Contracting
guidebook_intracting_web
guidebook_intracting_web
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
2.2/ Benefits of internal over external contracting<br />
A comparison of the administrative, legal, financial and technical aspects of Internal <strong>Contracting</strong> to contracting with external<br />
partners shows a number of advantages as shown in the table below:<br />
Aspects Internal <strong>Contracting</strong> External contracting<br />
Administrative<br />
Legal<br />
Financial<br />
Technical<br />
Within the limit of the fund’s size<br />
Fast implementation: measures can be<br />
selected, financed and implemented quickly.<br />
No need to undertake a public tendering<br />
process or get legal advice when drawing up<br />
the contract.<br />
Reduced need for exact quantification of the<br />
energy savings and the monitoring<br />
All savings realised flow back to the<br />
municipality<br />
Part-financing to enhance the energy-related<br />
quality of standard retrofits<br />
Supplementary financing to trigger<br />
investments through combined funding<br />
Simple agreement, possibility of integrating an<br />
environmental bonus<br />
No mark-up for business risk and profit or for<br />
interest on capital deployed<br />
Not subjected to interest rates<br />
Financing of small-scale projects (e.g.<br />
replacement of pumps, thermostats or control<br />
devices) of considerable interest because of<br />
their short payback-period<br />
City selects the measures to be implemented<br />
Know-how remains in the city departments<br />
Small effort required to monitor projects<br />
across their entire life time<br />
No administrative limit from the local<br />
authorities perspective<br />
Long delay (in particular because of auditing<br />
and contract negotiations)<br />
Risk of litigation related to the quantification<br />
and qualification of the realised savings<br />
Savings realised thanks to users behaviour<br />
changing are not taken into account<br />
Third party investor (ESCO) takes the risks<br />
and guarantees the energy savings<br />
Complex contracts to be agreed and signed<br />
Difficult to evaluate those measures for<br />
which no dedicated meter has been installed<br />
Renegotiation of the contract in case of<br />
changes in the building use patterns and<br />
times<br />
Additional external costs for the energy audit<br />
and planning<br />
Interest rate follows the market<br />
Often a constrained focus on highly profitable<br />
measures thus small-scale projects unlikely<br />
to be of interest though they might be highly<br />
sustainable<br />
“Cherry picking” risk: selection of most<br />
profitable measures, no integrated approach<br />
Expertise recommended to oversee the<br />
actions of the ESCO partner<br />
Infinite Solutions Guidebook – Internal <strong>Contracting</strong>