12.12.2012 Views

chapter - Atmospheric and Oceanic Science

chapter - Atmospheric and Oceanic Science

chapter - Atmospheric and Oceanic Science

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Statistical analysis of extreme events in a non-stationary context<br />

F(x) = exp ( - [1 + ξ(x - µ)/σ] -1/ξ )) ξ≠0<br />

= exp(-exp(-(x - µ)/σ), ξ=0<br />

where the second form with ξ=0 is the well-known Gumbel distribution. We<br />

wish to test whether the location parameter µ changes over the 23-year period of<br />

record, <strong>and</strong> the simplest starting point is to assume that µ changes linearly over the<br />

period of record: that is, µ = α + βt, where t is the time in years. Thus four parameters<br />

(α, β, σ, ξ) must be estimated from the 23 data values in table 15.1. The<br />

method of fitting is the method of Maximum Likelihood (denoted by ML: see<br />

explanation of the method given below), <strong>and</strong> it is desired to know whether the<br />

parameter β differs significantly from zero, which would indicate a time-trend. Use<br />

of a st<strong>and</strong>ard statistical package (GenStat©) gives the results shown in table 15.2.<br />

Table 15.2. Results from fitting a GEV distribution, with time-trend in the<br />

location parameter µ, to data of table 15.1.<br />

Fitting Trend term: Year<br />

*** Estimates of GEV parameters ***<br />

estimate "s.e."<br />

Mu (Intercept) 30.09 3.190<br />

Sigma 9.017 2.668<br />

Eta 0.2765 0.3223<br />

Slope(Year) 0.05857 0.3079<br />

Maximum Log-Likelihood = -90.498<br />

Maximum value of GEV Distribution is Infinite (Eta >= 0)<br />

Significance Test that Eta = 0<br />

(ie P_01_hr follows a Gumbel distribution)<br />

Likelihood Ratio test statistic: 2.029<br />

Chi-Squared Probability of test: 0.1544<br />

It is seen that the estimate of the slope parameter β is 0.05857 ± 0.3079 (units:<br />

mm year -1 , recalling that the data are one-hour annual maxima), so that the estimate<br />

is much smaller than its st<strong>and</strong>ard error. Thus there is no significant evidence that<br />

the location parameter µ of the GEV distribution changed over the period 1975-97.<br />

It is also seen that the shape parameter ξ of the GEV distribution is estimated as<br />

0.2765 ± 0.3223, so that this estimate too is less than its st<strong>and</strong>ard error <strong>and</strong> not significantly<br />

different from zero. This means that the simpler Gumbel form F(x) =<br />

exp(-exp(-(x - µ)/σ), with two parameters instead of three, can be used in further<br />

analyses, instead of the GEV distribution.<br />

The example of the preceding paragraph explored whether the 23 annual<br />

observations showed a trend in time, but it is also possible (again using st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

software) to test whether time-trends exist in the dispersion parameter σ <strong>and</strong> the<br />

203

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!