11.12.2012 Views

Historical Dictionary of United States-Japan ... - Bakumatsu Films

Historical Dictionary of United States-Japan ... - Bakumatsu Films

Historical Dictionary of United States-Japan ... - Bakumatsu Films

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ATOMIC ENERGY BASIC LAW • 47<br />

ATOMIC BOMBING DEBATE. America’s atomic bomb attacks<br />

against Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August 1945 continue to spark<br />

heated historical controversy. The fundamental issue that has divided<br />

scholars is whether the use <strong>of</strong> atomic bombs against Hiroshima and<br />

Nagasaki was necessary to achieve victory in the war against <strong>Japan</strong>.<br />

The traditional interpretation insists that the decision to bomb Hiroshima<br />

and Nagasaki was informed by an aversion to the huge<br />

losses in American lives that an invasion <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Japan</strong>ese home islands<br />

entailed, and this was only heightened by the Battle <strong>of</strong> Okinawa.<br />

The revisionist interpretation argues that <strong>Japan</strong> in any event<br />

was near defeat and that the atomic bombing <strong>of</strong> Hiroshima and Nagasaki<br />

was informed less by military necessities than by an attempt<br />

to intimidate the Soviet Union.<br />

A reading <strong>of</strong> those works that make extensive use <strong>of</strong> <strong>Japan</strong>ese<br />

source materials reveals a different set <strong>of</strong> controversies. One line <strong>of</strong><br />

argument put forth in the late 1990s takes direct issue with the revisionist<br />

argument that—with or without Hiroshima and Nagasaki—<br />

<strong>Japan</strong> was on the brink <strong>of</strong> defeat. This argument maintains that although<br />

defeat is a military fait accompli, surrender is an act <strong>of</strong><br />

political decision-making. It concludes that the bombing <strong>of</strong> Hiroshima<br />

and Nagasaki made it possible for a hopelessly divided <strong>Japan</strong>ese government<br />

to reach the political decision for surrender. A separate line <strong>of</strong><br />

argument takes issue with this interpretation, concluding that the single<br />

most crucial issue in <strong>Japan</strong>’s decision to surrender was not the<br />

atomic attacks against Hiroshima and Nagasaki but the Soviet Union’s<br />

entry into the war. See also ATOMIC BOMB ATTACKS.<br />

ATOMIC ENERGY BASIC LAW. This law promulgated on 19 December<br />

1955 regulates the use <strong>of</strong> nuclear energy in <strong>Japan</strong>. The stated<br />

aim <strong>of</strong> the law is to promote the general welfare <strong>of</strong> <strong>Japan</strong>ese citizens,<br />

improve the standard <strong>of</strong> living by securing future energy resources,<br />

advancing academic research, and promoting industrial development.<br />

Use <strong>of</strong> nuclear energy is strictly limited to peaceful purpose and is<br />

guided by three principles: self-determination, democracy, and openness.<br />

In order to ensure safe use <strong>of</strong> nuclear energy, the law stipulates<br />

that <strong>Japan</strong> should implement its own independent government policies<br />

for regulating nuclear energy under a process that is democratic<br />

and open to the public.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!