Historical Dictionary of United States-Japan ... - Bakumatsu Films
Historical Dictionary of United States-Japan ... - Bakumatsu Films Historical Dictionary of United States-Japan ... - Bakumatsu Films
MANCHURIAN INCIDENT • 173 MAKINO, NOBUAKI (1861–1949). Son of Toshimichi Okubo, a major leader in the early Meiji government, Makino was also the father-in-law of Shigeru Yoshida, who served as prime minister and foreign minister during most of the American Occupation of Japan. Makino studied in the United States from 1871 to 1874, and thereafter held a number of foreign affairs–related posts in the Japanese government. Seen as too pro-British and pro-American by right-wing militarists, Makino was forced out of the government in 1935 and nearly killed the following year in the 26 February 1936 Incident. See also JAPANESE STUDENTS IN AMERICA. MANCHURIAN INCIDENT (1931). In its most limited sense, the Manchurian Incident refers to the events of September 1931, when Japanese army forces conquered China’s northeastern provinces and later detached them from China proper to create the nominally independent state of Manchukuo. Its meaning and portent was, however, much broader in scope than these basic details attest. It was sparked by an explosion on 18 September on the South Manchurian Railway, just south of the southern Manchurian city of Mukden. Although the Japanese claimed that Chinese troops dynamited a section of the South Manchurian Railway track, the truth of the matter was that the explosion was part of a plot for the invasion of Manchuria that was engineered by a group of middle-echelon Kwantung Army officers, including Lieutenant-Colonel Kanji Ishiwara, Colonel Seijirō Itagaki, and Colonel Kenji Doihara. Thus marked the high point of the concept of gekokujō—domination of superiors by inferiors—which continued to haunt both the army and navy through the 1930s and early 1940s. The Manchurian Incident’s second point of significance derives from the fact that the army in the field consistently ignored and outmaneuvered the cabinet in Tokyo. The army’s initial response to the explosion was undertaken on its own initiative: it surrounded the Chinese barracks at Mukden, captured the garrison and military stores, and seized various points near the railway line in question. Once the Japanese cabinet learned of these developments, it sought to limit international fallout by keeping the fighting localized. Army authorities on the ground, however, ignored this decision and instead widened the sphere of operations. The Manchurian Incident thus provided ample evidence of the locus of power within the Japanese government.
174 • MANIFEST DESTINY A third point of significance derives from the ineffectiveness of the international reaction to the Manchurian Incident. Recognizing its inability to take the fight to the Japanese, the Chinese government at Nanjing appealed to the United States and to the League of Nations. Working on the mistaken assumption that the Japanese cabinet— most notably Foreign Minister Kijūrō Shidehara—might rein in the nation’s unruly soldiers, both the League and the United States at first treaded softly. By the closing days of 1931, however, the Japanese army had occupied most of Manchuria in defiance of world opinion. Secretary of State Henry L. Stimson responded on 7 January by issuing his “non-recognition doctrine,” which refused to recognize any changes in China brought about by force and in violation of the Open Door policy. Stimson’s non-recognition doctrine, however, was not backed by the threat of force and as such it left no impression on Japanese forces in Manchuria. The nominally independent state of Manchukuo was created later that year. MANIFEST DESTINY. The political, economic, cultural, and even moral ideology of Americans during the 19th century that they had the right to expand across North America at the expense of the indigenous inhabitants, chiefly Mexicans and Native Americans. From 1803 to 1853, the nation increased its territory by 300 percent through conquests, purchases, and diplomacy. The high point of Manifest Destiny came in the 1840s, when the controversy over Texas and the resulting Mexican–American War led to the U.S. acquisition of vast southwest and Pacific territories. Commodore Matthew Perry’s mission to Japan in 1853–1854 for trade and diplomatic relations can be viewed as an extension of the ideology of Manifest Destiny. In the second half of the 19th century, the U.S. continued to expand by acquiring the territories of Alaska, Hawaii, and the Philippines. See also CALIFORNIA. MANJIRO (ALSO KNOWN AS MANJIRO NAKAHAMA, JOHN MANJIRO, AND JOHN MUNG; 1827–1898). Manjiro is the most well-known and romanticized Japanese castaway sailor. Shipwrecked in 1841, Manjiro and four other young fisherman were rescued by Captain William Whitfield, then commanding a whaling vessel in the Pacific. Manjiro and the other Japanese castaways were taken to
- Page 164 and 165: JAPAN-U.S. AGREEMENT ON TRUST ISLAN
- Page 166 and 167: JAPAN-U.S. BUSINESSMEN’S CONFEREN
- Page 168 and 169: JAPAN-U.S. FLEET LOAN AGREEMENT •
- Page 170 and 171: JAPAN-U.S. JOINT DECLARATION ON SEC
- Page 172 and 173: JAPAN-U.S. SECURITY CONSULTATIVE CO
- Page 174 and 175: JAPAN-U.S. SECURITY TREATY, 1960
- Page 176 and 177: JAPAN-U.S. SECURITY TREATY, REVISIO
- Page 178 and 179: JAPAN-U.S. STATUS-OF-FORCES AGREEME
