4569846498
Multibody systems simulation software 93 {a J } 1 J {d IJ } 1 I Fig. 3.14 Inplane constraint element. (This material has been reproduced from the Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, K2 Vol. 213 ‘The modelling and simulation of vehicle handling. Part 1: analysis methods’, M.V. Blundell, page 114, by permission of the Council of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers) force corresponding to this constraint can be represented by a scalar term d . The reaction force on part i can be represented by the vector {a J } 1 d with a moment given by {r I } 1 {a J } 1 d . Applying Newton’s third law again the reaction force on part j can be represented by the vector {a J } 1 d . The moment contribution to part j is given by ({r J } 1 {d IJ } 1 ) {a J } 1 d . Expanding this again using the definition given for {d IJ } 1 in equation (3.38) gives ({R i } 1 {r I } 1 {R j } 1 ) {a J } 1 d . In order to complete the calculation the contribution to the term {Mn C } e in equation (3.36) a transformation of the moments into the co-ordinates of the part Euler-axis frame is needed. For part i this would be achieved using [B i ] T {r I } i [A ij ]{a J } 1 d . For part j this would be achieved using [B j ] T {a J } j [A j1 ]({R i } 1 [A 1i ]{r I } i {R j } 1 ) d . The third basic constraint element constrains a unit vector fixed in one part to remain perpendicular to a unit vector located in another part and is known as the perpendicular constraint. The constraint shown in Figure 3.15 is defined using a unit vector {a J } 1 located at the J marker in part j and a unit vector {a I } 1 located at the I marker belonging to part i. The vector dot (scalar) product is used to enforce perpendicularity as shown in equation (3.41): p {a I } 1 • {a J } 1 0 (3.41) The constraint can be considered to be enforced by equal and opposite moments acting on part i and part j. The constraint does not contribute any forces to the part equations but does include the scalar term p in the formulation of the moments. The moment acting on part i is given by {a I } 1 {a J } 1 p Applying Newton’s third law the moment acting on part j is given by {a I } 1 {a J } 1 p . The moments must be transformed into the co-ordinates of the part Euler-axis frame.
94 Mutibody Systems Approach to Vehicle Dynamics {a J } 1 J Part i {a I } 1 I Part j Fig. 3.15 Perpendicular constraint element. (This material has been reproduced from the Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, K2 Vol. 213 ‘The modelling and simulation of vehicle handling. Part 1: analysis methods’, M.V. Blundell, page 115, by permission of the Council of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers) {z J }1 J {x J } 1 Part j {z i } 1 {x i } 1 I {y J } 1 No relative rotation about this axis Part i {y i } 1 Fig. 3.16 Angular constraint element. (This material has been reproduced from the Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, K2 Vol. 213 ‘The modelling and simulation of vehicle handling. Part 1: analysis methods’, M.V. Blundell, page 115, by permission of the Council of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers) For part i this would be achieved using [B i ] T {a I } i [A ij ]{a J } j p . For part j this would be achieved using [B j ] T {a J } j [A ji ]{a I } i p . The fourth and final basic constraint element is the angular constraint which prevents the relative rotation of two parts about a common axis. The constraint equation is: arctan ({x i } 1 • {y j } 1 /{x i } 1 • {x j } 1 ) 0 (3.42)
- Page 66 and 67: Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bo
- Page 68 and 69: Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bo
- Page 70 and 71: Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bo
- Page 72 and 73: Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bo
- Page 74 and 75: Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bo
- Page 76 and 77: Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bo
- Page 78 and 79: Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bo
- Page 80 and 81: Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bo
- Page 82 and 83: Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bo
- Page 84 and 85: Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bo
- Page 86 and 87: Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bo
- Page 88 and 89: Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bo
- Page 90 and 91: Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bo
- Page 92 and 93: Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bo
- Page 94 and 95: Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bo
- Page 96 and 97: Kinematics and dynamics of rigid bo
- Page 98 and 99: 3 Multibody systems simulation soft
- Page 100 and 101: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 102 and 103: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 104 and 105: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 106 and 107: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 108 and 109: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 110 and 111: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 112 and 113: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 114 and 115: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 118 and 119: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 120 and 121: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 122 and 123: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 124 and 125: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 126 and 127: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 128 and 129: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 130 and 131: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 132 and 133: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 134 and 135: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 136 and 137: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 138 and 139: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 140 and 141: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 142 and 143: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 144 and 145: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 146 and 147: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 148 and 149: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 150 and 151: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 152 and 153: Multibody systems simulation softwa
- Page 154 and 155: 4 Modelling and analysis of suspens
- Page 156 and 157: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 158 and 159: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 160 and 161: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 162 and 163: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
- Page 164 and 165: Modelling and analysis of suspensio
94 Mutibody Systems Approach to Vehicle Dynamics<br />
{a J } 1<br />
J<br />
Part i<br />
{a I } 1<br />
I<br />
Part j<br />
Fig. 3.15 Perpendicular constraint element. (This material has been reproduced<br />
from the Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, K2 Vol. 213<br />
‘The modelling and simulation of vehicle handling. Part 1: analysis methods’,<br />
M.V. Blundell, page 115, by permission of the Council of the Institution of<br />
Mechanical Engineers)<br />
{z J }1<br />
J<br />
{x J } 1<br />
Part j<br />
{z i } 1<br />
{x i } 1<br />
I<br />
{y J } 1<br />
No relative rotation<br />
about this axis<br />
Part i<br />
{y i } 1<br />
Fig. 3.16 Angular constraint element. (This material has been reproduced<br />
from the Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, K2 Vol. 213<br />
‘The modelling and simulation of vehicle handling. Part 1: analysis methods’,<br />
M.V. Blundell, page 115, by permission of the Council of the Institution of<br />
Mechanical Engineers)<br />
For part i this would be achieved using [B i ] T {a I } i [A ij ]{a J } j p .<br />
For part j this would be achieved using [B j ] T {a J } j [A ji ]{a I } i p .<br />
The fourth and final basic constraint element is the angular constraint<br />
which prevents the relative rotation of two parts about a common axis. The<br />
constraint equation is:<br />
arctan ({x i } 1 • {y j } 1 /{x i } 1 • {x j } 1 ) 0 (3.42)