October 2010 - The Bulletin Magazine
October 2010 - The Bulletin Magazine
October 2010 - The Bulletin Magazine
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
WHY WARDS?<br />
submitted by James Sullivan<br />
A ward system in East Gwillimbury can provide more<br />
fair representation than the current at large system.<br />
<strong>The</strong> present system offers virtually no accountability.<br />
All issues are presented to a five-member council; but<br />
no single councillor is directly responsible for fielding<br />
constituents’ concerns or following through with a<br />
response. Issues raised by residents are routinely<br />
passed from council to various staff departments for a<br />
reply; issues that are perceived as controversial or<br />
politically sensitive can be easily sidestepped. So the<br />
buck wanders aimlessly, but never stops.<br />
<strong>The</strong> Ontario Municipal Act enables electors to petition<br />
council for a by-law dividing the municipality into<br />
wards. Canvassing for signatures, we encountered<br />
overwhelming support for a ward proposal because<br />
people want accountability in local government. A<br />
petition with over 200 signatures was delivered to<br />
council in December 2009.<br />
A staff report to council in February <strong>2010</strong><br />
recommended they hold a workshop on electoral<br />
systems, to be conducted by Dr. Robert Williams,<br />
professor emeritus University of Waterloo. <strong>The</strong> report<br />
further suggested that an electoral review be<br />
conducted to determine the merits of a ward system,<br />
and the criteria for establishing ward boundaries.<br />
<strong>The</strong> report recommended against a referendum<br />
question stating it is not an appropriate way to<br />
obtain public input, plus a ward review is<br />
needed for voters to make an informed<br />
decision.<br />
<strong>The</strong> petitioners supported the staff report. A full<br />
review seemed reasonable and appropriate, and<br />
in the best interest of the public. However, some<br />
councillors voted against the status quo,<br />
supporting a referendum question instead.<br />
Ambiguous and biased toward the status quo,<br />
the question relieved council of acting on the<br />
ward petition.<br />
Had council opted for an electoral review, there<br />
would have been no need for an OMB hearing.<br />
<strong>The</strong> referendum question as worded is meaningless<br />
without an electoral review to define alternatives to<br />
the current system. Our officials have left voters to<br />
ponder an obscure question. Further, council flatly<br />
stated, “it is not council’s job to educate the public” on<br />
the issue.<br />
My response to the referendum question?<br />
Vote No! Not the status quo.<br />
A ward system would benefit East Gwillimbury<br />
because:<br />
• Each area of town is afforded fair<br />
representation.<br />
• Ward councillors become more<br />
knowledgeable about the areas they represent.<br />
• Ward councillors are directly accountable to<br />
their constituents.<br />
• Each vote carries more weight in ward<br />
elections.<br />
• Wards reduce redundancies and council<br />
workloads.<br />
• Ward elections enable candidates to personally<br />
visit with each constituent household.<br />
• In at large systems, councillors compete<br />
against each other, hindering collaboration; it’s<br />
nearly impossible for new candidates to<br />
compete against incumbents.<br />
• We are far above the 10,000 population<br />
considered by the OMB to be the threshold for<br />
a ward system. 0<br />
MOUNT<br />
ALBERT<br />
VETERINARY<br />
HOSPITAL<br />
Dr. “Bob” Prendergast<br />
Full Service Animal Hospital<br />
Mon, Wed, Thurs & Fri 8am-6pm<br />
Tues 8am-7pm<br />
Grooming by Denise<br />
905-473-2400<br />
19144 Highway 48, Mount Albert<br />
(Across from Home Hardware<br />
Building Centre)<br />
www.thebulletinmagazine.com <strong>October</strong> <strong>2010</strong> | <strong>The</strong> <strong>Bulletin</strong> 35