12.12.2012 Views

chapter - Atmospheric and Oceanic Science

chapter - Atmospheric and Oceanic Science

chapter - Atmospheric and Oceanic Science

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Regional precipitation trends<br />

5.4. Rainfall-streamflow relationships<br />

The streamflow of the main rivers of the La Plata basin, <strong>and</strong> La Plata River<br />

itself, have strong interannual <strong>and</strong> interdecadal variability forced by the climatic<br />

variability (Robertson <strong>and</strong> Mechoso 1998; Camilloni <strong>and</strong> Barros 2000). Of particular<br />

interest for this <strong>chapter</strong>, is that trends in precipitation have given place to<br />

simultaneous trends in the river streamflows.<br />

Streamflow variability of the La Plata basin rivers is addressed in the next<br />

<strong>chapter</strong>. However, in this section it will be discussed the relationship between the<br />

variability of precipitation <strong>and</strong> river streamflows in the La Plata basin. In particular<br />

it will be discussed the increase in the sum of the streamflows in the three tributaries<br />

of the La Plata River.<br />

Table 5.1 (from Berbery <strong>and</strong> Barros 2002) shows that percent changes in precipitation<br />

over the La Plata basin, upstream of Corrientes in the Paraná River <strong>and</strong><br />

Paso de los Libres in the Uruguay River are amplified in respective changes in the<br />

streamflow. In the case studied, the sensitivity of streamflow to basin-averaged precipitation<br />

changes, expressed as elasticity (fractional change in streamflow per fractional<br />

change in precipitation) was about two, that is, for every one percent change<br />

in precipitation there was a two percent change in streamflow. Three cases (one<br />

case study <strong>and</strong> two “climatological” cases) corresponding to different time scale<br />

variability are presented in table 5.1. The first case is an example of extreme yearto-year<br />

variability of the hydrologic cycle focused in 1998 <strong>and</strong> 1999. The second<br />

case is a generalization of the first example, as it contrasts composites of El Niño<br />

Table 5.1. Basin averaged rainfall rates <strong>and</strong> river discharges of La Plata River<br />

corresponding to different timescale variability.<br />

Rainfall rate Streamflow Evap+Infilt<br />

(m 3 s -1 ) (m 3 s -1 ) (m 3 s -1 )<br />

1998 107000 36600 70400<br />

1999 81600 20440 61600<br />

Difference 23% 44% 13%<br />

El Niño 76000 25250 50750<br />

La Niña 71000 21640 49360<br />

Difference 7% 17% 3%<br />

1951-1970 72000 19300 52700<br />

1980-1999 83500 26000 56500<br />

Difference 16% 35% 9%<br />

69

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!