12.12.2012 Views

chapter - Atmospheric and Oceanic Science

chapter - Atmospheric and Oceanic Science

chapter - Atmospheric and Oceanic Science

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Statistical analysis of extreme events in a non-stationary context<br />

The models for non-stationarity mentioned above for the parameters of probability<br />

distributions have all had parameters which describe linear variations; thus<br />

in µ(t) = α + βt, the parameters α <strong>and</strong> β describe a linear variation, <strong>and</strong> the same<br />

is true of the harmonic model of the preceding paragraph. Even the model for nonstationarity<br />

in dispersion, σ(t) = exp (α + βt), can be converted to a linear form by<br />

taking logarithms. Models with this in-built linearity will not be appropriate for<br />

modelling every kind of statistical non-stationarity in hydrological extremes, however.<br />

One instance requiring an alternative approach would be where consideration<br />

of the physical processes that give rise to the non-stationarity suggests that the<br />

change in (say) mean value will eventually achieve a stable value. For example,<br />

non-stationarity in annual maximum discharges recorded at a flow-gauging site<br />

may be a consequence of deforestation in upstream areas; deforestation might be<br />

expected to cause annual maximum discharges to fluctuate about a mean value that<br />

is higher than that the mean which existed before deforestation began, giving rise<br />

to a change in the form of a trend towards a “plateau”. If it were reasonable to<br />

assume that deforestation is the only influence driving the non-stationarity, a more<br />

complex model - perhaps a GEV in which the parameter µ(t) = α + β exp( - k t) -<br />

could be appropriate. The three parameters α, β <strong>and</strong> k, (together with the GEV dispersion<br />

<strong>and</strong> shape parameters σ <strong>and</strong> ξ) can be estimated by Maximum Likelihood,<br />

following the general procedure briefly outlined in Section 16.3 above. Excellent<br />

software packages are available (e.g., Matlab®) for such calculations.<br />

15.5. Records with missing values<br />

In records of rainfall intensity, it is quite common for years to be incomplete.<br />

This is not a problem if the POT approach is used, but causes difficulties for the<br />

Block method. To avoid rejection of years for which part of the record is missing,<br />

one approach is the following, assuming that there are N years of record, some of<br />

which are incomplete.<br />

(I) Taking each month in turn, select the monthly maxima for all months that<br />

have no data missing. Thus for January, abstract the data from all years for which<br />

the January record is complete. (If r of the Januaries are incomplete, the number of<br />

monthly maxima for January will be N-r). Repeat for each of the 12 months.<br />

(II) Fit GEV distributions to each month in turn; denote the fitted cumulative<br />

probability distributions by F1(x, µ1, σ1, ξ1)… F12(x, µ12, σ12, ξ12).<br />

(III) The cumulative probability distribution of the annual maximum intensity<br />

is then the product given by<br />

FAnual(x)= F1(x, µ1, σ1, ξ1). F2(x, µ2, σ2, ξ2)… F12(x, µ12, σ12, ξ12)<br />

209

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!