Historical Dictionary of United States-Japan ... - Bakumatsu Films
Historical Dictionary of United States-Japan ... - Bakumatsu Films Historical Dictionary of United States-Japan ... - Bakumatsu Films
U.S.–JAPAN TRADE CONFLICTS • 253 was extended through 1974. In September 1977, a dumping suit was filed against Japanese steel producers. The Japanese producers were ready to carry out voluntary export restraint; however, Washington introduced a price-trigger mechanism in 1978: when steel prices fell below the standard prices, dumping investigations were automatically initiated. In 1968 and between 1970 and 1977, a series of dumping suits were filed against Japanese color television manufacturers. In May 1977, Tokyo concluded an orderly marketing agreement with Washington to pledge a three-year period of voluntary export restraint on Japanese manufacturers. Japan occupied 9.3 percent of U.S. automobile market share in 1976, but this had jumped drastically to 21.3 percent by 1980. Both the private sector and U.S. Congress demanded import relief or a market-share agreement with Japan. In May 1981, Tokyo concluded with Washington a three-year voluntary export restraint on automobiles and renewed this later. The restrictions were set at 2.3 million vehicles per year in April 1985. Many Japanese automakers moved their manufacturing base to the United States, which resulted in reducing Japan’s exports of automobiles. In 1994, Tokyo eliminated its voluntary export restraint on automobiles. In the late 1970s, Washington focused not only on Japan’s exports but also on the closed nature of Japan’s domestic market that prevented the United States from increasing its exports to Japan. In January 1978, due to strong U.S. demand, Japan expanded its import quotas for beef, grapefruit, and fruit juice. In January 1985, Tokyo and Washington started Market-Oriented Sector Selective talks (MOSS). The first round covered four sectors: telecommunications, electronics, pharmaceuticals and medical equipment, and forestry products. Transportation equipment was added to the MOSS agenda in the second round in 1986. In September 1986, the Japan–U.S. Semiconductor Agreement was concluded in order to prevent Japanese dumping in the U.S. market and to increase the share of foreign semiconductors in the Japanese market. Dissatisfied with the lack of visible results, in March 1987, Washington resorted to sanctions against Japan. In April 1988, the Super 301 provisions of the Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988 were enacted by the United States. The
254 • U.S.–JAPAN TRADE CONFLICTS Super 301 authorized the United States to impose sanctions when negotiations fail. With the Super 301 in hand, Washington focused on three sectors to open their markets: supercomputers, satellites, and wood products; however, Tokyo did not agree to further negotiations. The U.S. trade deficit with Japan increased rapidly from 1981 to 1987, when it peaked at $52.1 billion. Consequently, not only specific trade items but also Japanese business practices and administration became serious issues. Trade friction gradually turned into economic friction between Tokyo and Washington. Between September 1989 and June 1990, the Japan–U.S. Structural Impediments Initiative (SII) was held to discuss the domestic structural problems of both countries in order to resolve the Japan–U.S. trade imbalance. Because the Super 301 did not cover structural impediments in the Japanese market, these were discussed separately at the SII. The U.S. trade deficit began declining in 1988, but it rose again in the 1991 to 1994 period. In July 1993, succeeding the SII, the U.S.–Japan Framework Talks for a New Economic Partnership on bilateral trade were started to discuss not only each trade item but also a wide range of subjects, such as macroeconomic problems, development of human resources, and environment issues. In the sectoral consultation, Tokyo and Washington decided to focus on three sectors: government procurement, insurance, and automobile parts. Washington strongly demanded the setting up numerical targets, while Tokyo consistently opposed this because it would ruin the free-trade principle. Finally, in October 1994, a consensus was reached in principle on government procurement and insurance. In June 1995, the two countries concluded another agreement on automobile parts without numerical targets. U.S. trade deficit with Japan dropped in the mid-1990s, which eased trade friction between the two countries. In the late 1990s, the American economy continued in prosperity while Japan suffered from a long-term economic slump. Moreover, the World Trade Organization (WTO) tended to deal with trade-related conflicts, but there was no significant trade friction between Tokyo and Washington. In June 2001, President George Bush and Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi agreed to start the Japan–U.S. Economic Partnership for Growth, which aims to promote sustainable growth in the United States, Japan, and the world through their close dialogue and cooperation. See also FOREIGN EX- CHANGE ALLOCATION SYSTEM; FOREIGN EXCHANGE SPE-
- Page 244 and 245: PEACE KEEPING OPERATION (PKO) COOPE
- Page 246 and 247: PERRY, COMMODORE MATTHEW C. • 205
- Page 248 and 249: POTSDAM DECLARATION • 207 If Roos
- Page 250 and 251: PRIORITY PRODUCTION SYSTEM • 209
- Page 252 and 253: REISCHAUER, EDWIN O. • 211 RED PU
