23.04.2017 Views

RAND_MR1382

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

specifically to the nature of the criminal enterprise. In some cases, these two roles<br />

might overlap; in others, however, they will be quite distinct.<br />

• Highlight and assess the operations of criminal networks. In effect, the analysis will<br />

examine a case study of a criminal network that penetrated a legal institution—the<br />

Bank of New York.<br />

• Outline ways in which governments and law enforcement agencies can attack<br />

networks more effectively. This requires an analysis of network vulnerabilities and<br />

how these can be exploited.<br />

Some Underlying Analytic Concepts<br />

The Network. A network can be understood very simply as a series of nodes that are<br />

connected. The nodes can be individuals, organizations, firms, or computers, so long as<br />

they are connected in significant ways. The focus here, of course, is on networks that<br />

originate and operate in order to obtain financial rewards through and from illicit<br />

activities. As such, this analysis draws on three separate strands of research: social<br />

network analysis, discussions of network business organizations, and previous work on<br />

criminal organizations (work that departs significantly from the emphasis on formal<br />

hierarchies that was long part of the dominant paradigm in the study of organized<br />

crime).<br />

Social Network Analysis. Social network analysis originated in several fields,<br />

including anthropology, sociology, and social psychology. Perhaps the most important<br />

of the early pioneers was J. L. Moreno, who, in the 1930s, developed the notion of a<br />

“sociogram.” This was<br />

a picture in which people (or more generally any social units) are represented as points in two-dimensional space,<br />

and relationships among pairs of people are represented by lines linking the corresponding points. 11<br />

The essence of this type of approach is its focus on “the relationships or ties between the<br />

nodes or units in the network.” These ties can be based on a variety of underpinning<br />

factors, such as “kinship, material transactions, flow of resources or support, behavioral<br />

interaction, group co-memberships, or the affective evaluation of one person by<br />

another.” 12 In many cases there will be some kind of exchange between the nodes,<br />

whether of commodities or services (broadly defined to include information and favors).<br />

Whatever the basis for the relationship, however, the network concept emphasizes the<br />

linkages among actors.<br />

Accordingly, social network analysis examines such issues as the importance or<br />

prominence of particular individuals in the network; the concept of centrality, i.e., the<br />

individual in the network with the most—or most important—ties to other actors; the<br />

notions of closeness and distance based on communication paths among the actors in<br />

the network; the notion of cohesive subgroups, that is, subsets of actors among whom

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!