chapter - Atmospheric and Oceanic Science
chapter - Atmospheric and Oceanic Science
chapter - Atmospheric and Oceanic Science
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Regional precipitation trends<br />
5.4. Rainfall-streamflow relationships<br />
The streamflow of the main rivers of the La Plata basin, <strong>and</strong> La Plata River<br />
itself, have strong interannual <strong>and</strong> interdecadal variability forced by the climatic<br />
variability (Robertson <strong>and</strong> Mechoso 1998; Camilloni <strong>and</strong> Barros 2000). Of particular<br />
interest for this <strong>chapter</strong>, is that trends in precipitation have given place to<br />
simultaneous trends in the river streamflows.<br />
Streamflow variability of the La Plata basin rivers is addressed in the next<br />
<strong>chapter</strong>. However, in this section it will be discussed the relationship between the<br />
variability of precipitation <strong>and</strong> river streamflows in the La Plata basin. In particular<br />
it will be discussed the increase in the sum of the streamflows in the three tributaries<br />
of the La Plata River.<br />
Table 5.1 (from Berbery <strong>and</strong> Barros 2002) shows that percent changes in precipitation<br />
over the La Plata basin, upstream of Corrientes in the Paraná River <strong>and</strong><br />
Paso de los Libres in the Uruguay River are amplified in respective changes in the<br />
streamflow. In the case studied, the sensitivity of streamflow to basin-averaged precipitation<br />
changes, expressed as elasticity (fractional change in streamflow per fractional<br />
change in precipitation) was about two, that is, for every one percent change<br />
in precipitation there was a two percent change in streamflow. Three cases (one<br />
case study <strong>and</strong> two “climatological” cases) corresponding to different time scale<br />
variability are presented in table 5.1. The first case is an example of extreme yearto-year<br />
variability of the hydrologic cycle focused in 1998 <strong>and</strong> 1999. The second<br />
case is a generalization of the first example, as it contrasts composites of El Niño<br />
Table 5.1. Basin averaged rainfall rates <strong>and</strong> river discharges of La Plata River<br />
corresponding to different timescale variability.<br />
Rainfall rate Streamflow Evap+Infilt<br />
(m 3 s -1 ) (m 3 s -1 ) (m 3 s -1 )<br />
1998 107000 36600 70400<br />
1999 81600 20440 61600<br />
Difference 23% 44% 13%<br />
El Niño 76000 25250 50750<br />
La Niña 71000 21640 49360<br />
Difference 7% 17% 3%<br />
1951-1970 72000 19300 52700<br />
1980-1999 83500 26000 56500<br />
Difference 16% 35% 9%<br />
69