12.12.2012 Views

Everyday innovation report - Nesta

Everyday innovation report - Nesta

Everyday innovation report - Nesta

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Assertion 2. Innovative working is not<br />

an activity restricted to a subset of<br />

people with certain characteristics.<br />

The perception that there is a special group of<br />

people who are ‘innovators’ in organisations<br />

is a misinterpretation of the research<br />

evidence in this area. This study confirms<br />

the dangers of adopting this approach (and<br />

related stereotypes). Labelling employees<br />

as innovators, or not, is precarious for many<br />

reasons. Research evidence clearly shows self<br />

efficacy for innovative working (a belief and<br />

confidence in one’s ability to innovate) is a<br />

major determinant for <strong>innovation</strong> behaviour. 39<br />

If employees believe they are not capable,<br />

or indeed, expected to innovate in their job<br />

role they won’t. Reinforcing messages on the<br />

importance of diversity and inclusiveness for<br />

innovative working will be important for future<br />

government policy and organisational practice.<br />

Assertion 3. Research evidence supports<br />

the proposition that innovative<br />

working and innovative behaviours in<br />

organisations can be systematically<br />

enhanced.<br />

How to change behaviours and skills for<br />

innovative working is identified as a key<br />

challenge for many organisations. The case<br />

examples and evidence from the research<br />

literature shows this is not simple or easy.<br />

Although complex, the evidence indicates that<br />

it is possible to plan and implement behavioural<br />

and organisational change programmes to<br />

significantly enhance innovative working. 40 A<br />

diagnostic framework is presented in this <strong>report</strong><br />

offering approaches to initiate appropriate<br />

bespoke interventions.<br />

Assertion 4. Government policymakers<br />

have a significant role in promoting<br />

innovative working in the UK.<br />

Government policymakers can play a<br />

significant role in integrating findings on<br />

characteristics and behaviours that support<br />

innovative working into policy. For example,<br />

there is a need to integrate educational<br />

research and policy with findings regarding<br />

innovative working in organisations and<br />

corporate HR policy. Specifically, research on<br />

the skills and behaviours of young people<br />

should be integrated with research on adult<br />

populations in organisations. Understanding<br />

the implications of young people entering<br />

the workplace and the influence on behaviour<br />

and skills development could be important in<br />

the transition between school and innovative<br />

working in organisations. Using evidence<br />

<strong>report</strong>ed here, government policymakers<br />

could more clearly identify the management<br />

standards and practices that promote<br />

innovative working.<br />

39. Frese, M. and Fay, D. (2001)<br />

Personal initiative (PI): An<br />

active performance concept<br />

for work in the 21st century.<br />

In Staw, B.M. and Sutton,<br />

R.M. (Eds) ‘Research in<br />

Organisational Behaviour.’<br />

Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.<br />

23, pp.133–187.<br />

40. Anderson, N. and Gasteiger,<br />

R.M. (2007) ‘Innovation and<br />

creativity in organizations:<br />

Individual and work team<br />

research findings and<br />

implications for government<br />

policy.’ Research <strong>report</strong><br />

commissioned by the<br />

Dutch scientific council for<br />

government policy (WRR).<br />

The Hague: WRR.<br />

45

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!