01.05.2017 Views

4569846498

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

78 Mutibody Systems Approach to Vehicle Dynamics<br />

structural parts of the system may be represented in modal form to study<br />

the influence of its flexibility on the behaviour of the system as a whole.<br />

A disadvantage of this method of working is the opportunity to consume large<br />

amounts of computing resources solving these models if care is not taken to<br />

ensure the flexibility is germane to the task at hand. Where a full representation<br />

of the flexibility of the structure is unnecessary, a simpler representation<br />

is possible using joints, ‘hinges’ and an associated stiffness at keypoints in the<br />

structure. This is the authors’ preferred compromise between accuracy and<br />

computational efficiency. This level of abstraction requires a high degree of<br />

understanding of the structural behaviour of elements of the system and<br />

can easily lead to poorly conditioned numerical problems if carelessly performed,<br />

raising solution times drastically. Worse still, it can lead to ‘plausible<br />

but wrong’ answers, particularly if mass properties are poorly distributed.<br />

Using component mode synthesis, a complete set of modal components<br />

can be used with a full vehicle comprehensive model. This approach confuses<br />

accuracy with usefulness in a manner that is becoming increasingly<br />

common. The use of such models works against volatility of design, and<br />

such models cannot be effectively used with an emerging design but belong to<br />

a new generation of mathematical prototypes for use in a later vehicle program.<br />

The notion that too much complexity is a bad thing has already been<br />

discussed in Chapter 1.<br />

For full vehicle applications it is important to obtain an accurate model for<br />

the tyres and the associated forces generated at the tyre–road surface contact<br />

patch. For each tyre on the vehicle model the program will calculate the<br />

three orthogonal forces and three orthogonal torques acting at the wheel<br />

centre as a result of the conditions at the tyre–road surface contact patch. In<br />

order to perform these calculations it is necessary to continuously update<br />

the tyre model regarding the position, velocity and orientation of the wheel<br />

centre marker and any changes in the topography of the road surface. Once<br />

this information has been received the tyre model must then calculate the set<br />

of forces acting at the contact patch. Once these forces have been calculated<br />

they can be resolved back to the wheel centre. The multibody systems<br />

analysis program will then integrate through time to find the new position<br />

and orientation of the vehicle and then repeat the process.<br />

A more detailed description of the modelling features available in a typical<br />

multibody systems analysis program such as the MSC.ADAMS program<br />

follows. It should be noted that commercial software is undergoing continual<br />

development and as such the description provided here is limited to the<br />

software features required to carry out the simulations described in this text.<br />

Elements such as springs, dampers, bushes and bump stops are described in<br />

this chapter as these are considered fundamental components of an MBS<br />

modelling system.<br />

3.2 Modelling features<br />

3.2.1 Planning the model<br />

Before progressing to detail the methods used to describe the typical<br />

elements of a multibody systems model it is necessary to outline some of<br />

the planning that goes into the development of the model. The first step<br />

should be to sketch out a system schematic which would typically illustrate

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!