11.12.2012 Views

Historical Dictionary of United States-Japan ... - Bakumatsu Films

Historical Dictionary of United States-Japan ... - Bakumatsu Films

Historical Dictionary of United States-Japan ... - Bakumatsu Films

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

146 • JAPAN’S THREE NON-NUCLEAR PRINCIPLES<br />

September 1955, <strong>Japan</strong> joined GATT as a full member. The <strong>United</strong><br />

<strong>States</strong> strongly endorsed <strong>Japan</strong>’s accession to GATT because <strong>Japan</strong>’s<br />

economic independence based on multilateral liberal trade would be<br />

beneficial for the <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> to fight the Cold War. In contrast,<br />

Great Britain, France, Italy, and Spain strongly opposed <strong>Japan</strong>’s accession<br />

because <strong>of</strong> their bad experience regarding <strong>Japan</strong>’s export<br />

thrust with its low-price textile goods to the world market in the<br />

1930s. In the end, <strong>Japan</strong> had to accept the imposition <strong>of</strong> GATT Article<br />

35, Non-application <strong>of</strong> the Agreement Between Particular Contracting<br />

Parties, stipulating that “A contracting party may withhold<br />

application <strong>of</strong> its schedule <strong>of</strong> tariff concessions, or the entire agreement,<br />

from another contracting party with which it has not entered<br />

into tariff negotiations.” In short, <strong>Japan</strong> was excluded from the nondiscriminatory<br />

principle <strong>of</strong> GATT. By the mid-1960s, the four major<br />

European countries mentioned previously repealed their application<br />

<strong>of</strong> GATT Article 35 in return for <strong>Japan</strong>’s acceptance <strong>of</strong> voluntary export<br />

restraint, and still, in the 1960s, about 40 countries, including underdeveloped<br />

ones (such as Chad in Africa) applied Article 35 to<br />

<strong>Japan</strong>. Tokyo had to deal with the discriminatory status resulting<br />

from GATT Article 35 until the World Trade Organization (WTO)<br />

came into being 1995 as the successor to GATT. See also GENERAL<br />

AGREEMENT ON TARIFFS AND TRADE (GATT).<br />

JAPAN’S THREE NON-NUCLEAR PRINCIPLES. These are the<br />

principles <strong>of</strong> not producing, not possessing, and not allowing the entry<br />

<strong>of</strong> nuclear weapons into <strong>Japan</strong>. On 11 December 1967, at a meeting<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Lower House Budget Committee, Prime Minister Eisaku<br />

Sato clearly stated these three non-nuclear principles for the first<br />

time. He reconfirmed them in an administrative policy speech made<br />

at the Diet in January 1968. In November 1971, a Lower House plenary<br />

session adopted a resolution <strong>of</strong> the three principles. It is habitually<br />

suspected that U.S. naval vessels and combat aircraft are<br />

equipped with nuclear weapons, but Tokyo argues that as long as<br />

Washington <strong>of</strong>fers no prior consultation, they do not carry nuclear<br />

weapons. On 30 May 2002, Chief Cabinet Secretary Yasuo Fukuda<br />

stated that because <strong>of</strong> changes in the international situation, <strong>Japan</strong>’s<br />

non-nuclear principles might be altered. This statement sparked controversy;<br />

overwhelming <strong>Japan</strong>ese sentiment is still opposed to possessing<br />

nuclear weapons. See also NUCLEAR ENERGY.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!