Page 96 and 97: Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bo
- Page 98 and 99: 3 Multibody systems simulation soft
- Page 100 and 101: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 102 and 103: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 104 and 105: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 106 and 107: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 108 and 109: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 110 and 111: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 112 and 113: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 114 and 115: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 116 and 117: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 118 and 119: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 120 and 121: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 122 and 123: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 124 and 125: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 126 and 127: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 128 and 129: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 130 and 131: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 132 and 133: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 136 and 137: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 138 and 139: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 140 and 141: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 142 and 143: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 144 and 145: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 146 and 147: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 148 and 149: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 150 and 151: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 152 and 153: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 154 and 155: 4 Modelling and analysis of suspens
- Page 156 and 157: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 158 and 159: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 160 and 161: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 162 and 163: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 164 and 165: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 166 and 167: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 168 and 169: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 170 and 171: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 172 and 173: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 174 and 175: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 176 and 177: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 178 and 179: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 180 and 181: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 182 and 183: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
Multibody systems simulation software 111<br />
example, building a sensor into the model to stop the simulation should this<br />
be about to occur allowing the analyst to investigate the problem further.<br />
The various elastic bushes or mounts used throughout a suspension system to<br />
isolate vibration may be represented initially by six linear uncoupled equations<br />
based on stiffness and damping. As with a joint a bush connects two<br />
parts using an I marker on one body and a J marker on another body. These<br />
markers are normally taken to be coincident when setting up the model but<br />
it will be seen from the formulation presented here that any initial offset,<br />
either translational or rotational, would result in an initial preforce or torque<br />
in the bush. This would be in addition to any initial value for these that the<br />
user may care to define.<br />
The general form of the equation for the forces and torques generated in the<br />
bush is given in (3.47):<br />
{F ij } j [k]{d ij } j [c]{v ij } j {f ij } j (3.47)<br />
where<br />
{F ij } j is a column matrix containing the components of the force and torque<br />
acting on the I marker from the J marker<br />
[k] is a square stiffness matrix where all off diagonal terms are zero<br />
{d ij } j is a column matrix containing the components of the displacement<br />
and rotation of the I marker relative to the J marker<br />
[c] is a square damping matrix where all off diagonal terms are zero<br />
{v ij } j is a column matrix of time derivatives of the terms in the {d ij } matrix<br />
{f ij } j is a column matrix containing the components of the preforce and<br />
pretorque applied to the I marker<br />
Expanding equation (3.47) leads to the following set of uncoupled equations<br />
presented in matrix form as<br />
⎡Fx<br />
⎤ ⎡kx<br />
0 0 0 0 0 ⎤ ⎡dx<br />
⎤ ⎡cx<br />
0 0 0 0 0 ⎤ ⎡ vx<br />
⎤<br />
⎢<br />
F<br />
⎥ ⎢<br />
y 0 ky<br />
0 0 0 0<br />
⎥ ⎢<br />
d<br />
⎥ ⎢<br />
⎢ ⎥<br />
y 0 c<br />
⎥ ⎢ ⎥<br />
⎢<br />
⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢<br />
y 0 0 0 0 v<br />
⎥ ⎢<br />
y<br />
⎥<br />
⎢Fz<br />
⎥ ⎢ 0 0 kz<br />
0 0 0 ⎥ ⎢dz<br />
⎥ ⎢ 0 0 cz<br />
0 0 0 ⎥ ⎢ vz<br />
⎥<br />
⎢ ⎥⎢<br />
⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢<br />
⎥ ⎢ ⎥ <br />
⎢<br />
Tx<br />
⎥ ⎢<br />
0 0 0 ktx<br />
0 0<br />
⎥ ⎢<br />
rx<br />
⎥ ⎢<br />
0 0 0 ctx<br />
0 0<br />
⎥ ⎢<br />
x ⎥<br />
⎢T<br />
⎥ ⎢<br />
y 0 0 0 0 k ⎥<br />
ty 0 ⎢ r ⎥ ⎢<br />
⎥ ⎢<br />
y 0 0 0 0 c ⎥<br />
ty 0 y<br />
⎣⎢<br />
Tz<br />
⎦⎥<br />
⎣⎢<br />
0 0 0 0 0 ktz<br />
⎦⎥<br />
⎢⎣<br />
rz<br />
⎦⎥<br />
⎣⎢<br />
0 0 0 0 0 ctz<br />
⎦⎥<br />
⎣⎢<br />
z ⎦⎥<br />
⎡ fx<br />
⎤<br />
⎢<br />
f<br />
⎥<br />
⎢<br />
y<br />
⎥<br />
⎢ fz<br />
⎥<br />
⎢ ⎥<br />
⎢<br />
tx<br />
⎥<br />
⎢t<br />
⎥<br />
y<br />
⎣⎢<br />
tz<br />
⎦⎥<br />
(3.48)<br />
It should be noted that all the terms in (3.47) and (3.48) are referenced to<br />
the J marker reference frame and that the equilibriating force and torque<br />
acting on the J marker is determined from<br />
{F ji } j {F ij } j (3.49)<br />
{T ji } j {T ij } j {d ij } j {F ij } j (3.50)<br />
The shape and construction of the bush will dictate the manner in which<br />
the I marker and J marker are set up and orientated. This is illustrated in<br />
Figure 3.34 where it can be seen that for the cylindrical bush where there are<br />
no voids the radial stiffness is constant circumferentially. For this bush it is<br />
only necessary to ensure the z-axes of the I and J markers are aligned with