Everyday innovation report - Nesta
Everyday innovation report - Nesta
Everyday innovation report - Nesta
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Part 3: Characteristics and behaviours for innovative<br />
working<br />
3.1 Openness to ideas, original problem<br />
solving and motivation are the top three<br />
characteristics for innovative working<br />
Our literature review 10 explores the association<br />
between <strong>innovation</strong> and employee behaviours<br />
and characteristics such as the influence of<br />
cognitive ability, personality, motivation,<br />
knowledge, behaviour, and emotion and mood<br />
states. Key messages from the review are:<br />
• Intelligence is a necessary but not sufficient<br />
condition for <strong>innovation</strong>. Although cognitive<br />
ability is related to <strong>innovation</strong>, it does not<br />
account for a large amount of the variance<br />
observed in employee <strong>innovation</strong>.<br />
• The most common personality trait<br />
associated with <strong>innovation</strong> is openness to<br />
experience. Conscientiousness is found to be<br />
a negative predictor of <strong>innovation</strong>, notably<br />
in the case of being dutiful and methodical.<br />
The influence of other personality traits (e.g.<br />
extraversion) is domain/context-dependent.<br />
• Motivation is one of the most important<br />
predictors of innovative working.<br />
Management style significantly influences<br />
employee motivation to innovate. Innovative<br />
people are intrinsically motivated by change<br />
such that extrinsic rewards do not necessarily<br />
enhance innovative working.<br />
• Domain-specific knowledge is a key human<br />
resource for <strong>innovation</strong> in organisations.<br />
• Studies focusing on the employee<br />
behaviours associated with <strong>innovation</strong><br />
highlight personal initiative, proactivity and<br />
social competence.<br />
• The association between mood and<br />
<strong>innovation</strong> is complex and requires further<br />
investigation. Emotional intelligence might<br />
be an important requisite for <strong>innovation</strong> but<br />
this is still relatively unexplored.<br />
Research literature shows that personal<br />
initiative and motivation contribute to<br />
<strong>innovation</strong>, particularly in relation to<br />
the implementation of ideas. 11,12 Some<br />
characteristics and behaviours are more<br />
effective or desirable at different phases of the<br />
<strong>innovation</strong> cycle. 13 As shown in Table 1, these<br />
findings were confirmed in the survey where<br />
respondents ranked motivation or personal<br />
initiative as one of the top three employee<br />
behaviours contributing to innovative working.<br />
This is confirmed by our interviewees.<br />
“Risk taking, resilience, motivation, and<br />
imagination are the key characteristics of<br />
individual innovators” (Robert Farace, National<br />
Resourcing Manager at the NHS Institute<br />
for Innovation). Openness to ideas is one of<br />
the most important individual characteristics<br />
for <strong>innovation</strong>, 14 which was confirmed in our<br />
survey with six out of ten respondents ranking<br />
openness amongst the top three individual<br />
contributors to innovative working in their<br />
organisation (see Table 1). Derek Smith, CEO<br />
at UBS Service centre says: “open mindedness,<br />
a willingness to share ideas, and to adapt<br />
and develop are at the core of employee<br />
<strong>innovation</strong>”.<br />
Many of our interviewees recognise the<br />
value of resilience for successful <strong>innovation</strong>.<br />
“Bringing an idea to the market is one of<br />
the most difficult aspects of innovating”<br />
(Jurij Paraszczak, Director of IBM Industry<br />
Solutions, New York. Successful innovators<br />
must be skilful at making their case when<br />
trying to overcome the barriers that often come<br />
10. Patterson, F. et al. (2009)<br />
Op. cit.<br />
11. Patterson, F. (2004) Personal<br />
initiative and <strong>innovation</strong><br />
at work. ‘Encyclopaedia<br />
of Applied Psychology.’ 2,<br />
pp.843-855.<br />
12. Sternberg, R.J. and Lubart,<br />
T.I. (1999) The concept of<br />
creativity: Prospects and<br />
paradigms. In Sternberg,<br />
R.J. (Ed.) ‘Handbook of<br />
creativity.’ New York, NY:<br />
Cambridge University Press.<br />
pp.3-15.<br />
13. Amabile, T.M. (1988) A<br />
model of creativity and<br />
<strong>innovation</strong> in organizations.<br />
‘Research in Organizational<br />
Behaviour.’ 10, pp.123-167.<br />
14. Patterson, F. (2002) Great<br />
minds don’t think alike?<br />
Person level predictors<br />
of <strong>innovation</strong> at work.<br />
‘International Review of<br />
Industrial and Organisational<br />
Psychology.’ 17, pp.115-<br />
144.<br />
17