03.04.2017 Views

BRITISH COLUMBIA HYDRO AND POWER AUTHORITY

financial-information-act-return-march-31-2016

financial-information-act-return-march-31-2016

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS<br />

FOR THE YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 2016 <strong>AND</strong> 2015<br />

regular reporting of exposures.<br />

British Columbia Hydro and Power Authority<br />

The Company’s Risk Management Policy for trading activities defines various limits and controls,<br />

including Value at Risk (VaR) limits, mark-to-market limits, and various transaction specific limits<br />

which are monitored on a daily basis. VaR estimates the pre-tax forward trading loss that could result<br />

from changes in commodity prices, with a specific level of confidence, over a specific time<br />

period. Powerex uses an industry standard Monte Carlo VaR model to determine the potential change<br />

in value of its forward trading portfolio over a 10-day holding period, within a 95 per cent confidence<br />

level, resulting from normal market fluctuations.<br />

VaR as an estimate of price risk has several limitations. The VaR model uses historical information to<br />

determine potential future volatility and correlation, assuming that price movements in the recent past<br />

are indicative of near-future price movements. It cannot forecast unusual events which can lead to<br />

extreme price movements. In addition, it is sometimes difficult to appropriately estimate VaR<br />

associated with illiquid or non-standard products. As a result, Powerex uses additional measures to<br />

supplement the use of VaR to estimate price risk. These include the use of a Historic VaR<br />

methodology, stress tests and notional limits for illiquid or emerging products.<br />

Powerex’s VaR, calculated under this methodology, was approximately $10 million at March 31, 2016<br />

(2015 - $5 million).<br />

Fair Value Hierarchy<br />

The following provides an analysis of financial instruments that are measured subsequent to initial<br />

recognition at fair value, grouped based on the lowest level of input that is significant to that fair value<br />

measurement.<br />

The inputs used in determining fair value are characterized by using a hierarchy that prioritizes inputs<br />

based on the degree to which they are observable. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are as<br />

follows:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Level 1 - values are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets and liabilities.<br />

Level 2 - inputs are those other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for<br />

the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, as of the reporting date.<br />

Level 3 - inputs are those that are not based on observable market data.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!