chapter - Atmospheric and Oceanic Science
chapter - Atmospheric and Oceanic Science
chapter - Atmospheric and Oceanic Science
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Climate scenarios<br />
The reliability of future climate scenarios obtained from GCMs is based on their<br />
ability to represent current climate <strong>and</strong> its variability. Gates et al. (1999) presents<br />
results of some simulations on current climate made in the context of the <strong>Atmospheric</strong><br />
Model Intercomparison Project (AMIP). The largest errors correspond to cloud cover<br />
<strong>and</strong> temperature at 200 hPa, while the lowest ones are in the surface temperature. The<br />
outputs related to the global hydrological processes within the AMIP project were<br />
analyzed by Lau et al. (1996) from the analysis of 29 GCMs. Although it is observed<br />
a great variability among the different models, when considering an ensemble of<br />
them, the result is very close to the observations showing an overestimation in the<br />
tropical precipitation <strong>and</strong> an underestimation in the extra-tropics.<br />
Results of GCMs developed by a group of institutes with high scientific <strong>and</strong><br />
computer capability are available through the web page of the Data Distribution<br />
Centre (DDC) of the IPCC (www.dkrz.de/ipcc/ddc/html/SRES/SRES_all.html).<br />
Table 12.1 shows a list of models <strong>and</strong> the institutions that developed them. Their validation<br />
for the climate of Southeastern South America is presented in Chapter 13.<br />
Table 12.1. GCM with information available through the DDC.<br />
Model Institution Current period Future period<br />
HADCM3<br />
Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction<br />
<strong>and</strong> Research (Reino Unido)<br />
12.6. Climate change scenarios from GCMs<br />
In the previous section, the difficulties of the GCMs to represent current climate<br />
were mentioned. This imposes limitations on the reliability of the scenarios of<br />
future climate. Likewise, it is necessary to validate the GCMs outputs at a regional<br />
level before using them in the preparation of scenarios. A way to elaborate climate<br />
change scenarios based on GCMs despite of errors that they show in the representation<br />
of current climate consists of preparing scenarios of differences between<br />
what is foreseen by GCMs for the future <strong>and</strong> its representation for the current baseline<br />
climate. This way, it is obtained a spatial distribution of the change in climate<br />
variables based exclusively on one GCM results.<br />
158<br />
1950-1999 2000-2100<br />
Australia's Commonwealth Scientific<br />
CSIRO-mk2 <strong>and</strong> Industrial Research Organization 1961-1999 2000-2100<br />
(Australia)<br />
ECHAM4/ Max Planck Institute<br />
OPYC3 für Meteorologie (Alemania)<br />
GFDL-R30<br />
NCAR-PCM<br />
CCCma<br />
Geophysical Fluid Dynamics<br />
Laboratory (Estados Unidos)<br />
National Centre for <strong>Atmospheric</strong><br />
Research (Estados Unidos)<br />
Canadian Center for Climate<br />
Modeling <strong>and</strong> Analysis (Canadá)<br />
1990-1999 2000-2100<br />
1961-1999 2000-2100<br />
1981-1999 2000-2100<br />
1950-1999 2000-2100