RAND_MR1382
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
specifically to the nature of the criminal enterprise. In some cases, these two roles<br />
might overlap; in others, however, they will be quite distinct.<br />
• Highlight and assess the operations of criminal networks. In effect, the analysis will<br />
examine a case study of a criminal network that penetrated a legal institution—the<br />
Bank of New York.<br />
• Outline ways in which governments and law enforcement agencies can attack<br />
networks more effectively. This requires an analysis of network vulnerabilities and<br />
how these can be exploited.<br />
Some Underlying Analytic Concepts<br />
The Network. A network can be understood very simply as a series of nodes that are<br />
connected. The nodes can be individuals, organizations, firms, or computers, so long as<br />
they are connected in significant ways. The focus here, of course, is on networks that<br />
originate and operate in order to obtain financial rewards through and from illicit<br />
activities. As such, this analysis draws on three separate strands of research: social<br />
network analysis, discussions of network business organizations, and previous work on<br />
criminal organizations (work that departs significantly from the emphasis on formal<br />
hierarchies that was long part of the dominant paradigm in the study of organized<br />
crime).<br />
Social Network Analysis. Social network analysis originated in several fields,<br />
including anthropology, sociology, and social psychology. Perhaps the most important<br />
of the early pioneers was J. L. Moreno, who, in the 1930s, developed the notion of a<br />
“sociogram.” This was<br />
a picture in which people (or more generally any social units) are represented as points in two-dimensional space,<br />
and relationships among pairs of people are represented by lines linking the corresponding points. 11<br />
The essence of this type of approach is its focus on “the relationships or ties between the<br />
nodes or units in the network.” These ties can be based on a variety of underpinning<br />
factors, such as “kinship, material transactions, flow of resources or support, behavioral<br />
interaction, group co-memberships, or the affective evaluation of one person by<br />
another.” 12 In many cases there will be some kind of exchange between the nodes,<br />
whether of commodities or services (broadly defined to include information and favors).<br />
Whatever the basis for the relationship, however, the network concept emphasizes the<br />
linkages among actors.<br />
Accordingly, social network analysis examines such issues as the importance or<br />
prominence of particular individuals in the network; the concept of centrality, i.e., the<br />
individual in the network with the most—or most important—ties to other actors; the<br />
notions of closeness and distance based on communication paths among the actors in<br />
the network; the notion of cohesive subgroups, that is, subsets of actors among whom