11.12.2012 Views

Historical Dictionary of United States-Japan ... - Bakumatsu Films

Historical Dictionary of United States-Japan ... - Bakumatsu Films

Historical Dictionary of United States-Japan ... - Bakumatsu Films

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

216 • ROOSEVELT, FRANKLIN DELANO<br />

Summarizing Roosevelt’s presidency (he won reelection an unprecedented<br />

three times, serving until his death in April 1945) is<br />

fraught with difficulties. He left little in the way <strong>of</strong> written records,<br />

and he was (in)famously flexible and deceptive. His first term saw<br />

little in the way <strong>of</strong> foreign policy initiatives. It was characterized instead<br />

by the belief that foreign policy must play a secondary role until<br />

the domestic economic crisis was eased. As a result, many historians<br />

(most notably Robert Divine) have portrayed Roosevelt as an<br />

isolationist who painfully metamorphosed into an interventionist<br />

sometime after the Munich crisis <strong>of</strong> 1938.<br />

Other historians have depicted Roosevelt as a fairly consistent internationalist<br />

(in his thought, if not always in his actions). After all,<br />

he reversed the policies <strong>of</strong> his predecessors when, in 1933, he established<br />

diplomatic relations with the Soviet Union—purportedly for<br />

the purpose <strong>of</strong> fostering strategic cooperation against <strong>Japan</strong>. Following<br />

the outbreak <strong>of</strong> the Sino–<strong>Japan</strong>ese War in 1937, he delivered his<br />

so-called Quarantine Address, which amounted to an unsuccessful effort<br />

to prepare the American people for a greater role on the world<br />

stage.<br />

Whether Roosevelt’s sympathies lay with the isolationists or the<br />

internationalists, there is no mistaking that his administration adopted<br />

an increasingly proactive stance following conclusion <strong>of</strong> the<br />

German–<strong>Japan</strong>ese–Italian Tripartite Pact <strong>of</strong> September 1940. (This<br />

has itself given rise to historical controversy, with Charles Beard and<br />

the violently anti-British Charles Tansill blaming an ostensibly conspiratorial<br />

President Franklin D. Roosevelt for American intervention<br />

in the war.) Denouncing the Tripartite Pact as an “unholy alliance”<br />

that sought “to dominate and enslave the entire human race,” Roosevelt<br />

called on the American people to “support the nations defending<br />

themselves against the Axis.” Having, however, assigned priority<br />

to the defeat <strong>of</strong> Germany, and furthermore not in possession <strong>of</strong> a twoocean<br />

navy, the Roosevelt administration until at least late November<br />

1941 trod a delicate diplomatic line toward the <strong>Japan</strong>ese. Whereas,<br />

on the one hand, there was an unmistakable display <strong>of</strong> firmness toward<br />

<strong>Japan</strong>ese hegemonic pretensions, on the other, there was a determined<br />

effort not to shut the door on the possibility <strong>of</strong> conciliation<br />

should the <strong>Japan</strong>ese dissociate themselves from Adolf Hitler and his<br />

brand <strong>of</strong> militaristic aggression.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!