RAND_MR1382
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
eye. Once the drive to pass the selective purchasing legislation emerged with full force,<br />
it was a surprise to those who might have opposed it, including corporations and the<br />
office of Gov. Weld, who had a reputation as a pro-business Republican. When Weld’s<br />
press secretary, Jose Juves, first heard about the legislation and checked into it—to do<br />
so, he used the web for the first time—“I was kind of shocked that the whole sort of<br />
ready-made organization … was out there.” 33 Of all the companies with business in<br />
Burma, only the oil and gas concern UNOCAL Corp. took the effort to hire a local<br />
lobbyist. For many other companies, the first time they heard about the issue was after<br />
the selective purchasing bill had become law, and they were notified that they were on<br />
an official state list of affected companies. “They definitely came late to the dance,”<br />
Juves said. 34 Table 5.1<br />
States and Localities That Have Passed Selective Purchasing Legislation on Burma<br />
Commonwealth of Massachusetts Alameda County, Calif.<br />
New York City, N.Y. Berkeley, Calif.<br />
Madison, Wisc. Santa Monica, Calif.<br />
Ann Arbor, Mich. San Francisco, Calif.<br />
Oakland, Calif. Carrboro, N.C.<br />
Takoma Park, Md. Boulder, Colo.<br />
Chapel Hill, N.C. Los Angeles, Calif.<br />
Portland, Oreg.<br />
NOTES: As of January 1999. List is meant to be suggestive; other localities also may have passed such legislation.<br />
As the bill slowly made its way through the state legislature in 1995 and 1996, activists<br />
used the Internet to push it along. Rushing, working with Simon Billenness of the<br />
Massachusetts Burma Roundtable and other activists, sent emails from home and office<br />
to keep supporters apprised of developments and to urge them to make their voices<br />
heard when the bill was at a key legislative juncture or in trouble. The electronic<br />
missives generated phone calls and letters to state senators and representatives from<br />
their constituents inside Massachusetts and activists outside the state, explaining the<br />
need for the legislation and pressing for passage.<br />
The legislation very nearly died several times. Activists using the Internet rallied to<br />
overcome each obstacle. An amendment that would have added virtually every<br />
totalitarian regime in the world to the legislation—and thus buried it under its own<br />
weight—was killed, and a March 1996 Senate motion to table the bill and postpone it to<br />
the next legislative session was reversed. Billenness, through the Burma Roundtable, was