11.12.2012 Views

Historical Dictionary of United States-Japan ... - Bakumatsu Films

Historical Dictionary of United States-Japan ... - Bakumatsu Films

Historical Dictionary of United States-Japan ... - Bakumatsu Films

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

JAPAN–U.S. SECURITY TREATY, 1960 • 133<br />

JAPAN–U.S. SECURITY TREATY, 1952. The formal name <strong>of</strong> this<br />

treaty is the Treaty <strong>of</strong> Mutual Cooperation and Security Between the<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> <strong>of</strong> America and <strong>Japan</strong>. The treaty was signed by the<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> and <strong>Japan</strong> immediately after the signing <strong>of</strong> the San<br />

Francisco Peace Treaty on 8 September 1951 and the treaty became<br />

effective along with the Peace Treaty on 28 April 1952. The treaty<br />

stipulates military cooperation between the <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> and <strong>Japan</strong><br />

in order to maintain security in <strong>Japan</strong> and peace and stability in Asia.<br />

Tokyo proposed that Washington station its armed forces inside<br />

<strong>Japan</strong>ese territory in order to maintain <strong>Japan</strong>’s security. The treaty<br />

consists <strong>of</strong> a preamble and five articles. This treaty was an unequal<br />

treaty because the <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> claimed the right to station its armed<br />

forces in <strong>Japan</strong>, but did not specifically assume any obligation to defend<br />

<strong>Japan</strong>. Moreover, U.S. armed forces stationed in <strong>Japan</strong> can provide<br />

“assistance given at the express request <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Japan</strong>ese Government<br />

to put down large-scale internal riots and disturbances in <strong>Japan</strong>,<br />

caused through instigation or intervention by an outside power or<br />

powers.” In short, U.S. forces were able to intervene in <strong>Japan</strong>ese domestic<br />

affairs. In addition, the treaty contained the so-called Far East<br />

clause: the U.S. armed forces “may be utilized to contribute to the<br />

maintenance <strong>of</strong> international peace and security in the Far East . . .<br />

against armed attack from without.” Because the geographical limitation<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Far East is not specifically defined in the treaty, and dangers<br />

in other areas, such as the Middle East, may cause a security<br />

threat to the Far East, it is virtually impossible for <strong>Japan</strong> to limit the<br />

behavior <strong>of</strong> the U.S. armed forces stationed in <strong>Japan</strong>. Tokyo began to<br />

discuss possible revision <strong>of</strong> this security treaty under the Ichiro Hatoyama<br />

Cabinet in the 1950s in order to amend these unequal clauses<br />

and turn the treaty into a more equal one. The Nobusuke Kishi Cabinet<br />

implemented treaty revision negotiations in earnest and a new security<br />

treaty was signed on 19 January 1960. See also DEFENSE;<br />

PACIFIC WAR; WORLD WAR II.<br />

JAPAN–U.S. SECURITY TREATY, 1960. The formal name <strong>of</strong> this<br />

treaty is the Treaty <strong>of</strong> Mutual Cooperation and Security between the<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> and <strong>Japan</strong>. The treaty was signed between the <strong>United</strong><br />

<strong>States</strong> and <strong>Japan</strong> on 19 January 1960 and it became effective on

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!