- Page 254 and 255: REPARATIONS • 213 REPARATIONS. Th
- Page 256 and 257: ROOSEVELT, FRANKLIN DELANO • 215
- Page 258 and 259: ROOSEVELT, THEODORE • 217 Followi
- Page 260 and 261: ROOT-TAKAHIRA AGREEMENT • 219 Roo
- Page 262 and 263: RUTGERS COLLEGE. Originally establi
- Page 264 and 265: SATO, EISAKU • 223 neither the Pe
- Page 266 and 267: SHANGHAI COMMUNIQUÉ • 225 1871,
- Page 268 and 269: SHIDEHARA, KIJU - RO - • 227 Brit
- Page 270 and 271: SHIMONOSEKI BOMBARDMENT • 229 was
- Page 272 and 273: SINO-JAPANESE WAR • 231 influence
- Page 274 and 275: SOUTHWARD ADVANCE • 233 action to
- Page 276 and 277: SPANISH-AMERICAN WAR, 1898 • 235
- Page 278 and 279: STIMSON, HENRY • 237 STIMSON, HEN
- Page 280 and 281: SUPER 301 PROVISIONS OF THE OMNIBUS
- Page 282 and 283: TO - GO - , SHIGENORI • 241 tary
- Page 284 and 285: TOKUGAWA SHOGUNATE • 243 Whatever
- Page 286 and 287: TRILATERAL COMMISSION • 245 tions
- Page 288 and 289: TRIPARTITE PACT • 247 Japanese Ar
- Page 290 and 291: China under Japanese control, the T
- Page 292 and 293: U.S.-JAPAN CONFERENCE ON CULTURAL A
- Page 296 and 297: U.S.-JAPAN TREATY OF COMMERCE AND N
- Page 298 and 299: alization of interest rates for lar
- Page 300 and 301: WASHINGTON CONFERENCE • 259 were
- Page 302 and 303: WILSON, WOODROW • 261 Born in 185
- Page 304 and 305: WORLD WAR II • 263 Pact was signe
- Page 306 and 307: YAMAKAWA, SUTEMATSU • 265 the Far
- Page 308 and 309: YONAI, MITSUMASA • 267 where—co
- Page 310 and 311: YOSHIDA LETTER • 269 YOSHIDA DOCT
- Page 312 and 313: YOSHIDA, SHOIN • 271 to 30 Octobe
- Page 314 and 315: Appendix A United States Presidents
- Page 316 and 317: UNITED STATES PRESIDENTS AND SECRET
- Page 318 and 319: Appendix B Japanese Prime Ministers
- Page 320 and 321: JAPANESE PRIME MINISTERS • 279 Na
- Page 322 and 323: Bibliography JAPAN-U.S. RELATIONS:
- Page 324 and 325: BIBLIOGRAPHY • 283 Beauchamp, Edw
- Page 326 and 327: Okahata, James, ed. A History of Ja
- Page 328 and 329: BIBLIOGRAPHY • 287 Campbell, Thom
- Page 330 and 331: BIBLIOGRAPHY • 289 Hunt, Michael
- Page 332 and 333: BIBLIOGRAPHY • 291 Pratt, Julius.
- Page 334 and 335: BIBLIOGRAPHY • 293 Division, Cent
- Page 336 and 337: BIBLIOGRAPHY • 295 Pempel, T. J.,
- Page 338 and 339: Constitution of Japan http://sunsit
- Page 340: About the Authors John Van Sant (Ph
U.S.–JAPAN TRADE CONFLICTS • 253<br />
was extended through 1974. In September 1977, a dumping suit was<br />
filed against <strong>Japan</strong>ese steel producers. The <strong>Japan</strong>ese producers were<br />
ready to carry out voluntary export restraint; however, Washington<br />
introduced a price-trigger mechanism in 1978: when steel prices fell<br />
below the standard prices, dumping investigations were automatically<br />
initiated.<br />
In 1968 and between 1970 and 1977, a series <strong>of</strong> dumping suits<br />
were filed against <strong>Japan</strong>ese color television manufacturers. In May<br />
1977, Tokyo concluded an orderly marketing agreement with Washington<br />
to pledge a three-year period <strong>of</strong> voluntary export restraint on<br />
<strong>Japan</strong>ese manufacturers.<br />
<strong>Japan</strong> occupied 9.3 percent <strong>of</strong> U.S. automobile market share in<br />
1976, but this had jumped drastically to 21.3 percent by 1980. Both<br />
the private sector and U.S. Congress demanded import relief or a<br />
market-share agreement with <strong>Japan</strong>. In May 1981, Tokyo concluded<br />
with Washington a three-year voluntary export restraint on automobiles<br />
and renewed this later. The restrictions were set at 2.3 million<br />
vehicles per year in April 1985. Many <strong>Japan</strong>ese automakers moved<br />
their manufacturing base to the <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong>, which resulted in reducing<br />
<strong>Japan</strong>’s exports <strong>of</strong> automobiles. In 1994, Tokyo eliminated its<br />
voluntary export restraint on automobiles.<br />
In the late 1970s, Washington focused not only on <strong>Japan</strong>’s exports<br />
but also on the closed nature <strong>of</strong> <strong>Japan</strong>’s domestic market that prevented<br />
the <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> from increasing its exports to <strong>Japan</strong>. In January<br />
1978, due to strong U.S. demand, <strong>Japan</strong> expanded its import<br />
quotas for beef, grapefruit, and fruit juice.<br />
In January 1985, Tokyo and Washington started Market-Oriented<br />
Sector Selective talks (MOSS). The first round covered four sectors:<br />
telecommunications, electronics, pharmaceuticals and medical<br />
equipment, and forestry products. Transportation equipment was<br />
added to the MOSS agenda in the second round in 1986.<br />
In September 1986, the <strong>Japan</strong>–U.S. Semiconductor Agreement<br />
was concluded in order to prevent <strong>Japan</strong>ese dumping in the U.S. market<br />
and to increase the share <strong>of</strong> foreign semiconductors in the <strong>Japan</strong>ese<br />
market. Dissatisfied with the lack <strong>of</strong> visible results, in March<br />
1987, Washington resorted to sanctions against <strong>Japan</strong>.<br />
In April 1988, the Super 301 provisions <strong>of</strong> the Omnibus Trade and<br />
Competitiveness Act <strong>of</strong> 1988 were enacted by the <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong>. The