- Page 180 and 181: JAPAN-U.S. TEXTILE AGREEMENT • 13
- Page 182 and 183: JAPANESE-AMERICAN NEGOTIATIONS, 194
- Page 184 and 185: JAPANESE CONSTITUTION • 143 Chapt
- Page 186 and 187: JAPAN’S ACCESSION TO THE GENERAL
- Page 188 and 189: JOHN DOE ASSOCIATES • 147 JOHN DO
- Page 190 and 191: JOINT REPORT ON THE U.S.-JAPAN COMM
- Page 192 and 193: Ikeda’s visit to the United State
- Page 194 and 195: KATO - , TOMOSABURO - • 153 In 18
- Page 196 and 197: KISHI, NOBUSUKE • 155 lished a na
- Page 198 and 199: KOMURA, JU - TARO - • 157 to move
- Page 200 and 201: KONOE-ROOSEVELT SUMMIT MEETING •
- Page 202 and 203: Treaties Bureau in 1981 and to dire
- Page 204 and 205: LEND LEASE • 163 Defense Cooperat
- Page 206 and 207: LONDON NAVAL CONFERENCE • 165 Sev
- Page 208 and 209: cruisers, 150 destroyers, and 140 s
- Page 210 and 211: MACARTHUR LINE • 169 between Kore
- Page 212 and 213: Japan should seek to turn its expor
- Page 216 and 217: MANSFIELD, MIKE • 175 Hawaii, and
- Page 218 and 219: MATSUOKA, YO - SUKE • 177 of the
- Page 220 and 221: MEIJI ERA • 179 creasing suffrage
- Page 222 and 223: MONDALE, WALTER FREDERICK • 181 t
- Page 224 and 225: MURAYAMA, TOMIICHI • 183 arranged
- Page 226 and 227: the outbreak of the Korean War and
- Page 228 and 229: NATIONAL DEFENSE COUNCIL • 187 On
- Page 230 and 231: NIIJIMA, JO • 189 the Peace Reser
- Page 232 and 233: NOMURA-GREW CONVERSATIONS • 191 N
- Page 234 and 235: NUCLEAR ENERGY • 193 traditionall
- Page 236 and 237: OKAKURA, TENSHIN • 195 These isla
- Page 238 and 239: OKUMA, SHIGENOBU • 197 Ryukyu Isl
- Page 240 and 241: ORDERLY MARKETING AGREEMENT • 199
- Page 242 and 243: - P - PACIFIC WAR. See WORLD WAR II
- Page 244 and 245: PEACE KEEPING OPERATION (PKO) COOPE
- Page 246 and 247: PERRY, COMMODORE MATTHEW C. • 205
- Page 248 and 249: POTSDAM DECLARATION • 207 If Roos
- Page 250 and 251: PRIORITY PRODUCTION SYSTEM • 209
- Page 252 and 253: REISCHAUER, EDWIN O. • 211 RED PU
- Page 254 and 255: REPARATIONS • 213 REPARATIONS. Th
- Page 256 and 257: ROOSEVELT, FRANKLIN DELANO • 215
- Page 258 and 259: ROOSEVELT, THEODORE • 217 Followi
- Page 260 and 261: ROOT-TAKAHIRA AGREEMENT • 219 Roo
- Page 262 and 263: RUTGERS COLLEGE. Originally establi
MANCHURIAN INCIDENT • 173<br />
MAKINO, NOBUAKI (1861–1949). Son <strong>of</strong> Toshimichi Okubo, a<br />
major leader in the early Meiji government, Makino was also the father-in-law<br />
<strong>of</strong> Shigeru Yoshida, who served as prime minister and<br />
foreign minister during most <strong>of</strong> the American Occupation <strong>of</strong> <strong>Japan</strong>.<br />
Makino studied in the <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> from 1871 to 1874, and thereafter<br />
held a number <strong>of</strong> foreign affairs–related posts in the <strong>Japan</strong>ese<br />
government. Seen as too pro-British and pro-American by right-wing<br />
militarists, Makino was forced out <strong>of</strong> the government in 1935 and<br />
nearly killed the following year in the 26 February 1936 Incident.<br />
See also JAPANESE STUDENTS IN AMERICA.<br />
MANCHURIAN INCIDENT (1931). In its most limited sense, the<br />
Manchurian Incident refers to the events <strong>of</strong> September 1931, when<br />
<strong>Japan</strong>ese army forces conquered China’s northeastern provinces and<br />
later detached them from China proper to create the nominally independent<br />
state <strong>of</strong> Manchukuo. Its meaning and portent was, however,<br />
much broader in scope than these basic details attest. It was sparked<br />
by an explosion on 18 September on the South Manchurian Railway,<br />
just south <strong>of</strong> the southern Manchurian city <strong>of</strong> Mukden. Although the<br />
<strong>Japan</strong>ese claimed that Chinese troops dynamited a section <strong>of</strong> the<br />
South Manchurian Railway track, the truth <strong>of</strong> the matter was that the<br />
explosion was part <strong>of</strong> a plot for the invasion <strong>of</strong> Manchuria that was engineered<br />
by a group <strong>of</strong> middle-echelon Kwantung Army <strong>of</strong>ficers, including<br />
Lieutenant-Colonel Kanji Ishiwara, Colonel Seijirō Itagaki,<br />
and Colonel Kenji Doihara. Thus marked the high point <strong>of</strong> the concept<br />
<strong>of</strong> gekokujō—domination <strong>of</strong> superiors by inferiors—which continued<br />
to haunt both the army and navy through the 1930s and early 1940s.<br />
The Manchurian Incident’s second point <strong>of</strong> significance derives<br />
from the fact that the army in the field consistently ignored and outmaneuvered<br />
the cabinet in Tokyo. The army’s initial response to the<br />
explosion was undertaken on its own initiative: it surrounded the Chinese<br />
barracks at Mukden, captured the garrison and military stores,<br />
and seized various points near the railway line in question. Once the<br />
<strong>Japan</strong>ese cabinet learned <strong>of</strong> these developments, it sought to limit international<br />
fallout by keeping the fighting localized. Army authorities<br />
on the ground, however, ignored this decision and instead widened<br />
the sphere <strong>of</strong> operations. The Manchurian Incident thus provided ample<br />
evidence <strong>of</strong> the locus <strong>of</strong> power within the <strong>Japan</strong>ese government.