12.12.2012 Views

chapter - Atmospheric and Oceanic Science

chapter - Atmospheric and Oceanic Science

chapter - Atmospheric and Oceanic Science

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Statistical analysis of extreme events in a non-stationary context<br />

or three consecutive days on which rainfall exceeded this threshold; it would then<br />

necessary to select, from this “cluster” of days, only the day on which the maximum<br />

rainfall occurred. If all days in the cluster were included for analysis, the peaks<br />

could not be considered as statistically independent. Independence between peaks<br />

can be obtained by choosing the threshold to be very high, but if the threshold is<br />

very high, the number of retained peaks will be small. The occurrence of “clumping”<br />

is, of course, much more evident when the “peak” events are low discharges<br />

below a threshold.<br />

Independence between successive observations is also important when using<br />

the Block method. It is almost always assumed that the events that occur in successive<br />

years are statistically independent. This assumption is valid for the analysis of<br />

rainfall intensities of short duration, but it may be less appropriate for the analysis<br />

of droughts, which may extend from one hydrological year into the next. It may<br />

also be invalid for the analysis of flood discharges in large drainage basins with<br />

extensive storage in soils <strong>and</strong> aquifers, since above-average rainfall in one year will<br />

fill storage, which may then contribute to the peak discharge of the following year.<br />

Conversely, below-average rainfall in a given year will deplete the volume in storage,<br />

so that the recharge of storage by rainfall in the following year may result in a<br />

depletion of flood flow. This is a feature of flood peaks observed at Ladário on the<br />

Upper Paraguay, where there is a highly significant serial correlation (0.48)<br />

between peak flood levels in successive years. Thus, the assumptions commonly<br />

made in the frequency analysis of flood records need to be carefully checked, in the<br />

case of large drainage basins of South America. Serial correlation in hydrological<br />

variables such as mean annual discharge is likely to be more important than the correlation<br />

between annual maximum discharges, but since this report is concerned<br />

with extremes rather than mean values, this problem is not considered further.<br />

However it should be noted that there will be strong correlation between annual<br />

maximum rainfall intensities of different durations (the rainfall event giving annual<br />

maximum 5-minute <strong>and</strong> 10-minute intensities is likely to be the same); this will<br />

be important where it is required to give confidence regions for curves that relate<br />

rainfall intensity to rainfall duration, for different return periods.<br />

15.2. Parametric <strong>and</strong> non-parametric methods for detecting trend in<br />

hydrological variables<br />

Where the Block approach is used, trends may be detected in records of<br />

extreme rainfall, or in records of extreme discharges, by either parametric or nonparametric<br />

methods. The Mann-Kendall test is perhaps the most well-known nonparametric<br />

test for trend in annual values of a hydrological variable, when it can be<br />

assumed to be independent from one year to the next; this <strong>and</strong> other non-parametric<br />

tests have the advantage that nothing need be assumed about either the form of<br />

probability distribution of the variable being analyzed, or the nature of the trend.<br />

201

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!