BRITISH COLUMBIA HYDRO AND POWER AUTHORITY
financial-information-act-return-march-31-2016
financial-information-act-return-march-31-2016
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS<br />
FOR THE YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 2016 <strong>AND</strong> 2015<br />
regular reporting of exposures.<br />
British Columbia Hydro and Power Authority<br />
The Company’s Risk Management Policy for trading activities defines various limits and controls,<br />
including Value at Risk (VaR) limits, mark-to-market limits, and various transaction specific limits<br />
which are monitored on a daily basis. VaR estimates the pre-tax forward trading loss that could result<br />
from changes in commodity prices, with a specific level of confidence, over a specific time<br />
period. Powerex uses an industry standard Monte Carlo VaR model to determine the potential change<br />
in value of its forward trading portfolio over a 10-day holding period, within a 95 per cent confidence<br />
level, resulting from normal market fluctuations.<br />
VaR as an estimate of price risk has several limitations. The VaR model uses historical information to<br />
determine potential future volatility and correlation, assuming that price movements in the recent past<br />
are indicative of near-future price movements. It cannot forecast unusual events which can lead to<br />
extreme price movements. In addition, it is sometimes difficult to appropriately estimate VaR<br />
associated with illiquid or non-standard products. As a result, Powerex uses additional measures to<br />
supplement the use of VaR to estimate price risk. These include the use of a Historic VaR<br />
methodology, stress tests and notional limits for illiquid or emerging products.<br />
Powerex’s VaR, calculated under this methodology, was approximately $10 million at March 31, 2016<br />
(2015 - $5 million).<br />
Fair Value Hierarchy<br />
The following provides an analysis of financial instruments that are measured subsequent to initial<br />
recognition at fair value, grouped based on the lowest level of input that is significant to that fair value<br />
measurement.<br />
The inputs used in determining fair value are characterized by using a hierarchy that prioritizes inputs<br />
based on the degree to which they are observable. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are as<br />
follows:<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Level 1 - values are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets and liabilities.<br />
Level 2 - inputs are those other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for<br />
the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, as of the reporting date.<br />
Level 3 - inputs are those that are not based on observable market data.