11.12.2012 Views

Historical Dictionary of United States-Japan ... - Bakumatsu Films

Historical Dictionary of United States-Japan ... - Bakumatsu Films

Historical Dictionary of United States-Japan ... - Bakumatsu Films

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

TRIPARTITE PACT • 247<br />

<strong>Japan</strong>ese Army—and long opposed by the Imperial <strong>Japan</strong>ese Navy—<br />

the pact in the end result was the brainchild <strong>of</strong> Foreign Minister Yôsuke<br />

Matsuoka. Upon his assumption <strong>of</strong> the foreign ministership in<br />

July 1940, Matsuoka found in the services a congenial audience<br />

when he spoke with confidence <strong>of</strong> Germany’s ultimate victory in Europe.<br />

Matsuoka argued that tying <strong>Japan</strong>’s fortunes to Germany made<br />

sense because that nation’s war had rendered the European colonial<br />

regions <strong>of</strong> Southeast Asia ripe for <strong>Japan</strong>’s picking. Furthermore, the<br />

prospect <strong>of</strong> incorporating the Soviet Union into the Tripartite Pact—<br />

the Soviets were after all signatory to a non-aggression pact with<br />

Germany—held out the possibility <strong>of</strong> freeing the <strong>Japan</strong>ese army from<br />

its long-standing preoccupation with the threat <strong>of</strong> the Red Army. This<br />

could only serve to heighten enthusiasm for <strong>Japan</strong>’s advance into<br />

resource-rich Southeast Asia.<br />

According to Matsuoka’s diplomatic vision, there was but one remaining<br />

obstacle to <strong>Japan</strong>’s pursuit <strong>of</strong> empire: the <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong>.<br />

Through the Tripartite Pact, Matsuoka aimed to overcome that obstacle<br />

by adhering to his self-pr<strong>of</strong>essed “firm stand” toward that nation.<br />

Witness Article Three <strong>of</strong> the Pact, which committed the signatories to<br />

“assist one another with all political, economic, and military means<br />

when one <strong>of</strong> the three contracting parties is attacked by a power at present<br />

not involved in the European War or the Sino–<strong>Japan</strong>ese conflict.”<br />

This was, as President <strong>of</strong> the Privy Council Hara Yoshimichi noted, “a<br />

treaty <strong>of</strong> alliance with the <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> as its target.” By presenting the<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> with the threat <strong>of</strong> war against an overwhelming antidemocratic<br />

front—which, once the Soviet Union had been brought into<br />

the fold, would stretch across the Eurasian continent—Matsuoka<br />

hoped to cow the <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> back into its isolationist shell. With the<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> out <strong>of</strong> the way, <strong>Japan</strong> would be free to undertake its<br />

southward advance.<br />

The Tripartite Pact was a failure for many reasons. Far from breaking<br />

Washington’s resolve, it steeled it. In threatening the <strong>United</strong><br />

<strong>States</strong> with the use <strong>of</strong> force, it did not account for the fact that the<br />

force <strong>Japan</strong> could muster was merely a fraction <strong>of</strong> that which the<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> possessed and <strong>Japan</strong>’s alliance partners were in no way<br />

able to make up for that shortfall. It pushed <strong>Japan</strong>—now allied militarily<br />

to America’s proxy enemy in Europe—perilously close to an<br />

unwinnable war with the <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong>. Finally, Matsuoka’s dream <strong>of</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!