11.12.2012 Views

Historical Dictionary of United States-Japan ... - Bakumatsu Films

Historical Dictionary of United States-Japan ... - Bakumatsu Films

Historical Dictionary of United States-Japan ... - Bakumatsu Films

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

208 • PRIOR CONSULTATION<br />

Grew received support from Secretary <strong>of</strong> War Henry Stimson,<br />

who revealed himself “inclined to agree with giving the <strong>Japan</strong>ese a<br />

modification <strong>of</strong> the unconditional surrender formula.” Truman vacillated,<br />

although by early July a committee made up <strong>of</strong> representatives<br />

from the State, War, and Navy Departments had drafted a declaration<br />

that included direct reference to the continued postwar existence <strong>of</strong> a<br />

“constitutional monarchy.” Grew submitted this draft to the new secretary<br />

<strong>of</strong> state, James F. Byrnes, although mindful <strong>of</strong> Byrnes’s disinclination<br />

to modify the unconditional surrender policy, Grew<br />

lamented that the text would probably be “ditched on the way over.”<br />

In one aspect he was correct: the Potsdam Declaration made no mention<br />

<strong>of</strong> the <strong>Japan</strong>ese monarchy. The <strong>Japan</strong>ese government subsequently<br />

indicated its intention to “ignore” the Potsdam Declaration,<br />

and Washington responded by dropping atomic bombs on Hiroshima<br />

and Nagasaki. The Soviet Union simultaneously entered the war<br />

against <strong>Japan</strong>. Tokyo then accepted the Potsdam Declaration in its entirety<br />

although, immediately after its surrender, it indicated that it<br />

saw no contradiction between the terms <strong>of</strong> surrender and retention <strong>of</strong><br />

the monarchy. See also PACIFIC WAR; WORLD WAR II.<br />

PRIOR CONSULTATION. Under a special arrangement stipulated in<br />

an exchange <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>ficial notes at the time the U.S.–<strong>Japan</strong> Security<br />

Treaty was amended in 1960, Washington assumed the following obligation:<br />

Before the <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> makes an important change in the<br />

military alignment or equipment <strong>of</strong> U.S. forces stationed in <strong>Japan</strong>, or<br />

before it conducts military operations that require use <strong>of</strong> its military<br />

bases located in <strong>Japan</strong>, the U.S. government should engage in prior<br />

consultations with the <strong>Japan</strong>ese government. The primary reason for<br />

the prior consultation is to secure <strong>Japan</strong>’s right to have a voice in the<br />

use <strong>of</strong> U.S. military bases located in <strong>Japan</strong>. President Dwight D.<br />

Eisenhower assured <strong>Japan</strong>ese Prime Minister Nobusuke Kishi that<br />

the <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> had no intention <strong>of</strong> conducting any kind <strong>of</strong> military<br />

operation that would go against the wishes <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Japan</strong>ese government<br />

expressed in any prior consultation.<br />

However, no prior consultation precedent has ever been established,<br />

partly because the <strong>of</strong>ficial note exchange left the following<br />

important loophole: The <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> would have to carry out prior<br />

consultation with <strong>Japan</strong> only when U.S. forces found it necessary to<br />

conduct sorties directly from U.S. bases in <strong>Japan</strong>. U.S. forces sta-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!