23.04.2017 Views

RAND_MR1382

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

eye. Once the drive to pass the selective purchasing legislation emerged with full force,<br />

it was a surprise to those who might have opposed it, including corporations and the<br />

office of Gov. Weld, who had a reputation as a pro-business Republican. When Weld’s<br />

press secretary, Jose Juves, first heard about the legislation and checked into it—to do<br />

so, he used the web for the first time—“I was kind of shocked that the whole sort of<br />

ready-made organization … was out there.” 33 Of all the companies with business in<br />

Burma, only the oil and gas concern UNOCAL Corp. took the effort to hire a local<br />

lobbyist. For many other companies, the first time they heard about the issue was after<br />

the selective purchasing bill had become law, and they were notified that they were on<br />

an official state list of affected companies. “They definitely came late to the dance,”<br />

Juves said. 34 Table 5.1<br />

States and Localities That Have Passed Selective Purchasing Legislation on Burma<br />

Commonwealth of Massachusetts Alameda County, Calif.<br />

New York City, N.Y. Berkeley, Calif.<br />

Madison, Wisc. Santa Monica, Calif.<br />

Ann Arbor, Mich. San Francisco, Calif.<br />

Oakland, Calif. Carrboro, N.C.<br />

Takoma Park, Md. Boulder, Colo.<br />

Chapel Hill, N.C. Los Angeles, Calif.<br />

Portland, Oreg.<br />

NOTES: As of January 1999. List is meant to be suggestive; other localities also may have passed such legislation.<br />

As the bill slowly made its way through the state legislature in 1995 and 1996, activists<br />

used the Internet to push it along. Rushing, working with Simon Billenness of the<br />

Massachusetts Burma Roundtable and other activists, sent emails from home and office<br />

to keep supporters apprised of developments and to urge them to make their voices<br />

heard when the bill was at a key legislative juncture or in trouble. The electronic<br />

missives generated phone calls and letters to state senators and representatives from<br />

their constituents inside Massachusetts and activists outside the state, explaining the<br />

need for the legislation and pressing for passage.<br />

The legislation very nearly died several times. Activists using the Internet rallied to<br />

overcome each obstacle. An amendment that would have added virtually every<br />

totalitarian regime in the world to the legislation—and thus buried it under its own<br />

weight—was killed, and a March 1996 Senate motion to table the bill and postpone it to<br />

the next legislative session was reversed. Billenness, through the Burma Roundtable, was

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!